Cargando…
Running field experiments using Facebook split test
Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcom...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053 |
_version_ | 1783553349926256640 |
---|---|
author | Orazi, Davide C. Johnston, Allen C. |
author_facet | Orazi, Davide C. Johnston, Allen C. |
author_sort | Orazi, Davide C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcome these issues but are traditionally time- and resource-consuming. This primer presents an alternative experimental setting to conduct online field experiments in a time- and cost-effective way. It does so by introducing the Facebook A/B split test functionality, which allows for random assignment of manipulated variables embedded in ecologically-valid stimuli. We compare and contrast this method against laboratory settings and Amazon Mechanical Turk in terms of design flexibility, managerial relevance, data quality control, and sample representativeness. We then provide an empirical demonstration of how to set up, pre-test, run, and analyze FBST experiments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7331542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73315422020-07-06 Running field experiments using Facebook split test Orazi, Davide C. Johnston, Allen C. J Bus Res Article Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcome these issues but are traditionally time- and resource-consuming. This primer presents an alternative experimental setting to conduct online field experiments in a time- and cost-effective way. It does so by introducing the Facebook A/B split test functionality, which allows for random assignment of manipulated variables embedded in ecologically-valid stimuli. We compare and contrast this method against laboratory settings and Amazon Mechanical Turk in terms of design flexibility, managerial relevance, data quality control, and sample representativeness. We then provide an empirical demonstration of how to set up, pre-test, run, and analyze FBST experiments. Elsevier Inc. 2020-09 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7331542/ /pubmed/32834210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Orazi, Davide C. Johnston, Allen C. Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title | Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title_full | Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title_fullStr | Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title_full_unstemmed | Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title_short | Running field experiments using Facebook split test |
title_sort | running field experiments using facebook split test |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orazidavidec runningfieldexperimentsusingfacebooksplittest AT johnstonallenc runningfieldexperimentsusingfacebooksplittest |