Cargando…
Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach
School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249 |
_version_ | 1783538033558028288 |
---|---|
author | Dowling, Katherine Barry, Margaret M. |
author_facet | Dowling, Katherine Barry, Margaret M. |
author_sort | Dowling, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in implementation quality for schools implementing the MindOut program and to identify factors that were likely to contribute to this variability. Employing a mixed methods approach, quantitative and qualitative implementation data were collected from teachers (n = 16) and students (n = 280) who participated in the MindOut program. Quantitative indicators were used to score schools’ implementation quality across four dimensions (dosage, adherence/fidelity, quality of delivery and participant responsiveness), and these were averaged to determine overall level of implementation (high/low). Qualitative data identified factors that contributed to implementation quality, and factors were then analyzed in accordance with the schools’ implementation level grouping. Findings indicated that variability in implementation quality existed both between and within schools. A total of eight schools were assigned as high implementers and another eight as low implementers. Influencing factors were categorized into five themes: (i) program factors, (ii) participant factors, (iii) teacher factors, (iv) school contextual factors, and (v) organizational capacity factors. Several differences between high and low implementers were found in relation to these influencing factors. The findings contribute to the evidence on implementation quality in schools by advancing knowledge on measuring implementation quality across multiple dimensions and informants successfully. These findings can also inform practitioners of the main influencing factors in schools so that strategies can be developed to optimize implementation quality in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7246810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-72468102020-06-10 Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach Dowling, Katherine Barry, Margaret M. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs have been shown to be effective in producing positive outcomes for adolescents. However, variability in implementation quality can have a negative impact on these program effects. The aim of this current study is to examine the variability in implementation quality for schools implementing the MindOut program and to identify factors that were likely to contribute to this variability. Employing a mixed methods approach, quantitative and qualitative implementation data were collected from teachers (n = 16) and students (n = 280) who participated in the MindOut program. Quantitative indicators were used to score schools’ implementation quality across four dimensions (dosage, adherence/fidelity, quality of delivery and participant responsiveness), and these were averaged to determine overall level of implementation (high/low). Qualitative data identified factors that contributed to implementation quality, and factors were then analyzed in accordance with the schools’ implementation level grouping. Findings indicated that variability in implementation quality existed both between and within schools. A total of eight schools were assigned as high implementers and another eight as low implementers. Influencing factors were categorized into five themes: (i) program factors, (ii) participant factors, (iii) teacher factors, (iv) school contextual factors, and (v) organizational capacity factors. Several differences between high and low implementers were found in relation to these influencing factors. The findings contribute to the evidence on implementation quality in schools by advancing knowledge on measuring implementation quality across multiple dimensions and informants successfully. These findings can also inform practitioners of the main influencing factors in schools so that strategies can be developed to optimize implementation quality in the future. MDPI 2020-05-07 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7246810/ /pubmed/32392698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Dowling, Katherine Barry, Margaret M. Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title | Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title_full | Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title_short | Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach |
title_sort | evaluating the implementation quality of a social and emotional learning program: a mixed methods approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7246810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32392698 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dowlingkatherine evaluatingtheimplementationqualityofasocialandemotionallearningprogramamixedmethodsapproach AT barrymargaretm evaluatingtheimplementationqualityofasocialandemotionallearningprogramamixedmethodsapproach |