Cargando…

Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint

Nowadays, “green analytical chemistry” challenges are to develop techniques which reduce the environmental impact not only in term of analysis but also in the sample preparation step. Within this objective, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was investigated to determine the initial composition of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirondart, Mathilde, Rombaut, Natacha, Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie, Bily, Antoine, Chemat, Farid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9050584
_version_ 1783543395538436096
author Hirondart, Mathilde
Rombaut, Natacha
Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie
Bily, Antoine
Chemat, Farid
author_facet Hirondart, Mathilde
Rombaut, Natacha
Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie
Bily, Antoine
Chemat, Farid
author_sort Hirondart, Mathilde
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, “green analytical chemistry” challenges are to develop techniques which reduce the environmental impact not only in term of analysis but also in the sample preparation step. Within this objective, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was investigated to determine the initial composition of key antioxidants contained in rosemary leaves: Rosmarinic acid (RA), carnosic acid (CA), and carnosol (CO). An experimental design was applied to identify an optimized PLE set of extraction parameters: A temperature of 183 °C, a pressure of 130 bar, and an extraction duration of 3 min enabled recovering rosemary antioxidants. PLE was further compared to conventional Soxhlet extraction (CSE) in term of global processing time, energy used, solvent recovery, raw material used, accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness to extract quantitatively RA, CA, and CO from rosemary leaves. A statistical comparison of the two extraction procedure (PLE and CSE) was achieved and showed no significant difference between the two procedures in terms of RA, CA, and CO extraction. To complete the study showing that the use of PLE is an advantageous alternative to CSE, the eco-footprint of the PLE process was evaluated. Results demonstrate that it is a rapid, clean, and environmentally friendly extraction technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7278715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72787152020-06-12 Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint Hirondart, Mathilde Rombaut, Natacha Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie Bily, Antoine Chemat, Farid Foods Article Nowadays, “green analytical chemistry” challenges are to develop techniques which reduce the environmental impact not only in term of analysis but also in the sample preparation step. Within this objective, pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) was investigated to determine the initial composition of key antioxidants contained in rosemary leaves: Rosmarinic acid (RA), carnosic acid (CA), and carnosol (CO). An experimental design was applied to identify an optimized PLE set of extraction parameters: A temperature of 183 °C, a pressure of 130 bar, and an extraction duration of 3 min enabled recovering rosemary antioxidants. PLE was further compared to conventional Soxhlet extraction (CSE) in term of global processing time, energy used, solvent recovery, raw material used, accuracy, reproducibility, and robustness to extract quantitatively RA, CA, and CO from rosemary leaves. A statistical comparison of the two extraction procedure (PLE and CSE) was achieved and showed no significant difference between the two procedures in terms of RA, CA, and CO extraction. To complete the study showing that the use of PLE is an advantageous alternative to CSE, the eco-footprint of the PLE process was evaluated. Results demonstrate that it is a rapid, clean, and environmentally friendly extraction technique. MDPI 2020-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7278715/ /pubmed/32380668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9050584 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hirondart, Mathilde
Rombaut, Natacha
Fabiano-Tixier, Anne Sylvie
Bily, Antoine
Chemat, Farid
Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title_full Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title_fullStr Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title_short Comparison between Pressurized Liquid Extraction and Conventional Soxhlet Extraction for Rosemary Antioxidants, Yield, Composition, and Environmental Footprint
title_sort comparison between pressurized liquid extraction and conventional soxhlet extraction for rosemary antioxidants, yield, composition, and environmental footprint
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7278715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32380668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9050584
work_keys_str_mv AT hirondartmathilde comparisonbetweenpressurizedliquidextractionandconventionalsoxhletextractionforrosemaryantioxidantsyieldcompositionandenvironmentalfootprint
AT rombautnatacha comparisonbetweenpressurizedliquidextractionandconventionalsoxhletextractionforrosemaryantioxidantsyieldcompositionandenvironmentalfootprint
AT fabianotixierannesylvie comparisonbetweenpressurizedliquidextractionandconventionalsoxhletextractionforrosemaryantioxidantsyieldcompositionandenvironmentalfootprint
AT bilyantoine comparisonbetweenpressurizedliquidextractionandconventionalsoxhletextractionforrosemaryantioxidantsyieldcompositionandenvironmentalfootprint
AT chematfarid comparisonbetweenpressurizedliquidextractionandconventionalsoxhletextractionforrosemaryantioxidantsyieldcompositionandenvironmentalfootprint