Cargando…

Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing

BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana, Cunrath, Olivier, Bumann, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2
_version_ 1783537815435345920
author Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana
Cunrath, Olivier
Bumann, Dirk
author_facet Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana
Cunrath, Olivier
Bumann, Dirk
author_sort Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such as recombineering. RESULTS: Here, we established a time-effective variant of consecutive single-crossovers. This method exploits rapid plasmid construction using Gibson assembly, a convenient E. coli donor strain, and efficient dual-negative selection for improved suicide vector resolution. We used this method to generate in-frame deletions, insertions and point mutations in Salmonella enterica with limited hands-on time. Adapted versions enabled efficient gene editing also in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our method is time-effective and allows facile manipulation of multiple bacterial species including MDR clinical isolates. We anticipate that this method might be broadly applicable to additional bacterial species, including those for which recombineering has been difficult to implement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7245781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72457812020-06-01 Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana Cunrath, Olivier Bumann, Dirk BMC Microbiol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such as recombineering. RESULTS: Here, we established a time-effective variant of consecutive single-crossovers. This method exploits rapid plasmid construction using Gibson assembly, a convenient E. coli donor strain, and efficient dual-negative selection for improved suicide vector resolution. We used this method to generate in-frame deletions, insertions and point mutations in Salmonella enterica with limited hands-on time. Adapted versions enabled efficient gene editing also in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our method is time-effective and allows facile manipulation of multiple bacterial species including MDR clinical isolates. We anticipate that this method might be broadly applicable to additional bacterial species, including those for which recombineering has been difficult to implement. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245781/ /pubmed/32448155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology Article
Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana
Cunrath, Olivier
Bumann, Dirk
Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title_full Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title_fullStr Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title_full_unstemmed Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title_short Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
title_sort efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
topic Methodology Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2
work_keys_str_mv AT cianfanellifrancescaromana efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting
AT cunratholivier efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting
AT bumanndirk efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting