Cargando…

Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing

[Image: see text] Amyloid β-peptide, the principal component of characteristic cerebral plaques of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is produced through intramembrane proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase. Despite the importance in the pathogenesis of AD, the mechanisms of intram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattarai, Apurba, Devkota, Sujan, Bhattarai, Sanjay, Wolfe, Michael S., Miao, Yinglong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00296
_version_ 1783550762197975040
author Bhattarai, Apurba
Devkota, Sujan
Bhattarai, Sanjay
Wolfe, Michael S.
Miao, Yinglong
author_facet Bhattarai, Apurba
Devkota, Sujan
Bhattarai, Sanjay
Wolfe, Michael S.
Miao, Yinglong
author_sort Bhattarai, Apurba
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Amyloid β-peptide, the principal component of characteristic cerebral plaques of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is produced through intramembrane proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase. Despite the importance in the pathogenesis of AD, the mechanisms of intramembrane proteolysis and substrate processing by γ-secretase remain poorly understood. Here, complementary all-atom simulations using a robust Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) method and biochemical experiments were combined to investigate substrate processing of wildtype and mutant APP by γ-secretase. The GaMD simulations captured spontaneous activation of γ-secretase, with hydrogen bonded catalytic aspartates and water poised for proteolysis of APP at the ε cleavage site. Furthermore, GaMD simulations revealed that familial AD mutations I45F and T48P enhanced the initial ε cleavage between residues Leu49–Val50, while M51F mutation shifted the ε cleavage site to the amide bond between Thr48–Leu49. Detailed analysis of the GaMD simulations allowed us to identify distinct low-energy conformational states of γ-secretase, different secondary structures of the wildtype and mutant APP substrate, and important active-site subpockets for catalytic function of the enzyme. The simulation findings were highly consistent with experimental analyses of APP proteolytic products using mass spectrometry and Western blotting. Taken together, the GaMD simulations and biochemical experiments have enabled us to elucidate the mechanisms of γ-secretase activation and substrate processing, which should facilitate rational computer-aided drug design targeting this functionally important enzyme.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73180722020-06-29 Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing Bhattarai, Apurba Devkota, Sujan Bhattarai, Sanjay Wolfe, Michael S. Miao, Yinglong ACS Cent Sci [Image: see text] Amyloid β-peptide, the principal component of characteristic cerebral plaques of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), is produced through intramembrane proteolysis of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by γ-secretase. Despite the importance in the pathogenesis of AD, the mechanisms of intramembrane proteolysis and substrate processing by γ-secretase remain poorly understood. Here, complementary all-atom simulations using a robust Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) method and biochemical experiments were combined to investigate substrate processing of wildtype and mutant APP by γ-secretase. The GaMD simulations captured spontaneous activation of γ-secretase, with hydrogen bonded catalytic aspartates and water poised for proteolysis of APP at the ε cleavage site. Furthermore, GaMD simulations revealed that familial AD mutations I45F and T48P enhanced the initial ε cleavage between residues Leu49–Val50, while M51F mutation shifted the ε cleavage site to the amide bond between Thr48–Leu49. Detailed analysis of the GaMD simulations allowed us to identify distinct low-energy conformational states of γ-secretase, different secondary structures of the wildtype and mutant APP substrate, and important active-site subpockets for catalytic function of the enzyme. The simulation findings were highly consistent with experimental analyses of APP proteolytic products using mass spectrometry and Western blotting. Taken together, the GaMD simulations and biochemical experiments have enabled us to elucidate the mechanisms of γ-secretase activation and substrate processing, which should facilitate rational computer-aided drug design targeting this functionally important enzyme. American Chemical Society 2020-06-04 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7318072/ /pubmed/32607444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00296 Text en Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Bhattarai, Apurba
Devkota, Sujan
Bhattarai, Sanjay
Wolfe, Michael S.
Miao, Yinglong
Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title_full Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title_fullStr Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title_full_unstemmed Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title_short Mechanisms of γ-Secretase Activation and Substrate Processing
title_sort mechanisms of γ-secretase activation and substrate processing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00296
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattaraiapurba mechanismsofgsecretaseactivationandsubstrateprocessing
AT devkotasujan mechanismsofgsecretaseactivationandsubstrateprocessing
AT bhattaraisanjay mechanismsofgsecretaseactivationandsubstrateprocessing
AT wolfemichaels mechanismsofgsecretaseactivationandsubstrateprocessing
AT miaoyinglong mechanismsofgsecretaseactivationandsubstrateprocessing