Cargando…
Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing
BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2 |
_version_ | 1783537815435345920 |
---|---|
author | Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana Cunrath, Olivier Bumann, Dirk |
author_facet | Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana Cunrath, Olivier Bumann, Dirk |
author_sort | Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such as recombineering. RESULTS: Here, we established a time-effective variant of consecutive single-crossovers. This method exploits rapid plasmid construction using Gibson assembly, a convenient E. coli donor strain, and efficient dual-negative selection for improved suicide vector resolution. We used this method to generate in-frame deletions, insertions and point mutations in Salmonella enterica with limited hands-on time. Adapted versions enabled efficient gene editing also in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our method is time-effective and allows facile manipulation of multiple bacterial species including MDR clinical isolates. We anticipate that this method might be broadly applicable to additional bacterial species, including those for which recombineering has been difficult to implement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7245781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72457812020-06-01 Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana Cunrath, Olivier Bumann, Dirk BMC Microbiol Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Gene editing is key for elucidating gene function. Traditional methods, such as consecutive single-crossovers, have been widely used to modify bacterial genomes. However, cumbersome cloning and limited efficiency of negative selection often make this method slower than other methods such as recombineering. RESULTS: Here, we established a time-effective variant of consecutive single-crossovers. This method exploits rapid plasmid construction using Gibson assembly, a convenient E. coli donor strain, and efficient dual-negative selection for improved suicide vector resolution. We used this method to generate in-frame deletions, insertions and point mutations in Salmonella enterica with limited hands-on time. Adapted versions enabled efficient gene editing also in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and multi-drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli clinical isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our method is time-effective and allows facile manipulation of multiple bacterial species including MDR clinical isolates. We anticipate that this method might be broadly applicable to additional bacterial species, including those for which recombineering has been difficult to implement. BioMed Central 2020-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7245781/ /pubmed/32448155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Cianfanelli, Francesca Romana Cunrath, Olivier Bumann, Dirk Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title | Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title_full | Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title_fullStr | Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title_short | Efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
title_sort | efficient dual-negative selection for bacterial genome editing |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7245781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32448155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01819-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cianfanellifrancescaromana efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting AT cunratholivier efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting AT bumanndirk efficientdualnegativeselectionforbacterialgenomeediting |