Cargando…

Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review

In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), e-learning for medical education may alleviate the burden of severe health worker shortages and deliver affordable access to high quality medical education. However, diverse challenges in infrastructure and adoption are encountered when implementing e-lea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barteit, Sandra, Guzek, Dorota, Jahn, Albrecht, Bärnighausen, Till, Jorge, Margarida Mendes, Neuhann, Florian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
_version_ 1783545996503941120
author Barteit, Sandra
Guzek, Dorota
Jahn, Albrecht
Bärnighausen, Till
Jorge, Margarida Mendes
Neuhann, Florian
author_facet Barteit, Sandra
Guzek, Dorota
Jahn, Albrecht
Bärnighausen, Till
Jorge, Margarida Mendes
Neuhann, Florian
author_sort Barteit, Sandra
collection PubMed
description In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), e-learning for medical education may alleviate the burden of severe health worker shortages and deliver affordable access to high quality medical education. However, diverse challenges in infrastructure and adoption are encountered when implementing e-learning within medical education in particular. Understanding what constitutes successful e-learning is an important first step for determining its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to systematically review e-learning interventions for medical education in LMICs, focusing on their evaluation and assessment methods. Nine databases were searched for publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We included 52 studies with a total of 12,294 participants. Most e-learning interventions were pilot studies (73%), which mainly employed summative assessments of study participants (83%) and evaluated the e-learning intervention with questionnaires (45%). Study designs, evaluation and assessment methods showed considerable variation, as did the study quality, evaluation periods, outcome and effectiveness measures. Included studies mainly utilized subjective measures and custom-built evaluation frameworks, which resulted in both low comparability and poor validity. The majority of studies self-concluded that they had had an effective e-learning intervention, thus indicating potential benefits of e-learning for LMICs. However, MERSQI and NOS ratings revealed the low quality of the studies' evidence for comparability, evaluation instrument validity, study outcomes and participant blinding. Many e-learning interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-termed pilots. More rigorous evaluation methods for e-learning implementations in LMICs are needed to understand the strengths and shortcomings of e-learning for medical education in low-resource contexts. Valid and reliable evaluations are the foundation to guide and improve e-learning interventions, increase their sustainability, alleviate shortages in health care workers and improve the quality of medical care in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7291921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72919212020-06-17 Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review Barteit, Sandra Guzek, Dorota Jahn, Albrecht Bärnighausen, Till Jorge, Margarida Mendes Neuhann, Florian Comput Educ Article In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), e-learning for medical education may alleviate the burden of severe health worker shortages and deliver affordable access to high quality medical education. However, diverse challenges in infrastructure and adoption are encountered when implementing e-learning within medical education in particular. Understanding what constitutes successful e-learning is an important first step for determining its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to systematically review e-learning interventions for medical education in LMICs, focusing on their evaluation and assessment methods. Nine databases were searched for publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We included 52 studies with a total of 12,294 participants. Most e-learning interventions were pilot studies (73%), which mainly employed summative assessments of study participants (83%) and evaluated the e-learning intervention with questionnaires (45%). Study designs, evaluation and assessment methods showed considerable variation, as did the study quality, evaluation periods, outcome and effectiveness measures. Included studies mainly utilized subjective measures and custom-built evaluation frameworks, which resulted in both low comparability and poor validity. The majority of studies self-concluded that they had had an effective e-learning intervention, thus indicating potential benefits of e-learning for LMICs. However, MERSQI and NOS ratings revealed the low quality of the studies' evidence for comparability, evaluation instrument validity, study outcomes and participant blinding. Many e-learning interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-termed pilots. More rigorous evaluation methods for e-learning implementations in LMICs are needed to understand the strengths and shortcomings of e-learning for medical education in low-resource contexts. Valid and reliable evaluations are the foundation to guide and improve e-learning interventions, increase their sustainability, alleviate shortages in health care workers and improve the quality of medical care in LMICs. Pergamon Press 2020-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7291921/ /pubmed/32565611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barteit, Sandra
Guzek, Dorota
Jahn, Albrecht
Bärnighausen, Till
Jorge, Margarida Mendes
Neuhann, Florian
Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_full Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_fullStr Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_short Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review
title_sort evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7291921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726
work_keys_str_mv AT barteitsandra evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT guzekdorota evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT jahnalbrecht evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT barnighausentill evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT jorgemargaridamendes evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT neuhannflorian evaluationofelearningformedicaleducationinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview