Cargando…

Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel

OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barua, Subit, Wang, Gary, Mansukhani, Mahesh, Hsiao, Susan, Fernandes, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173
_version_ 1783551621589893120
author Barua, Subit
Wang, Gary
Mansukhani, Mahesh
Hsiao, Susan
Fernandes, Helen
author_facet Barua, Subit
Wang, Gary
Mansukhani, Mahesh
Hsiao, Susan
Fernandes, Helen
author_sort Barua, Subit
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations. DESIGN: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines. RESULTS: For the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time. CONCLUSIONS: The validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7322345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73223452020-06-30 Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel Barua, Subit Wang, Gary Mansukhani, Mahesh Hsiao, Susan Fernandes, Helen Pract Lab Med Article OBJECTIVES: Validation of RNA-based NGS assays for the detection of therapeutically targetable gene fusions is challenging. Here, we report systematic validation and quality control monitoring of our targeted fusion panel for the detection of 17 clinically relevant fusion transcripts across several tumor types. We implemented this RNA Fusion Panel as a reflex test for tumors lacking DNA driver mutations. DESIGN: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh-frozen lung, brain, soft tissue and skin tumors were used to determine the accuracy of the assay. Additional fusion-positive specimens and a calibrated reference standard were used to establish the precision, reproducibility and sensitivity of the assay. All aspects of the validation, including quality control metrics, were performed according to New York State guidelines. RESULTS: For the RNA fusion panel, accuracy, reproducibility and precision studies were above 99%. Reproducibility and sensitivity studies with the reference standard were helpful in identifying inconsistencies. The limit of detection for most RNA fusion transcripts was 50 copies. Application of the RNA fusion assay as a reflex test to 450 tumor samples lacking DNA driver mutations resulted in a 10% increase in diagnostic yield with minimal additional processing time. CONCLUSIONS: The validated RNA fusion panel provides clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors. By using a sequential testing approach, the RNA fusion assay complements the DNA hotspot assay in identifying clinically relevant variants across many tumor types with minimal additional increase in processing time. Elsevier 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7322345/ /pubmed/32613069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barua, Subit
Wang, Gary
Mansukhani, Mahesh
Hsiao, Susan
Fernandes, Helen
Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title_full Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title_fullStr Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title_full_unstemmed Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title_short Key considerations for comprehensive validation of an RNA fusion NGS panel
title_sort key considerations for comprehensive validation of an rna fusion ngs panel
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32613069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2020.e00173
work_keys_str_mv AT baruasubit keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel
AT wanggary keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel
AT mansukhanimahesh keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel
AT hsiaosusan keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel
AT fernandeshelen keyconsiderationsforcomprehensivevalidationofanrnafusionngspanel