Cargando…
Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players
This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042 |
_version_ | 1783536895093899264 |
---|---|
author | Pacholek, Martin Zemková, Erika |
author_facet | Pacholek, Martin Zemková, Erika |
author_sort | Pacholek, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the intermittent load type) or combined (the maximal strength and dynamic method) model of training. The training load was tailored to each athlete. Results showed that the complex model of training improved power (10 W/kg, p = 0.006) and height of vertical jump (5.3 cm, p = 0.001), weight of 1 Repeat Maximum (1RM) which was (5.8 kg, p = 0.015), power and speed in the acceleration phase of barbell half squats (BHS) at weights from 20 to 60 kg, and the number of repetitions in BHS (10.3%, p = 0.012). The combined model of training improved the time of shuttle run (0.44 s, p = 0.000), weight of 1RM in BHS (9.6kg, p = 0.000) and BP (4 kg, p = 0.000), power in the acceleration phase of BHS at weights from 50 to 60 kg, the number of repetitions in BP (14.3%, p = 0.000), BHS (9.4%, p = 0.002), barbell bench pulls (11.9%, p = 0.002) and sit-ups (7.7%, p = 0.001). These findings indicate that the complex model of training improves explosive abilities, whereas the combined model is effective for developing strength at weights close to players’ 1RM and for repeatedly overcoming resistance. Therefore, coaches should choose the training model based on the needs of individual players. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7240489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72404892020-06-11 Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players Pacholek, Martin Zemková, Erika Sports (Basel) Article This study evaluates changes in power and strength after implementing two different models of 9-week strength training in elite women’s football players. A group of 13 players (age 20.2 ± 3.3 years, body mass 57.2 ± 3.7 kg, height 163.6 ± 5.3 cm, VO2max 45.2 ± ml/min) underwent either a complex (the intermittent load type) or combined (the maximal strength and dynamic method) model of training. The training load was tailored to each athlete. Results showed that the complex model of training improved power (10 W/kg, p = 0.006) and height of vertical jump (5.3 cm, p = 0.001), weight of 1 Repeat Maximum (1RM) which was (5.8 kg, p = 0.015), power and speed in the acceleration phase of barbell half squats (BHS) at weights from 20 to 60 kg, and the number of repetitions in BHS (10.3%, p = 0.012). The combined model of training improved the time of shuttle run (0.44 s, p = 0.000), weight of 1RM in BHS (9.6kg, p = 0.000) and BP (4 kg, p = 0.000), power in the acceleration phase of BHS at weights from 50 to 60 kg, the number of repetitions in BP (14.3%, p = 0.000), BHS (9.4%, p = 0.002), barbell bench pulls (11.9%, p = 0.002) and sit-ups (7.7%, p = 0.001). These findings indicate that the complex model of training improves explosive abilities, whereas the combined model is effective for developing strength at weights close to players’ 1RM and for repeatedly overcoming resistance. Therefore, coaches should choose the training model based on the needs of individual players. MDPI 2020-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7240489/ /pubmed/32235425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pacholek, Martin Zemková, Erika Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title | Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title_full | Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title_fullStr | Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title_short | Effect of Two Strength Training Models on Muscle Power and Strength in Elite Women’s Football Players |
title_sort | effect of two strength training models on muscle power and strength in elite women’s football players |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7240489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32235425 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8040042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pacholekmartin effectoftwostrengthtrainingmodelsonmusclepowerandstrengthinelitewomensfootballplayers AT zemkovaerika effectoftwostrengthtrainingmodelsonmusclepowerandstrengthinelitewomensfootballplayers |