Cargando…

AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity

Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelbaki, Ahmed, Akman, H. Begum, Poteau, Marion, Grant, Rhys, Gavet, Olivier, Guarguaglini, Giulia, Lindon, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071
_version_ 1783552687788261376
author Abdelbaki, Ahmed
Akman, H. Begum
Poteau, Marion
Grant, Rhys
Gavet, Olivier
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Lindon, Catherine
author_facet Abdelbaki, Ahmed
Akman, H. Begum
Poteau, Marion
Grant, Rhys
Gavet, Olivier
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Lindon, Catherine
author_sort Abdelbaki, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1. We used FZR1 knockout cells (FZR1(KO)) and a novel FRET-based AURKA biosensor to investigate how AURKA activity is regulated in the absence of destruction. We found that AURKA activity in FZR1(KO) cells dropped at mitotic exit as rapidly as in parental cells, despite absence of AURKA destruction. Unexpectedly, TPX2 was degraded normally in FZR1(KO) cells. Overexpression of an N-terminal TPX2 fragment sufficient for AURKA binding, but that is not degraded at mitotic exit, caused delay in AURKA inactivation. We conclude that inactivation of AURKA at mitotic exit is determined not by AURKA degradation but by degradation of TPX2 and therefore is dependent on CDC20 rather than FZR1. The biosensor revealed that FZR1 instead suppresses AURKA activity in interphase and is critically required for assembly of the interphase mitochondrial network after mitosis. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first authors of the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7328152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73281522020-07-10 AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity Abdelbaki, Ahmed Akman, H. Begum Poteau, Marion Grant, Rhys Gavet, Olivier Guarguaglini, Giulia Lindon, Catherine J Cell Sci Research Article Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1. We used FZR1 knockout cells (FZR1(KO)) and a novel FRET-based AURKA biosensor to investigate how AURKA activity is regulated in the absence of destruction. We found that AURKA activity in FZR1(KO) cells dropped at mitotic exit as rapidly as in parental cells, despite absence of AURKA destruction. Unexpectedly, TPX2 was degraded normally in FZR1(KO) cells. Overexpression of an N-terminal TPX2 fragment sufficient for AURKA binding, but that is not degraded at mitotic exit, caused delay in AURKA inactivation. We conclude that inactivation of AURKA at mitotic exit is determined not by AURKA degradation but by degradation of TPX2 and therefore is dependent on CDC20 rather than FZR1. The biosensor revealed that FZR1 instead suppresses AURKA activity in interphase and is critically required for assembly of the interphase mitochondrial network after mitosis. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first authors of the paper. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7328152/ /pubmed/32393600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071 Text en © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Abdelbaki, Ahmed
Akman, H. Begum
Poteau, Marion
Grant, Rhys
Gavet, Olivier
Guarguaglini, Giulia
Lindon, Catherine
AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title_full AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title_fullStr AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title_full_unstemmed AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title_short AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
title_sort aurka destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelbakiahmed aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT akmanhbegum aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT poteaumarion aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT grantrhys aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT gavetolivier aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT guarguaglinigiulia aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity
AT lindoncatherine aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity