Cargando…

Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach

School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dowling, Katherine, Barry, Margaret M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249
_version_ 1783538033558028288
author Dowling, Katherine
Barry, Margaret M.
author_facet Dowling, Katherine
Barry, Margaret M.
author_sort Dowling, Katherine
collection PubMed
description School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in implementation quality for schools implementing the MindOut program and to identify factors that were likely to contribute to this variability. Employing a mixed methods approach, quantitative and qualitative implementation data were collected from teachers (n = 16) and students (n = 280) who participated in the MindOut program. Quantitative indicators were used to score schools’ implementation quality across four dimensions (dosage, adherence/fidelity, quality of delivery and participant responsiveness), and these were averaged to determine overall level of implementation (high/low). Qualitative data identified factors that contributed to implementation quality, and factors were then analyzed in accordance with the schools’ implementation level grouping. Findings indicated that variability in implementation quality existed both between and within schools. A total of eight schools were assigned as high implementers and another eight as low implementers. Influencing factors were categorized into five themes: (i) program factors, (ii) participant factors, (iii) teacher factors, (iv) school contextual factors, and (v) organizational capacity factors. Several differences between high and low implementers were found in relation to these influencing factors. The findings contribute to the evidence on implementation quality in schools by advancing knowledge on measuring implementation quality across multiple dimensions and informants successfully. These findings can also inform practitioners of the main influencing factors in schools so that strategies can be developed to optimize implementation quality in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7246810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72468102020-06-10 Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach Dowling, Katherine Barry, Margaret M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in implementation quality for schools implementing the MindOut program and to identify factors that were likely to contribute to this variability. Employing a mixed methods approach, quantitative and qualitative implementation data were collected from teachers (n = 16) and students (n = 280) who participated in the MindOut program. Quantitative indicators were used to score schools’ implementation quality across four dimensions (dosage, adherence/fidelity, quality of delivery and participant responsiveness), and these were averaged to determine overall level of implementation (high/low). Qualitative data identified factors that contributed to implementation quality, and factors were then analyzed in accordance with the schools’ implementation level grouping. Findings indicated that variability in implementation quality existed both between and within schools. A total of eight schools were assigned as high implementers and another eight as low implementers. Influencing factors were categorized into five themes: (i) program factors, (ii) participant factors, (iii) teacher factors, (iv) school contextual factors, and (v) organizational capacity factors. Several differences between high and low implementers were found in relation to these influencing factors. The findings contribute to the evidence on implementation quality in schools by advancing knowledge on measuring implementation quality across multiple dimensions and informants successfully. These findings can also inform practitioners of the main influencing factors in schools so that strategies can be developed to optimize implementation quality in the future. MDPI 2020-05-07 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7246810/ /pubmed/32392698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Dowling, Katherine
Barry, Margaret M.
Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title_full Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title_fullStr Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title_short Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
title_sort evaluating the implementation quality of a social and emotional learning program: a mixed methods approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392698
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249
work_keys_str_mv AT dowlingkatherine evaluatingtheimplementationqualityofasocialandemotionallearningprogramamixedmethodsapproach
AT barrymargaretm evaluatingtheimplementationqualityofasocialandemotionallearningprogramamixedmethodsapproach