Cargando…

In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling

BACKGROUND: In vitro experiments using radiolabeled molecules is fundamental for Positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracer development and various metabolic assays, but no consensus on appropriate incubation conditions exists. Specifically, the u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Busk, Morten, Horsman, Michael R., Overgaard, Jens, Jakobsen, Steen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-020-00099-5
_version_ 1783546729947201536
author Busk, Morten
Horsman, Michael R.
Overgaard, Jens
Jakobsen, Steen
author_facet Busk, Morten
Horsman, Michael R.
Overgaard, Jens
Jakobsen, Steen
author_sort Busk, Morten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In vitro experiments using radiolabeled molecules is fundamental for Positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracer development and various metabolic assays, but no consensus on appropriate incubation conditions exists. Specifically, the use of shaking versus non-shaking conditions, cell number to medium volume and the choice of cell plating material may unintentionally influence cellular oxygenation and medium composition. This is problematic when testing the oxygen-dependence of tracers including (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) and hypoxia-selective 2-nitroimidazoles (e.g., (18)F-fluoroazomycin-arabinoside, [(18)F]FAZA) or when doing prolonged experiments. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of various experimental conditions on tracer retention. METHODS: Tumor cells were seeded in a) Glass or standard Polystyrene Petri dishes or as b) discrete droplets in polystyrene Petri dishes or on 9 mm glass coverslips positioned in glass Petri dishes. When confluent, cells were pre-equilibrated for 2 h to 21%, 0.5% or 0% O(2) and [(18)F] FDG or [(18)F] FAZA was added, followed by cell harvest and analysis of radioactivity 1 h ([(18)F]FDG) or 3 h ([(18)F]FAZA) after. Experiments were conducted with/without orbital shaking. RESULTS: The influence of hypoxia on tracer retention varied widely among cell lines, but shaking-induced convection did not influence uptake. In contrast, hypoxia-driven [(18)F] FAZA, and to some extent [(18)F] FDG, retention was much lower in cells grown on polyethylene than glass. Scaling-down the number of cells did not compromise accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Tracer retention was similar under stagnant and forced convection conditions suggesting that the former approach may be appropriate even when accurate control of oxygen and tracer availability is required. In contrast, conventional plasticware should be used with caution when studying tracers and drugs that are metabolized and retained or activated at low O(2) levels. Downscaling of cell number, by reducing the effective growth area, was feasible, without compromising accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7295868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-72958682020-06-19 In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling Busk, Morten Horsman, Michael R. Overgaard, Jens Jakobsen, Steen EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem Research Article BACKGROUND: In vitro experiments using radiolabeled molecules is fundamental for Positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) tracer development and various metabolic assays, but no consensus on appropriate incubation conditions exists. Specifically, the use of shaking versus non-shaking conditions, cell number to medium volume and the choice of cell plating material may unintentionally influence cellular oxygenation and medium composition. This is problematic when testing the oxygen-dependence of tracers including (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) and hypoxia-selective 2-nitroimidazoles (e.g., (18)F-fluoroazomycin-arabinoside, [(18)F]FAZA) or when doing prolonged experiments. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of various experimental conditions on tracer retention. METHODS: Tumor cells were seeded in a) Glass or standard Polystyrene Petri dishes or as b) discrete droplets in polystyrene Petri dishes or on 9 mm glass coverslips positioned in glass Petri dishes. When confluent, cells were pre-equilibrated for 2 h to 21%, 0.5% or 0% O(2) and [(18)F] FDG or [(18)F] FAZA was added, followed by cell harvest and analysis of radioactivity 1 h ([(18)F]FDG) or 3 h ([(18)F]FAZA) after. Experiments were conducted with/without orbital shaking. RESULTS: The influence of hypoxia on tracer retention varied widely among cell lines, but shaking-induced convection did not influence uptake. In contrast, hypoxia-driven [(18)F] FAZA, and to some extent [(18)F] FDG, retention was much lower in cells grown on polyethylene than glass. Scaling-down the number of cells did not compromise accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Tracer retention was similar under stagnant and forced convection conditions suggesting that the former approach may be appropriate even when accurate control of oxygen and tracer availability is required. In contrast, conventional plasticware should be used with caution when studying tracers and drugs that are metabolized and retained or activated at low O(2) levels. Downscaling of cell number, by reducing the effective growth area, was feasible, without compromising accuracy. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7295868/ /pubmed/32542416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-020-00099-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Busk, Morten
Horsman, Michael R.
Overgaard, Jens
Jakobsen, Steen
In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title_full In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title_fullStr In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title_full_unstemmed In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title_short In vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)F] FDG and [(18)F] FAZA retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
title_sort in vitro hypoxia responsiveness of [(18)f] fdg and [(18)f] faza retention: influence of shaking versus stagnant conditions, glass versus polystyrene substrata and cell number down-scaling
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41181-020-00099-5
work_keys_str_mv AT buskmorten invitrohypoxiaresponsivenessof18ffdgand18ffazaretentioninfluenceofshakingversusstagnantconditionsglassversuspolystyrenesubstrataandcellnumberdownscaling
AT horsmanmichaelr invitrohypoxiaresponsivenessof18ffdgand18ffazaretentioninfluenceofshakingversusstagnantconditionsglassversuspolystyrenesubstrataandcellnumberdownscaling
AT overgaardjens invitrohypoxiaresponsivenessof18ffdgand18ffazaretentioninfluenceofshakingversusstagnantconditionsglassversuspolystyrenesubstrataandcellnumberdownscaling
AT jakobsensteen invitrohypoxiaresponsivenessof18ffdgand18ffazaretentioninfluenceofshakingversusstagnantconditionsglassversuspolystyrenesubstrataandcellnumberdownscaling