Cargando…

Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study

Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Lucy, Ryan, Michael, Harnett, Mark, Atiee, George J., Reines, Scott A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31610100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746
_version_ 1783550787564077056
author Lu, Lucy
Ryan, Michael
Harnett, Mark
Atiee, George J.
Reines, Scott A.
author_facet Lu, Lucy
Ryan, Michael
Harnett, Mark
Atiee, George J.
Reines, Scott A.
author_sort Lu, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1, open‐label, single investigational center, 3‐treatment, 3‐period, multidose crossover study, we compared 2 novel IV dosing regimens (IV tramadol 75 mg and IV tramadol 50 mg) to oral tramadol 100 mg given every 6 hours (the highest approved oral dosage in the United States) Compared to the oral regimen, IV tramadol 50 mg administered at hours 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 hours thereafter reached initial tramadol peak serum concentration (C(max)) more rapidly, while resulting in similar overall steady‐state C(max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve. IV tramadol 75 mg administered at hours 0, 3, and 6 and every 6 hours thereafter had higher C(max) and greater fluctuation in peak to trough tramadol concentration. The primary metabolite M1 (a potent μ agonist) had lower area under the plasma concentration–time curve and C(max) for both IV regimens than for the oral regimen. IV tramadol at both doses was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles consistent with the known pharmacological effects of tramadol. IV tramadol 50 mg is now in phase 3 development in patients with postsurgical pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7318183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73181832020-06-29 Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study Lu, Lucy Ryan, Michael Harnett, Mark Atiee, George J. Reines, Scott A. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Brief Report Tramadol is a dual‐mechanism (opiate and monoamine reuptake inhibition) analgesic. Intravenous (IV) tramadol has been widely prescribed outside the United States. However, there have not been studies comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV dosing regimens to that of oral tramadol. In this phase 1, open‐label, single investigational center, 3‐treatment, 3‐period, multidose crossover study, we compared 2 novel IV dosing regimens (IV tramadol 75 mg and IV tramadol 50 mg) to oral tramadol 100 mg given every 6 hours (the highest approved oral dosage in the United States) Compared to the oral regimen, IV tramadol 50 mg administered at hours 0, 2, and 4 and every 4 hours thereafter reached initial tramadol peak serum concentration (C(max)) more rapidly, while resulting in similar overall steady‐state C(max) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve. IV tramadol 75 mg administered at hours 0, 3, and 6 and every 6 hours thereafter had higher C(max) and greater fluctuation in peak to trough tramadol concentration. The primary metabolite M1 (a potent μ agonist) had lower area under the plasma concentration–time curve and C(max) for both IV regimens than for the oral regimen. IV tramadol at both doses was well tolerated, with adverse event profiles consistent with the known pharmacological effects of tramadol. IV tramadol 50 mg is now in phase 3 development in patients with postsurgical pain. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7318183/ /pubmed/31610100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746 Text en © 2019 Avenue Therapeutics. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Lu, Lucy
Ryan, Michael
Harnett, Mark
Atiee, George J.
Reines, Scott A.
Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title_full Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title_fullStr Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title_short Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of 2 Novel Intravenous Tramadol Dosing Regimens to Oral Tramadol: A Randomized 3‐Arm Crossover Study
title_sort comparing the pharmacokinetics of 2 novel intravenous tramadol dosing regimens to oral tramadol: a randomized 3‐arm crossover study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31610100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.746
work_keys_str_mv AT lulucy comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy
AT ryanmichael comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy
AT harnettmark comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy
AT atieegeorgej comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy
AT reinesscotta comparingthepharmacokineticsof2novelintravenoustramadoldosingregimenstooraltramadolarandomized3armcrossoverstudy