Cargando…

Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning

The dual-process account and the propositional account of learning hold opposite views regarding the recruitment of higher-level processes in rule learning and associative learning. Taking an individual differences perspective, the current study focused on the relationship between rule learning and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Tengefi, Schweizer, Karl, Ren, Xuezhu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0255-8
_version_ 1783541544219836416
author Wang, Tengefi
Schweizer, Karl
Ren, Xuezhu
author_facet Wang, Tengefi
Schweizer, Karl
Ren, Xuezhu
author_sort Wang, Tengefi
collection PubMed
description The dual-process account and the propositional account of learning hold opposite views regarding the recruitment of higher-level processes in rule learning and associative learning. Taking an individual differences perspective, the current study focused on the relationship between rule learning and associative learning and investigated to what extent executive control accounts for rule learning and associative learning. Two studies were conducted. In Study 1, a sample of 184 university students completed paired associative learning and rule learning tasks, as well as measures of working memory capacity, short-term storage, and executive control. Theory-based bifactor models were used to achieve a purified representation of executive control. The results showed that the latent correlation between associative learning and rule learning was rather small. Executive control showed a substantial relationship with rule learning, whereas no significant link was found with associative learning. In Study 2, a sample of 211 university students completed a three-term contingency learning task and an executive control task. The results replicated the finding that executive control was not significantly related to associative learning. Taken together, these results suggest a dissociation between rule learning and associative learning in terms of their underlying processes, which supports the dual-process account of learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7268100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72681002020-06-09 Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning Wang, Tengefi Schweizer, Karl Ren, Xuezhu Adv Cogn Psychol Research Article The dual-process account and the propositional account of learning hold opposite views regarding the recruitment of higher-level processes in rule learning and associative learning. Taking an individual differences perspective, the current study focused on the relationship between rule learning and associative learning and investigated to what extent executive control accounts for rule learning and associative learning. Two studies were conducted. In Study 1, a sample of 184 university students completed paired associative learning and rule learning tasks, as well as measures of working memory capacity, short-term storage, and executive control. Theory-based bifactor models were used to achieve a purified representation of executive control. The results showed that the latent correlation between associative learning and rule learning was rather small. Executive control showed a substantial relationship with rule learning, whereas no significant link was found with associative learning. In Study 2, a sample of 211 university students completed a three-term contingency learning task and an executive control task. The results replicated the finding that executive control was not significantly related to associative learning. Taken together, these results suggest a dissociation between rule learning and associative learning in terms of their underlying processes, which supports the dual-process account of learning. University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw 2019-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7268100/ /pubmed/32523638 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0255-8 Text en Copyright: © 2019 University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Tengefi
Schweizer, Karl
Ren, Xuezhu
Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title_full Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title_fullStr Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title_full_unstemmed Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title_short Executive Control in Learning: Evidence for the Dissociation of Rule Learning and Associative Learning
title_sort executive control in learning: evidence for the dissociation of rule learning and associative learning
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32523638
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0255-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wangtengefi executivecontrolinlearningevidenceforthedissociationofrulelearningandassociativelearning
AT schweizerkarl executivecontrolinlearningevidenceforthedissociationofrulelearningandassociativelearning
AT renxuezhu executivecontrolinlearningevidenceforthedissociationofrulelearningandassociativelearning