Cargando…

Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players

This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pacholek, Martin, Zemková, Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042
_version_ 1783536895093899264
author Pacholek, Martin
Zemková, Erika
author_facet Pacholek, Martin
Zemková, Erika
author_sort Pacholek, Martin
collection PubMed
description This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the intermittent load type) or combined (the maximal strength and dynamic method) model of training. The training load was tailored to each athlete. Results showed that the complex model of training improved power (10 W/kg, p = 0.006) and height of vertical jump (5.3 cm, p = 0.001), weight of 1 Repeat Maximum (1RM) which was (5.8 kg, p = 0.015), power and speed in the acceleration phase of barbell half squats (BHS) at weights from 20 to 60 kg, and the number of repetitions in BHS (10.3%, p = 0.012). The combined model of training improved the time of shuttle run (0.44 s, p = 0.000), weight of 1RM in BHS (9.6kg, p = 0.000) and BP (4 kg, p = 0.000), power in the acceleration phase of BHS at weights from 50 to 60 kg, the number of repetitions in BP (14.3%, p = 0.000), BHS (9.4%, p = 0.002), barbell bench pulls (11.9%, p = 0.002) and sit-ups (7.7%, p = 0.001). These findings indicate that the complex model of training improves explosive abilities, whereas the combined model is effective for developing strength at weights close to players’ 1RM and for repeatedly overcoming resistance. Therefore, coaches should choose the training model based on the needs of individual players.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7240489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72404892020-06-11 Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players Pacholek, Martin Zemková, Erika Sports (Basel) Article This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the intermittent load type) or combined (the maximal strength and dynamic method) model of training. The training load was tailored to each athlete. Results showed that the complex model of training improved power (10 W/kg, p = 0.006) and height of vertical jump (5.3 cm, p = 0.001), weight of 1 Repeat Maximum (1RM) which was (5.8 kg, p = 0.015), power and speed in the acceleration phase of barbell half squats (BHS) at weights from 20 to 60 kg, and the number of repetitions in BHS (10.3%, p = 0.012). The combined model of training improved the time of shuttle run (0.44 s, p = 0.000), weight of 1RM in BHS (9.6kg, p = 0.000) and BP (4 kg, p = 0.000), power in the acceleration phase of BHS at weights from 50 to 60 kg, the number of repetitions in BP (14.3%, p = 0.000), BHS (9.4%, p = 0.002), barbell bench pulls (11.9%, p = 0.002) and sit-ups (7.7%, p = 0.001). These findings indicate that the complex model of training improves explosive abilities, whereas the combined model is effective for developing strength at weights close to players’ 1RM and for repeatedly overcoming resistance. Therefore, coaches should choose the training model based on the needs of individual players. MDPI 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7240489/ /pubmed/32235425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pacholek, Martin
Zemková, Erika
Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title_full Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title_fullStr Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title_short Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
title_sort effect of two strength training models on muscle power and strength in elite women’s football players
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235425
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042
work_keys_str_mv AT pacholekmartin effectoftwostrengthtrainingmodelsonmusclepowerandstrengthinelitewomensfootballplayers
AT zemkovaerika effectoftwostrengthtrainingmodelsonmusclepowerandstrengthinelitewomensfootballplayers