Cargando…

Running field experiments using Facebook split test

Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orazi, Davide C., Johnston, Allen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053
_version_ 1783553349926256640
author Orazi, Davide C.
Johnston, Allen C.
author_facet Orazi, Davide C.
Johnston, Allen C.
author_sort Orazi, Davide C.
collection PubMed
description Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcome these issues but are traditionally time- and resource-consuming. This primer presents an alternative experimental setting to conduct online field experiments in a time- and cost-effective way. It does so by introducing the Facebook A/B split test functionality, which allows for random assignment of manipulated variables embedded in ecologically-valid stimuli. We compare and contrast this method against laboratory settings and Amazon Mechanical Turk in terms of design flexibility, managerial relevance, data quality control, and sample representativeness. We then provide an empirical demonstration of how to set up, pre-test, run, and analyze FBST experiments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7331542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73315422020-07-06 Running field experiments using Facebook split test Orazi, Davide C. Johnston, Allen C. J Bus Res Article Business researchers use experimental methods extensively due to their high internal validity. However, controlled laboratory and crowdsourcing settings often introduce issues of artificiality, data contamination, and low managerial relevance of the dependent variables. Field experiments can overcome these issues but are traditionally time- and resource-consuming. This primer presents an alternative experimental setting to conduct online field experiments in a time- and cost-effective way. It does so by introducing the Facebook A/B split test functionality, which allows for random assignment of manipulated variables embedded in ecologically-valid stimuli. We compare and contrast this method against laboratory settings and Amazon Mechanical Turk in terms of design flexibility, managerial relevance, data quality control, and sample representativeness. We then provide an empirical demonstration of how to set up, pre-test, run, and analyze FBST experiments. Elsevier Inc. 2020-09 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7331542/ /pubmed/32834210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Orazi, Davide C.
Johnston, Allen C.
Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title_full Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title_fullStr Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title_full_unstemmed Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title_short Running field experiments using Facebook split test
title_sort running field experiments using facebook split test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7331542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32834210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.053
work_keys_str_mv AT orazidavidec runningfieldexperimentsusingfacebooksplittest
AT johnstonallenc runningfieldexperimentsusingfacebooksplittest