Cargando…
No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832 |
_version_ | 1783565193851174912 |
---|---|
author | Timmermeister, Mona Leseman, Paul Wijnen, Frank Blom, Elma |
author_facet | Timmermeister, Mona Leseman, Paul Wijnen, Frank Blom, Elma |
author_sort | Timmermeister, Mona |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group research of cognitive effects of bilingualism is hardly ever combined with within-group research that investigates relationships between language control and cognitive control. The present study compared 27 monolingual Dutch and 27 bilingual Turkish-Dutch children matched on age and fluid intelligence on their performance in a nonverbal switching task. Within the group of bilinguals, the relationship between nonverbal switching and language switching was examined. The results revealed no between-group differences on nonverbal switching. Within the bilingual sample, response times in the language switching and nonverbal switching tasks were related, although no relationships were found between accuracy, switching cost and mixing cost on both tasks. The results support the hypothesis that children utilize domain-general cognitive control in language switching, but this relationship does not entail that bilinguals have better cognitive control than monolinguals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7394216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73942162020-08-12 No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching Timmermeister, Mona Leseman, Paul Wijnen, Frank Blom, Elma Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group research of cognitive effects of bilingualism is hardly ever combined with within-group research that investigates relationships between language control and cognitive control. The present study compared 27 monolingual Dutch and 27 bilingual Turkish-Dutch children matched on age and fluid intelligence on their performance in a nonverbal switching task. Within the group of bilinguals, the relationship between nonverbal switching and language switching was examined. The results revealed no between-group differences on nonverbal switching. Within the bilingual sample, response times in the language switching and nonverbal switching tasks were related, although no relationships were found between accuracy, switching cost and mixing cost on both tasks. The results support the hypothesis that children utilize domain-general cognitive control in language switching, but this relationship does not entail that bilinguals have better cognitive control than monolinguals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7394216/ /pubmed/32793084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832 Text en Copyright © 2020 Timmermeister, Leseman, Wijnen and Blom. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Timmermeister, Mona Leseman, Paul Wijnen, Frank Blom, Elma No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title | No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title_full | No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title_fullStr | No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title_full_unstemmed | No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title_short | No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching |
title_sort | no bilingual benefits despite relations between language switching and task switching |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timmermeistermona nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching AT lesemanpaul nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching AT wijnenfrank nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching AT blomelma nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching |