Cargando…

The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability

THEORY: Young children have an understanding of basic science concepts such as stability, yet their theoretical assumptions are often not concerned with stability. The literature on theory theory and theory-evidence coordination suggests that children construct intuitive theories about their environ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weber, Anke Maria, Reuter, Timo, Leuchter, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737
_version_ 1783561420440338432
author Weber, Anke Maria
Reuter, Timo
Leuchter, Miriam
author_facet Weber, Anke Maria
Reuter, Timo
Leuchter, Miriam
author_sort Weber, Anke Maria
collection PubMed
description THEORY: Young children have an understanding of basic science concepts such as stability, yet their theoretical assumptions are often not concerned with stability. The literature on theory theory and theory-evidence coordination suggests that children construct intuitive theories about their environment which can be adjusted in the face of counterevidence that cannot be assimilated into the prior theory. With increasing age, children acquire a Center theory when balancing objects and try to balance every object at their middle, succeeding with symmetrical objects. Later, they acquire the basic science concept of stability through learning that the weight distribution of an object is of importance. Thus, they acquire a Mass theory and succeed in balancing asymmetrical objects as well. Fluid and crystallized intelligence might contribute to children’s acquisition of Mass theory. Moreover, their Mass theory might be supported by implementing a playful intervention including (a) material scaffolds and (b) verbal scaffolds. AIMS: We investigated which theories children have about stability and whether these theories can be adjusted to Mass theory by implementing a playful intervention. METHOD: A total of 183 5- to 6-year-old children took part in the study with a pre-post-follow-up intervention design. Children’s Mass theory was assessed with an interview in which children explained constructions’ stabilities. The children received a playful intervention with two differing degrees of scaffolding (material scaffolds or material + verbal scaffolds) or no scaffolding. RESULTS: At first few children used a Mass theory to explain their reasoning. However, after being confronted with counterevidence for the asymmetrical constructions, children changed their explanation and applied a Mass theory. More children in the play group with the highest degree of scaffolding, i.e., material + verbal scaffolds, acquired a Mass theory compared to the other groups. Fluid as well as crystallized intelligence contributed to children’s acquisition of a Mass theory. DISCUSSION: Counterevidence can support children in their acquisition of a Mass theory. A playful intervention with scaffolding supports children even more.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7372995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73729952020-08-04 The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability Weber, Anke Maria Reuter, Timo Leuchter, Miriam Front Psychol Psychology THEORY: Young children have an understanding of basic science concepts such as stability, yet their theoretical assumptions are often not concerned with stability. The literature on theory theory and theory-evidence coordination suggests that children construct intuitive theories about their environment which can be adjusted in the face of counterevidence that cannot be assimilated into the prior theory. With increasing age, children acquire a Center theory when balancing objects and try to balance every object at their middle, succeeding with symmetrical objects. Later, they acquire the basic science concept of stability through learning that the weight distribution of an object is of importance. Thus, they acquire a Mass theory and succeed in balancing asymmetrical objects as well. Fluid and crystallized intelligence might contribute to children’s acquisition of Mass theory. Moreover, their Mass theory might be supported by implementing a playful intervention including (a) material scaffolds and (b) verbal scaffolds. AIMS: We investigated which theories children have about stability and whether these theories can be adjusted to Mass theory by implementing a playful intervention. METHOD: A total of 183 5- to 6-year-old children took part in the study with a pre-post-follow-up intervention design. Children’s Mass theory was assessed with an interview in which children explained constructions’ stabilities. The children received a playful intervention with two differing degrees of scaffolding (material scaffolds or material + verbal scaffolds) or no scaffolding. RESULTS: At first few children used a Mass theory to explain their reasoning. However, after being confronted with counterevidence for the asymmetrical constructions, children changed their explanation and applied a Mass theory. More children in the play group with the highest degree of scaffolding, i.e., material + verbal scaffolds, acquired a Mass theory compared to the other groups. Fluid as well as crystallized intelligence contributed to children’s acquisition of a Mass theory. DISCUSSION: Counterevidence can support children in their acquisition of a Mass theory. A playful intervention with scaffolding supports children even more. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7372995/ /pubmed/32760333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737 Text en Copyright © 2020 Weber, Reuter and Leuchter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Weber, Anke Maria
Reuter, Timo
Leuchter, Miriam
The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title_full The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title_fullStr The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title_short The Impact of a Construction Play on 5- to 6-Year-Old Children’s Reasoning About Stability
title_sort impact of a construction play on 5- to 6-year-old children’s reasoning about stability
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7372995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32760333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01737
work_keys_str_mv AT weberankemaria theimpactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability
AT reutertimo theimpactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability
AT leuchtermiriam theimpactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability
AT weberankemaria impactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability
AT reutertimo impactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability
AT leuchtermiriam impactofaconstructionplayon5to6yearoldchildrensreasoningaboutstability