Cargando…
Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology
Mendelian randomization (MR) in epidemiology is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) in non-experimental design to make causality of a modifiable exposure on an outcome or disease. It assesses the causal effect between risk factor and a clinical outcome. The main reason to app...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Lipidology and Atherosclerosis
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821701 http://dx.doi.org/10.12997/jla.2019.8.2.67 |
_version_ | 1783562573268910080 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kwan Lim, Chi-Yeon |
author_facet | Lee, Kwan Lim, Chi-Yeon |
author_sort | Lee, Kwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mendelian randomization (MR) in epidemiology is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) in non-experimental design to make causality of a modifiable exposure on an outcome or disease. It assesses the causal effect between risk factor and a clinical outcome. The main reason to approach MR is to avoid the problem of residual confounding. There is no association between the genotype of early pregnancy and the disease, and the genotype of an individual cannot be changed. For this reason, it results with randomly assigned case-control studies can be set by regressing the measurements. IVs in MR are used genetic variants for estimating the causality. Usually an outcome is a disease and an exposure is risk factor, intermediate phenotype which may be a biomarker. The choice of the genetic variable as IV (Z) is essential to a successful in MR analysis. MR is named ‘Mendelian deconfounding’ as it gives to estimate of the causality free from biases due to confounding (C). To estimate unbiased estimation of the causality of the exposure (X) on the clinically relevant outcome (Y), Z has the 3 core assumptions (A1-A3). A1) Z is independent of C; A2) Z is associated with X; and A3) Z is independent of Y given X and C; The purpose of this review provides an overview of the MR analysis and is to explain that using an IV is proposed as an alternative statistical method to estimate causal effect of exposure and outcome under controlling for a confounder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7379124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Lipidology and Atherosclerosis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73791242020-08-18 Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology Lee, Kwan Lim, Chi-Yeon J Lipid Atheroscler News & Views Mendelian randomization (MR) in epidemiology is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) in non-experimental design to make causality of a modifiable exposure on an outcome or disease. It assesses the causal effect between risk factor and a clinical outcome. The main reason to approach MR is to avoid the problem of residual confounding. There is no association between the genotype of early pregnancy and the disease, and the genotype of an individual cannot be changed. For this reason, it results with randomly assigned case-control studies can be set by regressing the measurements. IVs in MR are used genetic variants for estimating the causality. Usually an outcome is a disease and an exposure is risk factor, intermediate phenotype which may be a biomarker. The choice of the genetic variable as IV (Z) is essential to a successful in MR analysis. MR is named ‘Mendelian deconfounding’ as it gives to estimate of the causality free from biases due to confounding (C). To estimate unbiased estimation of the causality of the exposure (X) on the clinically relevant outcome (Y), Z has the 3 core assumptions (A1-A3). A1) Z is independent of C; A2) Z is associated with X; and A3) Z is independent of Y given X and C; The purpose of this review provides an overview of the MR analysis and is to explain that using an IV is proposed as an alternative statistical method to estimate causal effect of exposure and outcome under controlling for a confounder. Korean Society of Lipidology and Atherosclerosis 2019-09 2019-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7379124/ /pubmed/32821701 http://dx.doi.org/10.12997/jla.2019.8.2.67 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Korean Society of Lipid and Atherosclerosis. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | News & Views Lee, Kwan Lim, Chi-Yeon Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title | Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title_full | Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title_fullStr | Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title_full_unstemmed | Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title_short | Mendelian Randomization Analysis in Observational Epidemiology |
title_sort | mendelian randomization analysis in observational epidemiology |
topic | News & Views |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821701 http://dx.doi.org/10.12997/jla.2019.8.2.67 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekwan mendelianrandomizationanalysisinobservationalepidemiology AT limchiyeon mendelianrandomizationanalysisinobservationalepidemiology |