Cargando…
Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing
BACKGROUND: Our aim is to highlight the benefits and limitations of open and non-anonymized peer review. Our argument is based on the literature and on responses to a survey on the reviewing process of alt.chi, a more or less open review track within the so-called Computer Human Interaction (CHI) co...
Autores principales: | Besançon, Lonni, Rönnberg, Niklas, Löwgren, Jonas, Tennant, Jonathan P., Cooper, Matthew |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Double Anonymity and the Peer Review Process
por: Brown, Richard J.C.
Publicado: (2006) -
The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior
por: Park, Soowon, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Open tools for quantitative anonymization of tabular phenotype data: literature review
por: Haber, Anna C, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Open access, open data and peer review
por: Ule, Jernej
Publicado: (2020)