Cargando…
Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning
Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such ‘active inference’ i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32433704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224055 |
_version_ | 1783536699614167040 |
---|---|
author | Brookes, Jack Mushtaq, Faisal Jamieson, Earle Fath, Aaron J. Bingham, Geoffrey Culmer, Peter Wilkie, Richard M. Mon-Williams, Mark |
author_facet | Brookes, Jack Mushtaq, Faisal Jamieson, Earle Fath, Aaron J. Bingham, Geoffrey Culmer, Peter Wilkie, Richard M. Mon-Williams, Mark |
author_sort | Brookes, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such ‘active inference’ is driven by ‘surprise’. We used these insights to create a formal model that explains why disturbance might help learning. In two experiments, participants undertook a continuous tracking task where they learned how to move their arm in different directions through a novel 3D force field. We compared baseline performance before and after exposure to the novel field to quantify learning. In Experiment 1, the exposure phases (but not the baseline measures) were delivered under three different conditions: (i) robot haptic assistance; (ii) no guidance; (iii) robot haptic disturbance. The disturbance group showed the best learning as our model predicted. Experiment 2 further tested our FEP inspired model. Assistive and/or disturbance forces were applied as a function of performance (low surprise), and compared to a random error manipulation (high surprise). The random group showed the most improvement as predicted by the model. Thus, motor learning can be conceptualised as a process of entropy reduction. Short term motor strategies (e.g. global impedance) can mitigate unexpected perturbations, but continuous movements require active inference about external force-fields in order to create accurate internal models of the external world (motor learning). Our findings reconcile research on the relationship between noise, variability, and motor learning, and show that information is the currency of motor learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7239483 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72394832020-06-08 Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning Brookes, Jack Mushtaq, Faisal Jamieson, Earle Fath, Aaron J. Bingham, Geoffrey Culmer, Peter Wilkie, Richard M. Mon-Williams, Mark PLoS One Research Article Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such ‘active inference’ is driven by ‘surprise’. We used these insights to create a formal model that explains why disturbance might help learning. In two experiments, participants undertook a continuous tracking task where they learned how to move their arm in different directions through a novel 3D force field. We compared baseline performance before and after exposure to the novel field to quantify learning. In Experiment 1, the exposure phases (but not the baseline measures) were delivered under three different conditions: (i) robot haptic assistance; (ii) no guidance; (iii) robot haptic disturbance. The disturbance group showed the best learning as our model predicted. Experiment 2 further tested our FEP inspired model. Assistive and/or disturbance forces were applied as a function of performance (low surprise), and compared to a random error manipulation (high surprise). The random group showed the most improvement as predicted by the model. Thus, motor learning can be conceptualised as a process of entropy reduction. Short term motor strategies (e.g. global impedance) can mitigate unexpected perturbations, but continuous movements require active inference about external force-fields in order to create accurate internal models of the external world (motor learning). Our findings reconcile research on the relationship between noise, variability, and motor learning, and show that information is the currency of motor learning. Public Library of Science 2020-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7239483/ /pubmed/32433704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224055 Text en © 2020 Brookes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brookes, Jack Mushtaq, Faisal Jamieson, Earle Fath, Aaron J. Bingham, Geoffrey Culmer, Peter Wilkie, Richard M. Mon-Williams, Mark Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title | Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title_full | Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title_fullStr | Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title_short | Exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
title_sort | exploring disturbance as a force for good in motor learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7239483/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32433704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brookesjack exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT mushtaqfaisal exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT jamiesonearle exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT fathaaronj exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT binghamgeoffrey exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT culmerpeter exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT wilkierichardm exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning AT monwilliamsmark exploringdisturbanceasaforceforgoodinmotorlearning |