Cargando…

Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality

We aimed to assess the effect of a high-quality diet on the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and to evaluate the overall quality of our findings by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the references of related articles to February 2020. Two reviewers independently retrieved...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moazzen, Sara, van der Sloot, Kimberley W. J., Vonk, Roel J., de Bock, Geertruida H., Alizadeh, Behrooz Z.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061863
_version_ 1783557827686563840
author Moazzen, Sara
van der Sloot, Kimberley W. J.
Vonk, Roel J.
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Alizadeh, Behrooz Z.
author_facet Moazzen, Sara
van der Sloot, Kimberley W. J.
Vonk, Roel J.
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Alizadeh, Behrooz Z.
author_sort Moazzen, Sara
collection PubMed
description We aimed to assess the effect of a high-quality diet on the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and to evaluate the overall quality of our findings by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the references of related articles to February 2020. Two reviewers independently retrieved the data and performed the quality assessments. We defined the highest-quality diet as that with the lowest Diet Inflammatory Index category and the highest Mediterranean Diet Score category. Overall odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for upper gastrointestinal cancer risk comparing the highest- versus lowest-diet quality. A random-effects meta-analysis was then applied with Review Manager, and the quality of the overall findings was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The highest-quality diets were significantly associated with reduced risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers, achieving odds ratios of 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.72) for the Diet Inflammatory Index, pooling the findings from nine studies, and 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.88) for the Mediterranean Diet Score, pooling the findings from 11 studies. We observed a minimum of 69% heterogeneity in the pooled results. The pooled results were graded as low quality of evidence. Although it may be possible to offer evidence-based general dietary advice for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal cancers, the evidence is currently of insufficient quality to develop dietary recommendations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7353231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73532312020-07-15 Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality Moazzen, Sara van der Sloot, Kimberley W. J. Vonk, Roel J. de Bock, Geertruida H. Alizadeh, Behrooz Z. Nutrients Review We aimed to assess the effect of a high-quality diet on the risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and to evaluate the overall quality of our findings by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and the references of related articles to February 2020. Two reviewers independently retrieved the data and performed the quality assessments. We defined the highest-quality diet as that with the lowest Diet Inflammatory Index category and the highest Mediterranean Diet Score category. Overall odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for upper gastrointestinal cancer risk comparing the highest- versus lowest-diet quality. A random-effects meta-analysis was then applied with Review Manager, and the quality of the overall findings was evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. The highest-quality diets were significantly associated with reduced risk of upper gastrointestinal cancers, achieving odds ratios of 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.48–0.72) for the Diet Inflammatory Index, pooling the findings from nine studies, and 0.72 (95% confidence interval: 0.61–0.88) for the Mediterranean Diet Score, pooling the findings from 11 studies. We observed a minimum of 69% heterogeneity in the pooled results. The pooled results were graded as low quality of evidence. Although it may be possible to offer evidence-based general dietary advice for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal cancers, the evidence is currently of insufficient quality to develop dietary recommendations. MDPI 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7353231/ /pubmed/32585822 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061863 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Moazzen, Sara
van der Sloot, Kimberley W. J.
Vonk, Roel J.
de Bock, Geertruida H.
Alizadeh, Behrooz Z.
Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title_full Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title_fullStr Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title_full_unstemmed Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title_short Diet Quality and Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Risk: A Meta-Analysis and Critical Assessment of Evidence Quality
title_sort diet quality and upper gastrointestinal cancers risk: a meta-analysis and critical assessment of evidence quality
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585822
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061863
work_keys_str_mv AT moazzensara dietqualityanduppergastrointestinalcancersriskametaanalysisandcriticalassessmentofevidencequality
AT vanderslootkimberleywj dietqualityanduppergastrointestinalcancersriskametaanalysisandcriticalassessmentofevidencequality
AT vonkroelj dietqualityanduppergastrointestinalcancersriskametaanalysisandcriticalassessmentofevidencequality
AT debockgeertruidah dietqualityanduppergastrointestinalcancersriskametaanalysisandcriticalassessmentofevidencequality
AT alizadehbehroozz dietqualityanduppergastrointestinalcancersriskametaanalysisandcriticalassessmentofevidencequality