Cargando…
AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity
Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Company of Biologists Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071 |
_version_ | 1783552687788261376 |
---|---|
author | Abdelbaki, Ahmed Akman, H. Begum Poteau, Marion Grant, Rhys Gavet, Olivier Guarguaglini, Giulia Lindon, Catherine |
author_facet | Abdelbaki, Ahmed Akman, H. Begum Poteau, Marion Grant, Rhys Gavet, Olivier Guarguaglini, Giulia Lindon, Catherine |
author_sort | Abdelbaki, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1. We used FZR1 knockout cells (FZR1(KO)) and a novel FRET-based AURKA biosensor to investigate how AURKA activity is regulated in the absence of destruction. We found that AURKA activity in FZR1(KO) cells dropped at mitotic exit as rapidly as in parental cells, despite absence of AURKA destruction. Unexpectedly, TPX2 was degraded normally in FZR1(KO) cells. Overexpression of an N-terminal TPX2 fragment sufficient for AURKA binding, but that is not degraded at mitotic exit, caused delay in AURKA inactivation. We conclude that inactivation of AURKA at mitotic exit is determined not by AURKA degradation but by degradation of TPX2 and therefore is dependent on CDC20 rather than FZR1. The biosensor revealed that FZR1 instead suppresses AURKA activity in interphase and is critically required for assembly of the interphase mitochondrial network after mitosis. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first authors of the paper. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7328152 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Company of Biologists Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73281522020-07-10 AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity Abdelbaki, Ahmed Akman, H. Begum Poteau, Marion Grant, Rhys Gavet, Olivier Guarguaglini, Giulia Lindon, Catherine J Cell Sci Research Article Activity of AURKA is controlled through multiple mechanisms including phosphorylation, ubiquitin-mediated degradation and allosteric interaction with TPX2. Activity peaks at mitosis, before AURKA is degraded during and after mitotic exit in a process strictly dependent on the APC/C coactivator FZR1. We used FZR1 knockout cells (FZR1(KO)) and a novel FRET-based AURKA biosensor to investigate how AURKA activity is regulated in the absence of destruction. We found that AURKA activity in FZR1(KO) cells dropped at mitotic exit as rapidly as in parental cells, despite absence of AURKA destruction. Unexpectedly, TPX2 was degraded normally in FZR1(KO) cells. Overexpression of an N-terminal TPX2 fragment sufficient for AURKA binding, but that is not degraded at mitotic exit, caused delay in AURKA inactivation. We conclude that inactivation of AURKA at mitotic exit is determined not by AURKA degradation but by degradation of TPX2 and therefore is dependent on CDC20 rather than FZR1. The biosensor revealed that FZR1 instead suppresses AURKA activity in interphase and is critically required for assembly of the interphase mitochondrial network after mitosis. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first authors of the paper. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7328152/ /pubmed/32393600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071 Text en © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdelbaki, Ahmed Akman, H. Begum Poteau, Marion Grant, Rhys Gavet, Olivier Guarguaglini, Giulia Lindon, Catherine AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title | AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title_full | AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title_fullStr | AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title_full_unstemmed | AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title_short | AURKA destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
title_sort | aurka destruction is decoupled from its activity at mitotic exit but is essential to suppress interphase activity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7328152/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.243071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelbakiahmed aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT akmanhbegum aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT poteaumarion aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT grantrhys aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT gavetolivier aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT guarguaglinigiulia aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity AT lindoncatherine aurkadestructionisdecoupledfromitsactivityatmitoticexitbutisessentialtosuppressinterphaseactivity |