Cargando…
The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method
INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431 |
_version_ | 1783537765726552064 |
---|---|
author | Alismail, Abdullah Schaeffer, Brett Oh, Andrea Hamiduzzaman, Saba Daher, Noha Song, Hae-Young Furukawa, Brian Tan, Laren D |
author_facet | Alismail, Abdullah Schaeffer, Brett Oh, Andrea Hamiduzzaman, Saba Daher, Noha Song, Hae-Young Furukawa, Brian Tan, Laren D |
author_sort | Alismail, Abdullah |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2–4 weeks after the patient’s visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic’s performance using the NPS method. RESULTS: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7245467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72454672020-06-15 The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method Alismail, Abdullah Schaeffer, Brett Oh, Andrea Hamiduzzaman, Saba Daher, Noha Song, Hae-Young Furukawa, Brian Tan, Laren D Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction has become an essential metric in addition to the type of care they receive. Phone calls, emails, and text to patients after their healthcare visit are the typical way of obtaining the data reflecting patient satisfaction. The purpose of this retrospective quality improvement study is to compare the traditional post-outpatient clinic survey method with an onsite concise two-question survey using a tablet method immediately after the patient visit using Net Promoter Score (NPS) questions. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from February to August 2018 from an outpatient subspecialty clinic in southern California using an existing database from two different sources: the traditional method (TM) and the tablet-based tool (TBT), using NPS. The TM data were obtained from a third-party company using two questions via phone, email, and text collected 2–4 weeks after the patient’s visit. The TBT has only two questions that were given to patients upon their visit check-out. These two questions assessed both provider and clinic’s performance using the NPS method. RESULTS: In total, there were 1708 patients seen from February to August 2018. In the TM, the total outgoing messages during this period were 580 (34.0%) with 156 responses (27%). In the TBT, 648 out of 1708 (37.9%) surveys were collected with a 100% response rate. The NPS score showed that 99.2% of the providers were promoters. The NPS score for the clinic was 96% which reflects a promoter score. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when using the TBT immediately after their visit to the clinic, a higher response rate was noted. In addition, both methods had similar outcomes in terms of patient satisfaction NPS scores. Future prospective studies with a larger sample size are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the TBT tool in assessing patient satisfaction. Dove 2020-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7245467/ /pubmed/32547281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431 Text en © 2020 Alismail et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Alismail, Abdullah Schaeffer, Brett Oh, Andrea Hamiduzzaman, Saba Daher, Noha Song, Hae-Young Furukawa, Brian Tan, Laren D The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title | The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title_full | The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title_fullStr | The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title_short | The Use of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) in an Outpatient Allergy and Pulmonary Clinic: An Innovative Look into Using Tablet-Based Tool vs Traditional Survey Method |
title_sort | use of the net promoter score (nps) in an outpatient allergy and pulmonary clinic: an innovative look into using tablet-based tool vs traditional survey method |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32547281 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S248431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alismailabdullah theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT schaefferbrett theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT ohandrea theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT hamiduzzamansaba theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT dahernoha theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT songhaeyoung theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT furukawabrian theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT tanlarend theuseofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT alismailabdullah useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT schaefferbrett useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT ohandrea useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT hamiduzzamansaba useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT dahernoha useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT songhaeyoung useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT furukawabrian useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod AT tanlarend useofthenetpromoterscorenpsinanoutpatientallergyandpulmonaryclinicaninnovativelookintousingtabletbasedtoolvstraditionalsurveymethod |