Cargando…

No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching

Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Timmermeister, Mona, Leseman, Paul, Wijnen, Frank, Blom, Elma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832
_version_ 1783565193851174912
author Timmermeister, Mona
Leseman, Paul
Wijnen, Frank
Blom, Elma
author_facet Timmermeister, Mona
Leseman, Paul
Wijnen, Frank
Blom, Elma
author_sort Timmermeister, Mona
collection PubMed
description Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group research of cognitive effects of bilingualism is hardly ever combined with within-group research that investigates relationships between language control and cognitive control. The present study compared 27 monolingual Dutch and 27 bilingual Turkish-Dutch children matched on age and fluid intelligence on their performance in a nonverbal switching task. Within the group of bilinguals, the relationship between nonverbal switching and language switching was examined. The results revealed no between-group differences on nonverbal switching. Within the bilingual sample, response times in the language switching and nonverbal switching tasks were related, although no relationships were found between accuracy, switching cost and mixing cost on both tasks. The results support the hypothesis that children utilize domain-general cognitive control in language switching, but this relationship does not entail that bilinguals have better cognitive control than monolinguals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7394216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73942162020-08-12 No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching Timmermeister, Mona Leseman, Paul Wijnen, Frank Blom, Elma Front Psychol Psychology Previous research has shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing cognitive control. Bilinguals’ enhanced cognitive control is thought to be caused by the necessity to exert more language control in bilingual compared to monolingual settings. Surprisingly, between-group research of cognitive effects of bilingualism is hardly ever combined with within-group research that investigates relationships between language control and cognitive control. The present study compared 27 monolingual Dutch and 27 bilingual Turkish-Dutch children matched on age and fluid intelligence on their performance in a nonverbal switching task. Within the group of bilinguals, the relationship between nonverbal switching and language switching was examined. The results revealed no between-group differences on nonverbal switching. Within the bilingual sample, response times in the language switching and nonverbal switching tasks were related, although no relationships were found between accuracy, switching cost and mixing cost on both tasks. The results support the hypothesis that children utilize domain-general cognitive control in language switching, but this relationship does not entail that bilinguals have better cognitive control than monolinguals. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7394216/ /pubmed/32793084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832 Text en Copyright © 2020 Timmermeister, Leseman, Wijnen and Blom. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Timmermeister, Mona
Leseman, Paul
Wijnen, Frank
Blom, Elma
No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title_full No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title_fullStr No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title_full_unstemmed No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title_short No Bilingual Benefits Despite Relations Between Language Switching and Task Switching
title_sort no bilingual benefits despite relations between language switching and task switching
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7394216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32793084
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01832
work_keys_str_mv AT timmermeistermona nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching
AT lesemanpaul nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching
AT wijnenfrank nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching
AT blomelma nobilingualbenefitsdespiterelationsbetweenlanguageswitchingandtaskswitching