Cargando…

Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma

IMPORTANCE: To compare treatment outcomes among a stent group, ligature group and combined group in eyes with refractory glaucoma. BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been used intra-operatively to restrict the aqueous flow in Baerveldt glaucoma implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PART...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petpiroon, Purit, Vijittrakarnrung, Thanyathorn, Supakontanasan, Wasu, Tantraworasin, Apichat, Suwan, Yanin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606584
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S246905
_version_ 1783549498209861632
author Petpiroon, Purit
Vijittrakarnrung, Thanyathorn
Supakontanasan, Wasu
Tantraworasin, Apichat
Suwan, Yanin
author_facet Petpiroon, Purit
Vijittrakarnrung, Thanyathorn
Supakontanasan, Wasu
Tantraworasin, Apichat
Suwan, Yanin
author_sort Petpiroon, Purit
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: To compare treatment outcomes among a stent group, ligature group and combined group in eyes with refractory glaucoma. BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been used intra-operatively to restrict the aqueous flow in Baerveldt glaucoma implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: All glaucoma patients aged over 18-years old who had Baerveldt implantation in Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between October 2011 and February 2018 were included for analysis. METHODS: Retrospective interventional research was conducted. All glaucoma patients who underwent drainage device implantations were retrospectively reviewed from medical records and divided into three groups: stent group, ligature group, and combined group. The primary outcome was post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and BCVA (logMAR) change. The secondary outcome is treatment failure. Repeated measurements with mixed models and multi-level parametric survival model stratified by propensity score and eye side were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes between stent group and ligature group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment failure between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients with a mean age of 57.11 ± 19.04 years, implanted with Baerveldt tube, were eligible. There were no significant differences between stent and ligature groups in terms of post-operative IOP changes [mean difference with 95% confidence interval = 0.53 (−0.49, +1.55) vs −0.02 (−0.84, +0.81); P = 0.411] and post-operative BCVA (logMAR) change (0.02 (−0.13, +0.18) vs –0.05 (−0.18, +0.07); P = 0.465). The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of treatment failure in ligature group were 2.57 (0.72–9.19) compared with the stent group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a trend toward a better result in the stent group compared with the ligature group. Further research with a larger sample size and randomized control trial is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73111642020-06-29 Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma Petpiroon, Purit Vijittrakarnrung, Thanyathorn Supakontanasan, Wasu Tantraworasin, Apichat Suwan, Yanin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research IMPORTANCE: To compare treatment outcomes among a stent group, ligature group and combined group in eyes with refractory glaucoma. BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been used intra-operatively to restrict the aqueous flow in Baerveldt glaucoma implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: All glaucoma patients aged over 18-years old who had Baerveldt implantation in Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between October 2011 and February 2018 were included for analysis. METHODS: Retrospective interventional research was conducted. All glaucoma patients who underwent drainage device implantations were retrospectively reviewed from medical records and divided into three groups: stent group, ligature group, and combined group. The primary outcome was post-operative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes and BCVA (logMAR) change. The secondary outcome is treatment failure. Repeated measurements with mixed models and multi-level parametric survival model stratified by propensity score and eye side were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes between stent group and ligature group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment failure between two groups. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients with a mean age of 57.11 ± 19.04 years, implanted with Baerveldt tube, were eligible. There were no significant differences between stent and ligature groups in terms of post-operative IOP changes [mean difference with 95% confidence interval = 0.53 (−0.49, +1.55) vs −0.02 (−0.84, +0.81); P = 0.411] and post-operative BCVA (logMAR) change (0.02 (−0.13, +0.18) vs –0.05 (−0.18, +0.07); P = 0.465). The hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of treatment failure in ligature group were 2.57 (0.72–9.19) compared with the stent group. CONCLUSION: This study suggests a trend toward a better result in the stent group compared with the ligature group. Further research with a larger sample size and randomized control trial is warranted. Dove 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7311164/ /pubmed/32606584 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S246905 Text en © 2020 Petpiroon et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Petpiroon, Purit
Vijittrakarnrung, Thanyathorn
Supakontanasan, Wasu
Tantraworasin, Apichat
Suwan, Yanin
Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title_full Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title_fullStr Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title_short Comparison of Two Tube-Modification Techniques in Baerveldt Glaucoma Implantation in Refractory Glaucoma
title_sort comparison of two tube-modification techniques in baerveldt glaucoma implantation in refractory glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32606584
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S246905
work_keys_str_mv AT petpiroonpurit comparisonoftwotubemodificationtechniquesinbaerveldtglaucomaimplantationinrefractoryglaucoma
AT vijittrakarnrungthanyathorn comparisonoftwotubemodificationtechniquesinbaerveldtglaucomaimplantationinrefractoryglaucoma
AT supakontanasanwasu comparisonoftwotubemodificationtechniquesinbaerveldtglaucomaimplantationinrefractoryglaucoma
AT tantraworasinapichat comparisonoftwotubemodificationtechniquesinbaerveldtglaucomaimplantationinrefractoryglaucoma
AT suwanyanin comparisonoftwotubemodificationtechniquesinbaerveldtglaucomaimplantationinrefractoryglaucoma