Cargando…

Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery

To assess the difference in the fate of the antibiotic colistin (COLI) after its pulmonary delivery as a powder or a solution, we developed a COLI powder and evaluated the COLI pharmacokinetic properties in rats after pulmonary administration of the powder or the solution. The amorphous COLI powder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tewes, Frédéric, Brillault, Julien, Gregoire, Nicolas, Olivier, Jean-Christophe, Lamarche, Isabelle, Adier, Christophe, Healy, Anne-Marie, Marchand, Sandrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060557
_version_ 1783558597880315904
author Tewes, Frédéric
Brillault, Julien
Gregoire, Nicolas
Olivier, Jean-Christophe
Lamarche, Isabelle
Adier, Christophe
Healy, Anne-Marie
Marchand, Sandrine
author_facet Tewes, Frédéric
Brillault, Julien
Gregoire, Nicolas
Olivier, Jean-Christophe
Lamarche, Isabelle
Adier, Christophe
Healy, Anne-Marie
Marchand, Sandrine
author_sort Tewes, Frédéric
collection PubMed
description To assess the difference in the fate of the antibiotic colistin (COLI) after its pulmonary delivery as a powder or a solution, we developed a COLI powder and evaluated the COLI pharmacokinetic properties in rats after pulmonary administration of the powder or the solution. The amorphous COLI powder prepared by spray drying was characterized by a mass median aerodynamic diameter and fine particle fraction of 2.68 ± 0.07 µm and 59.5 ± 5.4%, respectively, when emitted from a Handihaler(®). After intratracheal administration, the average pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF): plasma area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) ratios were 570 and 95 for the COLI solution and powder, respectively. However, the same COLI plasma concentration profiles were obtained with the two formulations. According to our pharmacokinetic model, this difference in ELF COLI concentration could be due to faster systemic absorption of COLI after the powder inhalation than for the solution. In addition, the COLI apparent permeability (P(app)) across a Calu-3 epithelium model increased 10-fold when its concentration changed from 100 to 4000 mg/L. Based on this last result, we propose that the difference observed in vivo between the COLI solution and powder could be due to a high local ELF COLI concentration being obtained at the site where the dry particles impact the lung. This high local COLI concentration can lead to a local increase in COLI P(app), which is associated with a high concentration gradient and could produce a high local transfer of COLI across the epithelium and a consequent increase in the overall absorption rate of COLI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7356940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73569402020-07-22 Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery Tewes, Frédéric Brillault, Julien Gregoire, Nicolas Olivier, Jean-Christophe Lamarche, Isabelle Adier, Christophe Healy, Anne-Marie Marchand, Sandrine Pharmaceutics Article To assess the difference in the fate of the antibiotic colistin (COLI) after its pulmonary delivery as a powder or a solution, we developed a COLI powder and evaluated the COLI pharmacokinetic properties in rats after pulmonary administration of the powder or the solution. The amorphous COLI powder prepared by spray drying was characterized by a mass median aerodynamic diameter and fine particle fraction of 2.68 ± 0.07 µm and 59.5 ± 5.4%, respectively, when emitted from a Handihaler(®). After intratracheal administration, the average pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF): plasma area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) ratios were 570 and 95 for the COLI solution and powder, respectively. However, the same COLI plasma concentration profiles were obtained with the two formulations. According to our pharmacokinetic model, this difference in ELF COLI concentration could be due to faster systemic absorption of COLI after the powder inhalation than for the solution. In addition, the COLI apparent permeability (P(app)) across a Calu-3 epithelium model increased 10-fold when its concentration changed from 100 to 4000 mg/L. Based on this last result, we propose that the difference observed in vivo between the COLI solution and powder could be due to a high local ELF COLI concentration being obtained at the site where the dry particles impact the lung. This high local COLI concentration can lead to a local increase in COLI P(app), which is associated with a high concentration gradient and could produce a high local transfer of COLI across the epithelium and a consequent increase in the overall absorption rate of COLI. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7356940/ /pubmed/32560289 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060557 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tewes, Frédéric
Brillault, Julien
Gregoire, Nicolas
Olivier, Jean-Christophe
Lamarche, Isabelle
Adier, Christophe
Healy, Anne-Marie
Marchand, Sandrine
Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title_full Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title_fullStr Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title_short Comparison between Colistin Sulfate Dry Powder and Solution for Pulmonary Delivery
title_sort comparison between colistin sulfate dry powder and solution for pulmonary delivery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560289
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060557
work_keys_str_mv AT tewesfrederic comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT brillaultjulien comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT gregoirenicolas comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT olivierjeanchristophe comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT lamarcheisabelle comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT adierchristophe comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT healyannemarie comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery
AT marchandsandrine comparisonbetweencolistinsulfatedrypowderandsolutionforpulmonarydelivery