Cargando…

Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur

Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mocan, Andrei, Babotă, Mihai, Pop, Anca, Fizeșan, Ionel, Diuzheva, Alina, Locatelli, Marcello, Carradori, Simone, Campestre, Cristina, Menghini, Luigi, Sisea, Cristian R., Sokovic, Marina, Zengin, Gokhan, Păltinean, Ramona, Bădărău, Sabin, C. Vodnar, Dan, Crișan, Gianina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480
_version_ 1783556359850033152
author Mocan, Andrei
Babotă, Mihai
Pop, Anca
Fizeșan, Ionel
Diuzheva, Alina
Locatelli, Marcello
Carradori, Simone
Campestre, Cristina
Menghini, Luigi
Sisea, Cristian R.
Sokovic, Marina
Zengin, Gokhan
Păltinean, Ramona
Bădărău, Sabin
C. Vodnar, Dan
Crișan, Gianina
author_facet Mocan, Andrei
Babotă, Mihai
Pop, Anca
Fizeșan, Ionel
Diuzheva, Alina
Locatelli, Marcello
Carradori, Simone
Campestre, Cristina
Menghini, Luigi
Sisea, Cristian R.
Sokovic, Marina
Zengin, Gokhan
Păltinean, Ramona
Bădărău, Sabin
C. Vodnar, Dan
Crișan, Gianina
author_sort Mocan, Andrei
collection PubMed
description Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical profile and potential bioactivities of 70% (v/v) ethanolic extracts obtained from the less-studied S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa in comparison with S. officinalis. HPLC-PDA analysis revealed the presence of rutin and catechin as the main compounds in the extracts of the three studied species (using the employed HPLC method), whereas the presence of naringenin was highlighted only in S. glutinosa extract. Chlorogenic acid, rutin and quercetin were identified and quantified for the first time in S. transsylvanica extracts. The in vitro antioxidant capacity of each extract was tested through complementary methods (phosphomolybdenum assay, DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC and FRAP assays), and correlated with the presence of phenolics (especially flavonoids) in high amounts. The neuroprotective and antidiabetic abilities of S. officinalis (the most active as AChE, BChE and α-glucosidase inhibitor), S. glutinosa (the most active as α-amylase inhibitor) and S. transsylvanica were also studied. For each extract it was determined the antimicrobial, antifungal and cytotoxic effects using in vitro assays. The obtained results confirm the potential of S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa as promising sources of bioactive compounds and as a starting point for further analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7346212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73462122020-07-20 Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur Mocan, Andrei Babotă, Mihai Pop, Anca Fizeșan, Ionel Diuzheva, Alina Locatelli, Marcello Carradori, Simone Campestre, Cristina Menghini, Luigi Sisea, Cristian R. Sokovic, Marina Zengin, Gokhan Păltinean, Ramona Bădărău, Sabin C. Vodnar, Dan Crișan, Gianina Antioxidants (Basel) Article Even though Salvia genus is one of the most known and studied taxa of Lamiaceae family, the knowledge regarding the chemical composition and health-related benefits of some locally used Salvia species (mostly endemic) is still scarce. In this regard, the present work aims to evaluate the chemical profile and potential bioactivities of 70% (v/v) ethanolic extracts obtained from the less-studied S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa in comparison with S. officinalis. HPLC-PDA analysis revealed the presence of rutin and catechin as the main compounds in the extracts of the three studied species (using the employed HPLC method), whereas the presence of naringenin was highlighted only in S. glutinosa extract. Chlorogenic acid, rutin and quercetin were identified and quantified for the first time in S. transsylvanica extracts. The in vitro antioxidant capacity of each extract was tested through complementary methods (phosphomolybdenum assay, DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC and FRAP assays), and correlated with the presence of phenolics (especially flavonoids) in high amounts. The neuroprotective and antidiabetic abilities of S. officinalis (the most active as AChE, BChE and α-glucosidase inhibitor), S. glutinosa (the most active as α-amylase inhibitor) and S. transsylvanica were also studied. For each extract it was determined the antimicrobial, antifungal and cytotoxic effects using in vitro assays. The obtained results confirm the potential of S. transsylvanica and S. glutinosa as promising sources of bioactive compounds and as a starting point for further analyses. MDPI 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7346212/ /pubmed/32498441 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Mocan, Andrei
Babotă, Mihai
Pop, Anca
Fizeșan, Ionel
Diuzheva, Alina
Locatelli, Marcello
Carradori, Simone
Campestre, Cristina
Menghini, Luigi
Sisea, Cristian R.
Sokovic, Marina
Zengin, Gokhan
Păltinean, Ramona
Bădărău, Sabin
C. Vodnar, Dan
Crișan, Gianina
Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title_full Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title_fullStr Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title_full_unstemmed Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title_short Chemical Constituents and Biologic Activities of Sage Species: A Comparison between Salvia officinalis L., S. glutinosa L. and S. transsylvanica (Schur ex Griseb. & Schenk) Schur
title_sort chemical constituents and biologic activities of sage species: a comparison between salvia officinalis l., s. glutinosa l. and s. transsylvanica (schur ex griseb. & schenk) schur
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7346212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32498441
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox9060480
work_keys_str_mv AT mocanandrei chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT babotamihai chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT popanca chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT fizesanionel chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT diuzhevaalina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT locatellimarcello chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT carradorisimone chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT campestrecristina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT menghiniluigi chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT siseacristianr chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT sokovicmarina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT zengingokhan chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT paltineanramona chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT badarausabin chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT cvodnardan chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur
AT crisangianina chemicalconstituentsandbiologicactivitiesofsagespeciesacomparisonbetweensalviaofficinalislsglutinosalandstranssylvanicaschurexgrisebschenkschur