Cargando…

Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream

Direct comparisons between skin absorption data and clinical pharmacokinetic data are rare. Here we use the lipophilic nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist BAY1003803 to make such a comparison. The objective is to find the extent to which measurements of skin permeation in vitro ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Günther, Clemens, Kowal, Kristin, Schmidt, Timm, Jambrecina, Alen, Toner, Frank, Nave, Rüdiger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.736
_version_ 1783563530306322432
author Günther, Clemens
Kowal, Kristin
Schmidt, Timm
Jambrecina, Alen
Toner, Frank
Nave, Rüdiger
author_facet Günther, Clemens
Kowal, Kristin
Schmidt, Timm
Jambrecina, Alen
Toner, Frank
Nave, Rüdiger
author_sort Günther, Clemens
collection PubMed
description Direct comparisons between skin absorption data and clinical pharmacokinetic data are rare. Here we use the lipophilic nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist BAY1003803 to make such a comparison. The objective is to find the extent to which measurements of skin permeation in vitro can be used to predict the corresponding permeation in vivo for human pharmacokinetics of topically applied substances. BAY1003803 was prepared in various formulations: ointment, hydrophilic cream, lipophilic cream, and milk. Its ability to permeate healthy human skin was measured in vitro in static diffusion cells, and percutaneous absorption as well as dermal delivery was measured thereafter, for 2 selected formulations, in vivo in healthy volunteers. Absorption in vivo comparing ointment and lipophilic cream was correlated with expectation based on the dermal delivery obtained in vitro. A 2.17‐fold higher systemic exposure to BAY1003803 was achieved by the ointment formulation. This is well in line with the predicted exposure difference of 2.74 based on the in vitro data. In conclusion, in vitro skin absorption studies using human skin are suitable for the prediction of systemic exposure and formulation effects in vivo; they can therefore be applied to guide the design of clinical investigations of dermatological preparations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7383986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73839862020-07-28 Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream Günther, Clemens Kowal, Kristin Schmidt, Timm Jambrecina, Alen Toner, Frank Nave, Rüdiger Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Articles Direct comparisons between skin absorption data and clinical pharmacokinetic data are rare. Here we use the lipophilic nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist BAY1003803 to make such a comparison. The objective is to find the extent to which measurements of skin permeation in vitro can be used to predict the corresponding permeation in vivo for human pharmacokinetics of topically applied substances. BAY1003803 was prepared in various formulations: ointment, hydrophilic cream, lipophilic cream, and milk. Its ability to permeate healthy human skin was measured in vitro in static diffusion cells, and percutaneous absorption as well as dermal delivery was measured thereafter, for 2 selected formulations, in vivo in healthy volunteers. Absorption in vivo comparing ointment and lipophilic cream was correlated with expectation based on the dermal delivery obtained in vitro. A 2.17‐fold higher systemic exposure to BAY1003803 was achieved by the ointment formulation. This is well in line with the predicted exposure difference of 2.74 based on the in vitro data. In conclusion, in vitro skin absorption studies using human skin are suitable for the prediction of systemic exposure and formulation effects in vivo; they can therefore be applied to guide the design of clinical investigations of dermatological preparations. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-24 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7383986/ /pubmed/31647607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.736 Text en © 2019 Bayer AG. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Günther, Clemens
Kowal, Kristin
Schmidt, Timm
Jambrecina, Alen
Toner, Frank
Nave, Rüdiger
Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title_full Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title_fullStr Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title_short Comparison of In Vitro and In Vivo Percutaneous Absorption Across Human Skin Using BAY1003803 Formulated as Ointment and Cream
title_sort comparison of in vitro and in vivo percutaneous absorption across human skin using bay1003803 formulated as ointment and cream
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7383986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31647607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.736
work_keys_str_mv AT guntherclemens comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream
AT kowalkristin comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream
AT schmidttimm comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream
AT jambrecinaalen comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream
AT tonerfrank comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream
AT naverudiger comparisonofinvitroandinvivopercutaneousabsorptionacrosshumanskinusingbay1003803formulatedasointmentandcream