Cargando…

How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study

THEORY: The perceived value of study material may have implications on learning and long-term retention. This study compares the perceived value of basic science of medical students from schools with a traditional “2+2” curriculum and the USMLE Step 1 placed before core clerkships to those from medi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elfanagely, Yousef, Tanzer, Joshua Ray, Pulido, Ricardo, Rashid, Hanin, Copeland, Liesel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236365
_version_ 1783561901604601856
author Elfanagely, Yousef
Tanzer, Joshua Ray
Pulido, Ricardo
Rashid, Hanin
Copeland, Liesel
author_facet Elfanagely, Yousef
Tanzer, Joshua Ray
Pulido, Ricardo
Rashid, Hanin
Copeland, Liesel
author_sort Elfanagely, Yousef
collection PubMed
description THEORY: The perceived value of study material may have implications on learning and long-term retention. This study compares the perceived value of basic science of medical students from schools with a traditional “2+2” curriculum and the USMLE Step 1 placed before core clerkships to those from medical schools that have undergone curricular revisions, resulting in shortened pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that differences in curricula, particularly duration of pre-clerkship curriculum and timing of the USMLE Step 1, affect medical students’ perceived value of basic science. METHODS: A twenty item anonymous questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale was developed to assess medical students’ perceptions of basic science. The questionnaire was distributed to third-year medical students across four medical schools. Generalized linear models and p-values were calculated comparing the perceived value and use of basic science between medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 before clerkships and 2-years of basic science (BC) and medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships and 1.5-years of basic science (AC). RESULTS: The questionnaire was distributed to 695 eligible students and completed by 287 students. Students at BC schools tended to view basic science as more essential for clinical practice than students at AC schools across both outcomes (rating independence of basic science and clinical practice, AC school mean = 2.97, BC school mean = 2.73, p = 0.0017; rating importance of basic science to clinical practice, AC school mean = 3.30, BC schools mean = 3.50, p = 0.0135). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that students who have a longer basic science curriculum tend to value basic science greater than students with a shorter basic science curriculum. The timing of the USMLE Step 1 may also influence this relationship. Curricular decisions, such as reductions in pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after clerkships, may impact medical students’ perceptions of the value of basic science to clinical practice. This can have implications on their future engagement with basic science and should be considered when modifying curriculum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7375606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73756062020-08-04 How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study Elfanagely, Yousef Tanzer, Joshua Ray Pulido, Ricardo Rashid, Hanin Copeland, Liesel PLoS One Research Article THEORY: The perceived value of study material may have implications on learning and long-term retention. This study compares the perceived value of basic science of medical students from schools with a traditional “2+2” curriculum and the USMLE Step 1 placed before core clerkships to those from medical schools that have undergone curricular revisions, resulting in shortened pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that differences in curricula, particularly duration of pre-clerkship curriculum and timing of the USMLE Step 1, affect medical students’ perceived value of basic science. METHODS: A twenty item anonymous questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale was developed to assess medical students’ perceptions of basic science. The questionnaire was distributed to third-year medical students across four medical schools. Generalized linear models and p-values were calculated comparing the perceived value and use of basic science between medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 before clerkships and 2-years of basic science (BC) and medical schools with the USMLE Step 1 after core clerkships and 1.5-years of basic science (AC). RESULTS: The questionnaire was distributed to 695 eligible students and completed by 287 students. Students at BC schools tended to view basic science as more essential for clinical practice than students at AC schools across both outcomes (rating independence of basic science and clinical practice, AC school mean = 2.97, BC school mean = 2.73, p = 0.0017; rating importance of basic science to clinical practice, AC school mean = 3.30, BC schools mean = 3.50, p = 0.0135). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that students who have a longer basic science curriculum tend to value basic science greater than students with a shorter basic science curriculum. The timing of the USMLE Step 1 may also influence this relationship. Curricular decisions, such as reductions in pre-clerkship curricula and administration of the USMLE Step 1 after clerkships, may impact medical students’ perceptions of the value of basic science to clinical practice. This can have implications on their future engagement with basic science and should be considered when modifying curriculum. Public Library of Science 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7375606/ /pubmed/32697806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236365 Text en © 2020 Elfanagely et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Elfanagely, Yousef
Tanzer, Joshua Ray
Pulido, Ricardo
Rashid, Hanin
Copeland, Liesel
How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title_full How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title_fullStr How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title_short How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study
title_sort how curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7375606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32697806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236365
work_keys_str_mv AT elfanagelyyousef howcurricularchangesinfluencemedicalstudentsperceptionsofbasicscienceapilotstudy
AT tanzerjoshuaray howcurricularchangesinfluencemedicalstudentsperceptionsofbasicscienceapilotstudy
AT pulidoricardo howcurricularchangesinfluencemedicalstudentsperceptionsofbasicscienceapilotstudy
AT rashidhanin howcurricularchangesinfluencemedicalstudentsperceptionsofbasicscienceapilotstudy
AT copelandliesel howcurricularchangesinfluencemedicalstudentsperceptionsofbasicscienceapilotstudy