Cargando…
Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering
Protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions often involve conformational changes or structural rearrangements that can be quantified by solution small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). These scattering intensity measurements reveal structural details of the bound complex, the number of species invo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252520004169 |
_version_ | 1783555016262418432 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Po-chia Masiewicz, Pawel Perez, Kathryn Hennig, Janosch |
author_facet | Chen, Po-chia Masiewicz, Pawel Perez, Kathryn Hennig, Janosch |
author_sort | Chen, Po-chia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions often involve conformational changes or structural rearrangements that can be quantified by solution small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). These scattering intensity measurements reveal structural details of the bound complex, the number of species involved and, additionally, the strength of interactions if carried out as a titration. Although a core part of structural biology workflows, SAXS-based titrations are not commonly used in drug discovery contexts. This is because prior knowledge of expected sample requirements, throughput and prediction accuracy is needed to develop reliable ligand screens. This study presents the use of the histidine-binding protein (26 kDa) and other periplasmic binding proteins to benchmark ligand screen performance. Sample concentrations and exposure times were varied across multiple screening trials at four beamlines to investigate the accuracy and precision of affinity prediction. The volatility ratio between titrated scattering curves and a common apo reference is found to most reliably capture the extent of structural and population changes. This obviates the need to explicitly model scattering intensities of bound complexes, which can be strongly ligand-dependent. Where the dissociation constant is within 10(2) of the protein concentration and the total exposure times exceed 20 s, the titration protocol presented at 0.5 mg ml(−1) yields affinities comparable to isothermal titration calorimetry measurements. Estimated throughput ranges between 20 and 100 ligand titrations per day at current synchrotron beamlines, with the limiting step imposed by sample handling and cleaning procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7340254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73402542020-07-20 Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering Chen, Po-chia Masiewicz, Pawel Perez, Kathryn Hennig, Janosch IUCrJ Research Papers Protein–protein and protein–ligand interactions often involve conformational changes or structural rearrangements that can be quantified by solution small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). These scattering intensity measurements reveal structural details of the bound complex, the number of species involved and, additionally, the strength of interactions if carried out as a titration. Although a core part of structural biology workflows, SAXS-based titrations are not commonly used in drug discovery contexts. This is because prior knowledge of expected sample requirements, throughput and prediction accuracy is needed to develop reliable ligand screens. This study presents the use of the histidine-binding protein (26 kDa) and other periplasmic binding proteins to benchmark ligand screen performance. Sample concentrations and exposure times were varied across multiple screening trials at four beamlines to investigate the accuracy and precision of affinity prediction. The volatility ratio between titrated scattering curves and a common apo reference is found to most reliably capture the extent of structural and population changes. This obviates the need to explicitly model scattering intensities of bound complexes, which can be strongly ligand-dependent. Where the dissociation constant is within 10(2) of the protein concentration and the total exposure times exceed 20 s, the titration protocol presented at 0.5 mg ml(−1) yields affinities comparable to isothermal titration calorimetry measurements. Estimated throughput ranges between 20 and 100 ligand titrations per day at current synchrotron beamlines, with the limiting step imposed by sample handling and cleaning procedures. International Union of Crystallography 2020-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7340254/ /pubmed/32695411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252520004169 Text en © Po-chia Chen et al. 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Chen, Po-chia Masiewicz, Pawel Perez, Kathryn Hennig, Janosch Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title | Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title_full | Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title_fullStr | Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title_full_unstemmed | Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title_short | Structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle X-ray scattering |
title_sort | structure-based screening of binding affinities via small-angle x-ray scattering |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252520004169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenpochia structurebasedscreeningofbindingaffinitiesviasmallanglexrayscattering AT masiewiczpawel structurebasedscreeningofbindingaffinitiesviasmallanglexrayscattering AT perezkathryn structurebasedscreeningofbindingaffinitiesviasmallanglexrayscattering AT hennigjanosch structurebasedscreeningofbindingaffinitiesviasmallanglexrayscattering |