Cargando…
Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173 |
_version_ | 1783551621589893120 |
---|---|
author | Barua, Subit Wang, Gary Mansukhani, Mahesh Hsiao, Susan Fernandes, Helen |
author_facet | Barua, Subit Wang, Gary Mansukhani, Mahesh Hsiao, Susan Fernandes, Helen |
author_sort | Barua, Subit |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations. DESIGN: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines. RESULTS: For the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time. CONCLUSIONS: The validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7322345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73223452020-06-30 Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel Barua, Subit Wang, Gary Mansukhani, Mahesh Hsiao, Susan Fernandes, Helen Pract Lab Med Article OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations. DESIGN: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines. RESULTS: For the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time. CONCLUSIONS: The validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time. Elsevier 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7322345/ /pubmed/32613069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Barua, Subit Wang, Gary Mansukhani, Mahesh Hsiao, Susan Fernandes, Helen Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title | Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title_full | Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title_fullStr | Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title_full_unstemmed | Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title_short | Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel |
title_sort | key considerations for comprehensive validation of an rna fusion ngs panel |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baruasubit keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel AT wanggary keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel AT mansukhanimahesh keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel AT hsiaosusan keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel AT fernandeshelen keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel |