Cargando…

A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise

The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krzysztofik, Michal, Golas, Artur, Wilk, Michal, Stastny, Petr, Lockie, Robert George, Zajac, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875
_version_ 1783562503091912704
author Krzysztofik, Michal
Golas, Artur
Wilk, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Lockie, Robert George
Zajac, Adam
author_facet Krzysztofik, Michal
Golas, Artur
Wilk, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Lockie, Robert George
Zajac, Adam
author_sort Krzysztofik, Michal
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded for the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and the lateral and long heads of the triceps brachii during each attempt. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated statistically significant main interaction for bar × load × muscle (p < 0.01); bar × load (p < 0.01); bar × muscle (p < 0.01); load × muscle (p < 0.01). There was also a main effect for the bar (p < 0.01); load (p < 0.01); and muscle group (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for the main multiple interaction effect of bar × load × muscle showed a statistically significant increase in sEMG for the standard bar in the pectoralis major compared to the cambered bar at 50% 1RM (p < 0.01) and 90% 1RM (p < 0.01), as well as in the triceps brachii long at 90% 1RM (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in sEMG was registered for the standard bar in the anterior deltoid compared to the cambered bar at 90% 1RM (p = 0.02). The results indicated that the cambered bar was superior in activating the anterior deltoid muscle compared to the standard bar during the BP exercise, whereas the standard bar provided higher pectoralis major and triceps brachii long head sEMG activity at 90% 1RM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7378805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73788052020-08-05 A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise Krzysztofik, Michal Golas, Artur Wilk, Michal Stastny, Petr Lockie, Robert George Zajac, Adam Front Physiol Physiology The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded for the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and the lateral and long heads of the triceps brachii during each attempt. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated statistically significant main interaction for bar × load × muscle (p < 0.01); bar × load (p < 0.01); bar × muscle (p < 0.01); load × muscle (p < 0.01). There was also a main effect for the bar (p < 0.01); load (p < 0.01); and muscle group (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for the main multiple interaction effect of bar × load × muscle showed a statistically significant increase in sEMG for the standard bar in the pectoralis major compared to the cambered bar at 50% 1RM (p < 0.01) and 90% 1RM (p < 0.01), as well as in the triceps brachii long at 90% 1RM (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in sEMG was registered for the standard bar in the anterior deltoid compared to the cambered bar at 90% 1RM (p = 0.02). The results indicated that the cambered bar was superior in activating the anterior deltoid muscle compared to the standard bar during the BP exercise, whereas the standard bar provided higher pectoralis major and triceps brachii long head sEMG activity at 90% 1RM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7378805/ /pubmed/32765305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875 Text en Copyright © 2020 Krzysztofik, Golas, Wilk, Stastny, Lockie and Zajac. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Krzysztofik, Michal
Golas, Artur
Wilk, Michal
Stastny, Petr
Lockie, Robert George
Zajac, Adam
A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title_full A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title_fullStr A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title_short A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
title_sort comparison of muscle activity between the cambered and standard bar during the bench press exercise
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875
work_keys_str_mv AT krzysztofikmichal acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT golasartur acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT wilkmichal acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT stastnypetr acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT lockierobertgeorge acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT zajacadam acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT krzysztofikmichal comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT golasartur comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT wilkmichal comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT stastnypetr comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT lockierobertgeorge comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise
AT zajacadam comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise