Cargando…
Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31610100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746 |
_version_ | 1783550787564077056 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Lucy Ryan, Michael Harnett, Mark Atiee, George J. Reines, Scott A. |
author_facet | Lu, Lucy Ryan, Michael Harnett, Mark Atiee, George J. Reines, Scott A. |
author_sort | Lu, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1, open‐label, single investigational center, 3‐treatment, 3‐period, multidose crossover study, we compared 2 novel IV dosing regimens (IV tramadol 75 mg and IV tramadol 50 mg) to oral tramadol 100 mg given every 6 hours (the highest approved oral dosage in the United States) Compared to the oral regimen, IV tramadol 50 mg administered at hours 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 hours thereafter reached initial tramadol peak serum concentration (C(max)) more rapidly, while resulting in similar overall steady‐state C(max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve. IV tramadol 75 mg administered at hours 0, 3, and 6 and every 6 hours thereafter had higher C(max) and greater fluctuation in peak to trough tramadol concentration. The primary metabolite M1 (a potent μ agonist) had lower area under the plasma concentration–time curve and C(max) for both IV regimens than for the oral regimen. IV tramadol at both doses was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles consistent with the known pharmacological effects of tramadol. IV tramadol 50 mg is now in phase 3 development in patients with postsurgical pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7318183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73181832020-06-29 Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study Lu, Lucy Ryan, Michael Harnett, Mark Atiee, George J. Reines, Scott A. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Brief Report Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1, open‐label, single investigational center, 3‐treatment, 3‐period, multidose crossover study, we compared 2 novel IV dosing regimens (IV tramadol 75 mg and IV tramadol 50 mg) to oral tramadol 100 mg given every 6 hours (the highest approved oral dosage in the United States) Compared to the oral regimen, IV tramadol 50 mg administered at hours 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 hours thereafter reached initial tramadol peak serum concentration (C(max)) more rapidly, while resulting in similar overall steady‐state C(max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve. IV tramadol 75 mg administered at hours 0, 3, and 6 and every 6 hours thereafter had higher C(max) and greater fluctuation in peak to trough tramadol concentration. The primary metabolite M1 (a potent μ agonist) had lower area under the plasma concentration–time curve and C(max) for both IV regimens than for the oral regimen. IV tramadol at both doses was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles consistent with the known pharmacological effects of tramadol. IV tramadol 50 mg is now in phase 3 development in patients with postsurgical pain. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7318183/ /pubmed/31610100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746 Text en © 2019 Avenue Therapeutics. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Lu, Lucy Ryan, Michael Harnett, Mark Atiee, George J. Reines, Scott A. Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title | Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title_full | Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title_fullStr | Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title_short | Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study |
title_sort | comparing the pharmacokinetics of 2 novel intravenous tramadol dosing regimens to oral tramadol: a randomized 3‐arm crossover study |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31610100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lulucy comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy AT ryanmichael comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy AT harnettmark comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy AT atieegeorgej comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy AT reinesscotta comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy |