Cargando…
Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons
In order to promote the employment of persons with disabilities, two dominant legal approaches—anti-discrimination legislation based on the social model of disability and an employment quota scheme based on the medical model—are usually employed on a nation-state basis in disability policies. This a...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144976 |
_version_ | 1783566297720684544 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Yuling Li, Peng |
author_facet | Hao, Yuling Li, Peng |
author_sort | Hao, Yuling |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to promote the employment of persons with disabilities, two dominant legal approaches—anti-discrimination legislation based on the social model of disability and an employment quota scheme based on the medical model—are usually employed on a nation-state basis in disability policies. This article systematically examines the reasons why both the anti-discrimination and employment quota scheme legal frameworks have limited effectiveness in promoting employment of persons with disabilities in China. We found that the lack of a definition of disability, the lack of a definition of discrimination, and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms are the reasons for poor outcomes of the anti-discrimination legal framework. For the employment quota scheme, conflicts between the mainstream labor market legal framework and the quota scheme legal framework have prompted employers to pay penalties rather than hire persons with disabilities. China should address these issues in the current legal system in the short term. Meanwhile, the CRPD should be more strongly emphasized in China. This article argues for the human rights model espoused by the CRPD, instead of the medical model, to develop a coherent and sustainable disability legal framework for promoting participation of persons with disabilities, rather than focusing on viewing them as recipients of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7400147 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74001472020-08-23 Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons Hao, Yuling Li, Peng Int J Environ Res Public Health Article In order to promote the employment of persons with disabilities, two dominant legal approaches—anti-discrimination legislation based on the social model of disability and an employment quota scheme based on the medical model—are usually employed on a nation-state basis in disability policies. This article systematically examines the reasons why both the anti-discrimination and employment quota scheme legal frameworks have limited effectiveness in promoting employment of persons with disabilities in China. We found that the lack of a definition of disability, the lack of a definition of discrimination, and the absence of effective enforcement mechanisms are the reasons for poor outcomes of the anti-discrimination legal framework. For the employment quota scheme, conflicts between the mainstream labor market legal framework and the quota scheme legal framework have prompted employers to pay penalties rather than hire persons with disabilities. China should address these issues in the current legal system in the short term. Meanwhile, the CRPD should be more strongly emphasized in China. This article argues for the human rights model espoused by the CRPD, instead of the medical model, to develop a coherent and sustainable disability legal framework for promoting participation of persons with disabilities, rather than focusing on viewing them as recipients of care. MDPI 2020-07-10 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7400147/ /pubmed/32664283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144976 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hao, Yuling Li, Peng Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title | Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title_full | Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title_fullStr | Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title_full_unstemmed | Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title_short | Employment Legal Framework for Persons with Disabilities in China: Effectiveness and Reasons |
title_sort | employment legal framework for persons with disabilities in china: effectiveness and reasons |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7400147/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664283 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144976 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haoyuling employmentlegalframeworkforpersonswithdisabilitiesinchinaeffectivenessandreasons AT lipeng employmentlegalframeworkforpersonswithdisabilitiesinchinaeffectivenessandreasons |