Cargando…

A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum

BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schweyen, Ramona, Al-Nawas, Bilal, Arnold, Christin, Hey, Jeremias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8
_version_ 1783555085110870016
author Schweyen, Ramona
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Arnold, Christin
Hey, Jeremias
author_facet Schweyen, Ramona
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Arnold, Christin
Hey, Jeremias
author_sort Schweyen, Ramona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to the importance of theoretical and practical implant dentistry teaching content in undergraduate dental education. The specific objective was to determine whether a consensus could be found concerning aspects of theoretical knowledge, implant position planning, implantation, prosthetic treatment procedures, postoperative care, and prerequisite experiences that should be provided in undergraduate dental education. RESULTS: A positive consensus existed in terms of theoretical education, assistance in surgical and prosthodontic procedures, implant planning and restoration in straightforward cases (i.e., posterior single crowns and bridges, overdentures on nonconnected implants), and postoperative care. A negative consensus existed for bone augmentation. Implantation was supported by novices (i.e., students and graduates). In addition, more experienced dentists were more likely to oppose implantation performed by undergraduates. The most preferred implantation method was implant insertion using a digitally fabricated drilling template, after surgical flap elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Students and graduates preferred a comprehensive undergraduate education that included implant dentistry. Dentists working in private practice, and especially dentists working as university educators, were critical towards the integration of implant-related learning content into undergraduate education. The intention of medical education is to impart knowledge to students and to prepare them for life-long learning and continual professional development after graduation. Thus, an undergraduate dental curriculum that provides students a solid introduction and knowledge foundation in implant dentistry is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7340723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73407232020-07-13 A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum Schweyen, Ramona Al-Nawas, Bilal Arnold, Christin Hey, Jeremias Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to the importance of theoretical and practical implant dentistry teaching content in undergraduate dental education. The specific objective was to determine whether a consensus could be found concerning aspects of theoretical knowledge, implant position planning, implantation, prosthetic treatment procedures, postoperative care, and prerequisite experiences that should be provided in undergraduate dental education. RESULTS: A positive consensus existed in terms of theoretical education, assistance in surgical and prosthodontic procedures, implant planning and restoration in straightforward cases (i.e., posterior single crowns and bridges, overdentures on nonconnected implants), and postoperative care. A negative consensus existed for bone augmentation. Implantation was supported by novices (i.e., students and graduates). In addition, more experienced dentists were more likely to oppose implantation performed by undergraduates. The most preferred implantation method was implant insertion using a digitally fabricated drilling template, after surgical flap elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Students and graduates preferred a comprehensive undergraduate education that included implant dentistry. Dentists working in private practice, and especially dentists working as university educators, were critical towards the integration of implant-related learning content into undergraduate education. The intention of medical education is to impart knowledge to students and to prepare them for life-long learning and continual professional development after graduation. Thus, an undergraduate dental curriculum that provides students a solid introduction and knowledge foundation in implant dentistry is recommended. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7340723/ /pubmed/32638176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Schweyen, Ramona
Al-Nawas, Bilal
Arnold, Christin
Hey, Jeremias
A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title_full A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title_fullStr A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title_short A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
title_sort cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8
work_keys_str_mv AT schweyenramona acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT alnawasbilal acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT arnoldchristin acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT heyjeremias acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT schweyenramona crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT alnawasbilal crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT arnoldchristin crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum
AT heyjeremias crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum