Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the so-called Computer Human Interaction (CHI) co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Besançon, Lonni, Rönnberg, Niklas, Löwgren, Jonas, Tennant, Jonathan P., Cooper, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z

Ejemplares similares