Cargando…

The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alismail, Abdullah, Schaeffer, Brett, Oh, Andrea, Hamiduzzaman, Saba, Daher, Noha, Song, Hae-Young, Furukawa, Brian, Tan, Laren D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547281
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431
_version_ 1783537765726552064
author Alismail, Abdullah
Schaeffer, Brett
Oh, Andrea
Hamiduzzaman, Saba
Daher, Noha
Song, Hae-Young
Furukawa, Brian
Tan, Laren D
author_facet Alismail, Abdullah
Schaeffer, Brett
Oh, Andrea
Hamiduzzaman, Saba
Daher, Noha
Song, Hae-Young
Furukawa, Brian
Tan, Laren D
author_sort Alismail, Abdullah
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2–4 weeks after the patient’s visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic’s performance using the NPS method. RESULTS: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72454672020-06-15 The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method Alismail, Abdullah Schaeffer, Brett Oh, Andrea Hamiduzzaman, Saba Daher, Noha Song, Hae-Young Furukawa, Brian Tan, Laren D Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2–4 weeks after the patient’s visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic’s performance using the NPS method. RESULTS: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction. Dove 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7245467/ /pubmed/32547281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431 Text en © 2020 Alismail et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Alismail, Abdullah
Schaeffer, Brett
Oh, Andrea
Hamiduzzaman, Saba
Daher, Noha
Song, Hae-Young
Furukawa, Brian
Tan, Laren D
The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title_full The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title_fullStr The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title_full_unstemmed The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title_short The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
title_sort use of the net promoter score (nps) in an outpatient allergy and pulmonary clinic: an innovative look into using tablet-based tool vs traditional survey method
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547281
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431
work_keys_str_mv AT alismailabdullah theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT schaefferbrett theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT ohandrea theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT hamiduzzamansaba theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT dahernoha theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT songhaeyoung theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT furukawabrian theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT tanlarend theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT alismailabdullah useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT schaefferbrett useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT ohandrea useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT hamiduzzamansaba useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT dahernoha useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT songhaeyoung useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT furukawabrian useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod
AT tanlarend useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod