Cargando…
A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum
BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8 |
_version_ | 1783555085110870016 |
---|---|
author | Schweyen, Ramona Al-Nawas, Bilal Arnold, Christin Hey, Jeremias |
author_facet | Schweyen, Ramona Al-Nawas, Bilal Arnold, Christin Hey, Jeremias |
author_sort | Schweyen, Ramona |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to the importance of theoretical and practical implant dentistry teaching content in undergraduate dental education. The specific objective was to determine whether a consensus could be found concerning aspects of theoretical knowledge, implant position planning, implantation, prosthetic treatment procedures, postoperative care, and prerequisite experiences that should be provided in undergraduate dental education. RESULTS: A positive consensus existed in terms of theoretical education, assistance in surgical and prosthodontic procedures, implant planning and restoration in straightforward cases (i.e., posterior single crowns and bridges, overdentures on nonconnected implants), and postoperative care. A negative consensus existed for bone augmentation. Implantation was supported by novices (i.e., students and graduates). In addition, more experienced dentists were more likely to oppose implantation performed by undergraduates. The most preferred implantation method was implant insertion using a digitally fabricated drilling template, after surgical flap elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Students and graduates preferred a comprehensive undergraduate education that included implant dentistry. Dentists working in private practice, and especially dentists working as university educators, were critical towards the integration of implant-related learning content into undergraduate education. The intention of medical education is to impart knowledge to students and to prepare them for life-long learning and continual professional development after graduation. Thus, an undergraduate dental curriculum that provides students a solid introduction and knowledge foundation in implant dentistry is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7340723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73407232020-07-13 A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum Schweyen, Ramona Al-Nawas, Bilal Arnold, Christin Hey, Jeremias Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: An ongoing debate in dental education is whether implant dentistry, as a multidisciplinary domain, should be integrated into the undergraduate curriculum. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perspectives of novices, clinical educators, and experienced dentists with regard to the importance of theoretical and practical implant dentistry teaching content in undergraduate dental education. The specific objective was to determine whether a consensus could be found concerning aspects of theoretical knowledge, implant position planning, implantation, prosthetic treatment procedures, postoperative care, and prerequisite experiences that should be provided in undergraduate dental education. RESULTS: A positive consensus existed in terms of theoretical education, assistance in surgical and prosthodontic procedures, implant planning and restoration in straightforward cases (i.e., posterior single crowns and bridges, overdentures on nonconnected implants), and postoperative care. A negative consensus existed for bone augmentation. Implantation was supported by novices (i.e., students and graduates). In addition, more experienced dentists were more likely to oppose implantation performed by undergraduates. The most preferred implantation method was implant insertion using a digitally fabricated drilling template, after surgical flap elevation. CONCLUSIONS: Students and graduates preferred a comprehensive undergraduate education that included implant dentistry. Dentists working in private practice, and especially dentists working as university educators, were critical towards the integration of implant-related learning content into undergraduate education. The intention of medical education is to impart knowledge to students and to prepare them for life-long learning and continual professional development after graduation. Thus, an undergraduate dental curriculum that provides students a solid introduction and knowledge foundation in implant dentistry is recommended. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7340723/ /pubmed/32638176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Schweyen, Ramona Al-Nawas, Bilal Arnold, Christin Hey, Jeremias A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title | A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title_full | A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title_fullStr | A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title_short | A cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
title_sort | cross-sectional survey of attitudes towards education in implant dentistry in the undergraduate dental curriculum |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32638176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00224-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schweyenramona acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT alnawasbilal acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT arnoldchristin acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT heyjeremias acrosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT schweyenramona crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT alnawasbilal crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT arnoldchristin crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum AT heyjeremias crosssectionalsurveyofattitudestowardseducationinimplantdentistryintheundergraduatedentalcurriculum |