Cargando…
A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise
The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875 |
_version_ | 1783562503091912704 |
---|---|
author | Krzysztofik, Michal Golas, Artur Wilk, Michal Stastny, Petr Lockie, Robert George Zajac, Adam |
author_facet | Krzysztofik, Michal Golas, Artur Wilk, Michal Stastny, Petr Lockie, Robert George Zajac, Adam |
author_sort | Krzysztofik, Michal |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded for the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and the lateral and long heads of the triceps brachii during each attempt. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated statistically significant main interaction for bar × load × muscle (p < 0.01); bar × load (p < 0.01); bar × muscle (p < 0.01); load × muscle (p < 0.01). There was also a main effect for the bar (p < 0.01); load (p < 0.01); and muscle group (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for the main multiple interaction effect of bar × load × muscle showed a statistically significant increase in sEMG for the standard bar in the pectoralis major compared to the cambered bar at 50% 1RM (p < 0.01) and 90% 1RM (p < 0.01), as well as in the triceps brachii long at 90% 1RM (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in sEMG was registered for the standard bar in the anterior deltoid compared to the cambered bar at 90% 1RM (p = 0.02). The results indicated that the cambered bar was superior in activating the anterior deltoid muscle compared to the standard bar during the BP exercise, whereas the standard bar provided higher pectoralis major and triceps brachii long head sEMG activity at 90% 1RM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7378805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73788052020-08-05 A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise Krzysztofik, Michal Golas, Artur Wilk, Michal Stastny, Petr Lockie, Robert George Zajac, Adam Front Physiol Physiology The aim of this study was to compare the electromyographic activity between the standard and cambered bar during the bench press (BP) exercise. Twelve resistance-trained males performed the flat BP with a standard and a cambered bar at selected loads (50%, 70%, and 90% 1RM). Muscle activation assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) was recorded for the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, and the lateral and long heads of the triceps brachii during each attempt. A three-way repeated measures ANOVA indicated statistically significant main interaction for bar × load × muscle (p < 0.01); bar × load (p < 0.01); bar × muscle (p < 0.01); load × muscle (p < 0.01). There was also a main effect for the bar (p < 0.01); load (p < 0.01); and muscle group (p < 0.01). The post hoc analysis for the main multiple interaction effect of bar × load × muscle showed a statistically significant increase in sEMG for the standard bar in the pectoralis major compared to the cambered bar at 50% 1RM (p < 0.01) and 90% 1RM (p < 0.01), as well as in the triceps brachii long at 90% 1RM (p < 0.01). Furthermore, a statistically significant decrease in sEMG was registered for the standard bar in the anterior deltoid compared to the cambered bar at 90% 1RM (p = 0.02). The results indicated that the cambered bar was superior in activating the anterior deltoid muscle compared to the standard bar during the BP exercise, whereas the standard bar provided higher pectoralis major and triceps brachii long head sEMG activity at 90% 1RM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7378805/ /pubmed/32765305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875 Text en Copyright © 2020 Krzysztofik, Golas, Wilk, Stastny, Lockie and Zajac. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Krzysztofik, Michal Golas, Artur Wilk, Michal Stastny, Petr Lockie, Robert George Zajac, Adam A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title | A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title_full | A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title_short | A Comparison of Muscle Activity Between the Cambered and Standard Bar During the Bench Press Exercise |
title_sort | comparison of muscle activity between the cambered and standard bar during the bench press exercise |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7378805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32765305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00875 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krzysztofikmichal acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT golasartur acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT wilkmichal acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT stastnypetr acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT lockierobertgeorge acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT zajacadam acomparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT krzysztofikmichal comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT golasartur comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT wilkmichal comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT stastnypetr comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT lockierobertgeorge comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise AT zajacadam comparisonofmuscleactivitybetweenthecamberedandstandardbarduringthebenchpressexercise |