Cargando…
A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance
This study examined the effects of different nap durations on attention and physical performance as well as mood states, sleepiness, perceived exertion (RPE), recovery (PRS), and muscle soreness (DOMS) in trained men. Fourteen amateur team sport players (age: 20.3 ± 3.0 years, height: 173.1 ± 6.7 cm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134650 |
_version_ | 1783560838489047040 |
---|---|
author | Boukhris, Omar Trabelsi, Khaled Ammar, Achraf Abdessalem, Raouf Hsouna, Hsen Glenn, Jordan M. Bott, Nick Driss, Tarak Souissi, Nizar Hammouda, Omar Garbarino, Sergio Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Chtourou, Hamdi |
author_facet | Boukhris, Omar Trabelsi, Khaled Ammar, Achraf Abdessalem, Raouf Hsouna, Hsen Glenn, Jordan M. Bott, Nick Driss, Tarak Souissi, Nizar Hammouda, Omar Garbarino, Sergio Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Chtourou, Hamdi |
author_sort | Boukhris, Omar |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined the effects of different nap durations on attention and physical performance as well as mood states, sleepiness, perceived exertion (RPE), recovery (PRS), and muscle soreness (DOMS) in trained men. Fourteen amateur team sport players (age: 20.3 ± 3.0 years, height: 173.1 ± 6.7 cm, body-mass: 68.1 ± 6.6 kg) performed a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) test, 5-m shuttle run, and the digit-cancellation (i.e., attention) test after a no-nap (N0) and 40-min (N40) and 90-min (N90) of nap opportunities. Subjective measurement of mood states, RPE, PRS and DOMS were determined. Compared to N0, both nap durations enhanced attention, MVIC, total distance (TD), and higher distance (HD) (p < 0.001), with a higher gain after N90 compared to N40 for attention (Δ = +3), MVIC (Δ = +30 N) and TD (Δ = +35 m) (p < 0.001). Total mood scores were better after N40 and N90 compared to N0 (p < 0.05), with lower scores after N90 compared to N40 (p < 0.05). DOMS and RPE scores were significantly lower and PRS was significantly higher after N40 and N90 compared to N0 and after N90 compared to N40 (p < 0.05). Although both nap opportunity durations were beneficial, N90 was better than N40 for improving physical performances and attention as well as the perception of recovery, reducing fatigue perception, muscle soreness, and negative mood states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7369743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73697432020-07-21 A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance Boukhris, Omar Trabelsi, Khaled Ammar, Achraf Abdessalem, Raouf Hsouna, Hsen Glenn, Jordan M. Bott, Nick Driss, Tarak Souissi, Nizar Hammouda, Omar Garbarino, Sergio Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Chtourou, Hamdi Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This study examined the effects of different nap durations on attention and physical performance as well as mood states, sleepiness, perceived exertion (RPE), recovery (PRS), and muscle soreness (DOMS) in trained men. Fourteen amateur team sport players (age: 20.3 ± 3.0 years, height: 173.1 ± 6.7 cm, body-mass: 68.1 ± 6.6 kg) performed a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) test, 5-m shuttle run, and the digit-cancellation (i.e., attention) test after a no-nap (N0) and 40-min (N40) and 90-min (N90) of nap opportunities. Subjective measurement of mood states, RPE, PRS and DOMS were determined. Compared to N0, both nap durations enhanced attention, MVIC, total distance (TD), and higher distance (HD) (p < 0.001), with a higher gain after N90 compared to N40 for attention (Δ = +3), MVIC (Δ = +30 N) and TD (Δ = +35 m) (p < 0.001). Total mood scores were better after N40 and N90 compared to N0 (p < 0.05), with lower scores after N90 compared to N40 (p < 0.05). DOMS and RPE scores were significantly lower and PRS was significantly higher after N40 and N90 compared to N0 and after N90 compared to N40 (p < 0.05). Although both nap opportunity durations were beneficial, N90 was better than N40 for improving physical performances and attention as well as the perception of recovery, reducing fatigue perception, muscle soreness, and negative mood states. MDPI 2020-06-28 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7369743/ /pubmed/32605240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134650 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boukhris, Omar Trabelsi, Khaled Ammar, Achraf Abdessalem, Raouf Hsouna, Hsen Glenn, Jordan M. Bott, Nick Driss, Tarak Souissi, Nizar Hammouda, Omar Garbarino, Sergio Bragazzi, Nicola Luigi Chtourou, Hamdi A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title | A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title_full | A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title_fullStr | A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title_short | A 90 min Daytime Nap Opportunity Is Better Than 40 min for Cognitive and Physical Performance |
title_sort | 90 min daytime nap opportunity is better than 40 min for cognitive and physical performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7369743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32605240 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boukhrisomar a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT trabelsikhaled a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT ammarachraf a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT abdessalemraouf a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT hsounahsen a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT glennjordanm a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT bottnick a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT drisstarak a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT souissinizar a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT hammoudaomar a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT garbarinosergio a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT bragazzinicolaluigi a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT chtourouhamdi a90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT boukhrisomar 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT trabelsikhaled 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT ammarachraf 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT abdessalemraouf 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT hsounahsen 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT glennjordanm 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT bottnick 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT drisstarak 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT souissinizar 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT hammoudaomar 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT garbarinosergio 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT bragazzinicolaluigi 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance AT chtourouhamdi 90mindaytimenapopportunityisbetterthan40minforcognitiveandphysicalperformance |