Cargando…
Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480 |
_version_ | 1783556359850033152 |
---|---|
author | Mocan, Andrei Babotă, Mihai Pop, Anca Fizeșan, Ionel Diuzheva, Alina Locatelli, Marcello Carradori, Simone Campestre, Cristina Menghini, Luigi Sisea, Cristian R. Sokovic, Marina Zengin, Gokhan Păltinean, Ramona Bădărău, Sabin C. Vodnar, Dan Crișan, Gianina |
author_facet | Mocan, Andrei Babotă, Mihai Pop, Anca Fizeșan, Ionel Diuzheva, Alina Locatelli, Marcello Carradori, Simone Campestre, Cristina Menghini, Luigi Sisea, Cristian R. Sokovic, Marina Zengin, Gokhan Păltinean, Ramona Bădărău, Sabin C. Vodnar, Dan Crișan, Gianina |
author_sort | Mocan, Andrei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical profile and potential bioactivities of 70% (v/v) ethanolic extracts obtained from the less-studied S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa in comparison with S. officinalis. HPLC-PDA analysis revealed the presence of rutin and catechin as the main compounds in the extracts of the three studied species (using the employed HPLC method), whereas the presence of naringenin was highlighted only in S. glutinosa extract. Chlorogenic acid, rutin and quercetin were identified and quantified for the first time in S. transsylvanica extracts. The in vitro antioxidant capacity of each extract was tested through complementary methods (phosphomolybdenum assay, DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC and FRAP assays), and correlated with the presence of phenolics (especially flavonoids) in high amounts. The neuroprotective and antidiabetic abilities of S. officinalis (the most active as AChE, BChE and α-glucosidase inhibitor), S. glutinosa (the most active as α-amylase inhibitor) and S. transsylvanica were also studied. For each extract it was determined the antimicrobial, antifungal and cytotoxic effects using in vitro assays. The obtained results confirm the potential of S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa as promising sources of bioactive compounds and as a starting point for further analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7346212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73462122020-07-20 Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur Mocan, Andrei Babotă, Mihai Pop, Anca Fizeșan, Ionel Diuzheva, Alina Locatelli, Marcello Carradori, Simone Campestre, Cristina Menghini, Luigi Sisea, Cristian R. Sokovic, Marina Zengin, Gokhan Păltinean, Ramona Bădărău, Sabin C. Vodnar, Dan Crișan, Gianina Antioxidants (Basel) Article Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical profile and potential bioactivities of 70% (v/v) ethanolic extracts obtained from the less-studied S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa in comparison with S. officinalis. HPLC-PDA analysis revealed the presence of rutin and catechin as the main compounds in the extracts of the three studied species (using the employed HPLC method), whereas the presence of naringenin was highlighted only in S. glutinosa extract. Chlorogenic acid, rutin and quercetin were identified and quantified for the first time in S. transsylvanica extracts. The in vitro antioxidant capacity of each extract was tested through complementary methods (phosphomolybdenum assay, DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC and FRAP assays), and correlated with the presence of phenolics (especially flavonoids) in high amounts. The neuroprotective and antidiabetic abilities of S. officinalis (the most active as AChE, BChE and α-glucosidase inhibitor), S. glutinosa (the most active as α-amylase inhibitor) and S. transsylvanica were also studied. For each extract it was determined the antimicrobial, antifungal and cytotoxic effects using in vitro assays. The obtained results confirm the potential of S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa as promising sources of bioactive compounds and as a starting point for further analyses. MDPI 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7346212/ /pubmed/32498441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mocan, Andrei Babotă, Mihai Pop, Anca Fizeșan, Ionel Diuzheva, Alina Locatelli, Marcello Carradori, Simone Campestre, Cristina Menghini, Luigi Sisea, Cristian R. Sokovic, Marina Zengin, Gokhan Păltinean, Ramona Bădărău, Sabin C. Vodnar, Dan Crișan, Gianina Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title | Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title_full | Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title_fullStr | Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title_short | Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur |
title_sort | chemical constituents and biologic activities of sage species: a comparison between salvia officinalis l., s. glutinosa l. and s. transsylvanica (schur ex griseb. & schenk) schur |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mocanandrei chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT babotamihai chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT popanca chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT fizesanionel chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT diuzhevaalina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT locatellimarcello chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT carradorisimone chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT campestrecristina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT menghiniluigi chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT siseacristianr chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT sokovicmarina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT zengingokhan chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT paltineanramona chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT badarausabin chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT cvodnardan chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur AT crisangianina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur |