Cargando…
In vitro inhibition of human cytochrome P450 enzymes by the novel atypical antipsychotic drug asenapine: a prediction of possible drug–drug interactions
BACKGROUND: Inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is the most common cause of harmful drug–drug interactions. The present study aimed at examining the inhibitory effect of the novel antipsychotic drug asenapine on the main CYP enzymes in human liver. METHODS: The experiments were performed in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7329795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32219694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43440-020-00089-z |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is the most common cause of harmful drug–drug interactions. The present study aimed at examining the inhibitory effect of the novel antipsychotic drug asenapine on the main CYP enzymes in human liver. METHODS: The experiments were performed in vitro using pooled human liver microsomes and the human cDNA-expressed CYP enzymes: CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 (Supersomes). Activities of CYP enzymes were determined using the CYP-specific reactions: caffeine 3-N-demethylation (CYP1A2), diclofenac 4′-hydroxylation (CYP2C9), perazine N-demethylation (CYP2C19), bufuralol 1′-hydroxylation (CYP2D6), and testosterone 6β-hydroxylation (CYP3A4). The rates of the CYP-specific reactions were assessed in the absence and presence of asenapine using HPLC. RESULTS: The obtained results showed that both in human liver microsomes and Supersomes asenapine potently and to a similar degree inhibited the activity of CYP1A2 via a mixed mechanism (K(i) = 3.2 μM in liver microsomes and Supersomes) and CYP2D6 via a competitive mechanism (K(i) = 1.75 and 1.89 μM in microsomes and Supersomes, respectively). Moreover, asenapine attenuated the CYP3A4 activity via a non-competitive mechanism (K(i) = 31.3 and 27.3 μM in microsomes and Supersomes, respectively). In contrast, asenapine did not affect the activity of CYP2C9 or CYP2C19. CONCLUSION: The potent inhibition of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 by asenapine, demonstrated in vitro, will most probably be observed also in vivo, since the calculated K(i) values are close to the presumed concentration range for asenapine in the liver in vivo. Therefore, pharmacokinetic interactions involving asenapine and CYP2D6 or CYP1A2 substrates are likely to occur during their co-administration to patients. |
---|