Cargando…
Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods
The introduction of antimicrobial residues in the food chain has a significant impact on human health. An innovative solution to avoid their presence in meat is the adaptation of current control methods for use with in vivo matrixes. Thus, the aim was to obtain paired blood and muscle samples from p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040175 |
_version_ | 1783536062613684224 |
---|---|
author | Serrano, María Jesús Mitjana, Olga Bonastre, Cristina Laborda, Alicia Falceto, María Victoria García-Gonzalo, Diego Abilleira, Eunate Elorduy, Janire Bousquet-Melou, Alain Mata, Luis Condón, Santiago Pagán, Rafael |
author_facet | Serrano, María Jesús Mitjana, Olga Bonastre, Cristina Laborda, Alicia Falceto, María Victoria García-Gonzalo, Diego Abilleira, Eunate Elorduy, Janire Bousquet-Melou, Alain Mata, Luis Condón, Santiago Pagán, Rafael |
author_sort | Serrano, María Jesús |
collection | PubMed |
description | The introduction of antimicrobial residues in the food chain has a significant impact on human health. An innovative solution to avoid their presence in meat is the adaptation of current control methods for use with in vivo matrixes. Thus, the aim was to obtain paired blood and muscle samples from pigs treated with some of the main antimicrobials currently used in veterinary medicine (oxytetracycline, sulfamethoxypyridazine, enrofloxacin, amoxicillin), and to compare their rate of depletion in both matrixes. Antimicrobial concentrations in paired samples of blood and muscle were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) or high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A comparison between values obtained in muscle and blood showed a similar distribution in both matrixes for oxytetracycline; for sulfamethoxypyridazine, a similar decrease rate but a concentration three times higher in blood compared to muscle was found; for enrofloxacin, we found significant differences in the rate of depletion, with similar antimicrobial concentrations in both matrixes with values close to the maximum residue limit (MRL) and higher amounts in muscle for values that lay considerably over the MRL. Conversely, amoxicillin depletion was so rapid that its appearance in carcasses does not seem to pose a risk. Therefore, blood would be a feasible matrix for the development of new in vivo tests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7235904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72359042020-05-28 Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods Serrano, María Jesús Mitjana, Olga Bonastre, Cristina Laborda, Alicia Falceto, María Victoria García-Gonzalo, Diego Abilleira, Eunate Elorduy, Janire Bousquet-Melou, Alain Mata, Luis Condón, Santiago Pagán, Rafael Antibiotics (Basel) Article The introduction of antimicrobial residues in the food chain has a significant impact on human health. An innovative solution to avoid their presence in meat is the adaptation of current control methods for use with in vivo matrixes. Thus, the aim was to obtain paired blood and muscle samples from pigs treated with some of the main antimicrobials currently used in veterinary medicine (oxytetracycline, sulfamethoxypyridazine, enrofloxacin, amoxicillin), and to compare their rate of depletion in both matrixes. Antimicrobial concentrations in paired samples of blood and muscle were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) or high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD). A comparison between values obtained in muscle and blood showed a similar distribution in both matrixes for oxytetracycline; for sulfamethoxypyridazine, a similar decrease rate but a concentration three times higher in blood compared to muscle was found; for enrofloxacin, we found significant differences in the rate of depletion, with similar antimicrobial concentrations in both matrixes with values close to the maximum residue limit (MRL) and higher amounts in muscle for values that lay considerably over the MRL. Conversely, amoxicillin depletion was so rapid that its appearance in carcasses does not seem to pose a risk. Therefore, blood would be a feasible matrix for the development of new in vivo tests. MDPI 2020-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7235904/ /pubmed/32290542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040175 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Serrano, María Jesús Mitjana, Olga Bonastre, Cristina Laborda, Alicia Falceto, María Victoria García-Gonzalo, Diego Abilleira, Eunate Elorduy, Janire Bousquet-Melou, Alain Mata, Luis Condón, Santiago Pagán, Rafael Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title | Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title_full | Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title_fullStr | Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title_short | Is Blood a Good Indicator for Detecting Antimicrobials in Meat? Evidence for the Development of In Vivo Surveillance Methods |
title_sort | is blood a good indicator for detecting antimicrobials in meat? evidence for the development of in vivo surveillance methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7235904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32290542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9040175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT serranomariajesus isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT mitjanaolga isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT bonastrecristina isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT labordaalicia isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT falcetomariavictoria isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT garciagonzalodiego isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT abilleiraeunate isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT elorduyjanire isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT bousquetmeloualain isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT mataluis isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT condonsantiago isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods AT paganrafael isbloodagoodindicatorfordetectingantimicrobialsinmeatevidenceforthedevelopmentofinvivosurveillancemethods |