Cargando…

Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the 3-item version of the Work Engagement Scale (WES-3), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and was used in the 5(th) Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). METHODS: This study used data from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Maro, Suh, Chunhui, Choi, Seong Pil, Lee, Chae Kwan, Son, Byung Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802343
http://dx.doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e27
_version_ 1783567469975175168
author Choi, Maro
Suh, Chunhui
Choi, Seong Pil
Lee, Chae Kwan
Son, Byung Chul
author_facet Choi, Maro
Suh, Chunhui
Choi, Seong Pil
Lee, Chae Kwan
Son, Byung Chul
author_sort Choi, Maro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the 3-item version of the Work Engagement Scale (WES-3), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and was used in the 5(th) Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). METHODS: This study used data from the 5th KWCS (n = 50,205), which was conducted in 2017 with a sample of the Korean working population. The survey gathered comprehensive information on working conditions to define workforce changes and the quality of work and life. The reliability and internal consistency of the WES-3 were assessed using the corrected item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of work engagement. The convergent validity was assessed using the correlation with the WHO-5 well-being index. Correlations between work engagement and JD-R factors were also calculated. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha for work engagement was 0.776, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The model comprising 3 work engagement and 2 burnout items showed an excellent fit (χ(2): 382.05, Tucker-Lewis index: 0.984, comparative fit index: 0.994, root mean square error of approximation: 0.043). The convergent validity was significant (correlation coefficient: 0.42). Correlations with burnout and job demands were negligible, whereas correlations with job resources and job satisfaction were weakly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study confirm that the WES-3 has acceptable reliability and validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7406668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74066682020-08-13 Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey Choi, Maro Suh, Chunhui Choi, Seong Pil Lee, Chae Kwan Son, Byung Chul Ann Occup Environ Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the 3-item version of the Work Engagement Scale (WES-3), which is based on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model and was used in the 5(th) Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS). METHODS: This study used data from the 5th KWCS (n = 50,205), which was conducted in 2017 with a sample of the Korean working population. The survey gathered comprehensive information on working conditions to define workforce changes and the quality of work and life. The reliability and internal consistency of the WES-3 were assessed using the corrected item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the construct validity of work engagement. The convergent validity was assessed using the correlation with the WHO-5 well-being index. Correlations between work engagement and JD-R factors were also calculated. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha for work engagement was 0.776, indicating acceptable internal consistency. The model comprising 3 work engagement and 2 burnout items showed an excellent fit (χ(2): 382.05, Tucker-Lewis index: 0.984, comparative fit index: 0.994, root mean square error of approximation: 0.043). The convergent validity was significant (correlation coefficient: 0.42). Correlations with burnout and job demands were negligible, whereas correlations with job resources and job satisfaction were weakly positive. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study confirm that the WES-3 has acceptable reliability and validity. Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2020-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7406668/ /pubmed/32802343 http://dx.doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e27 Text en Copyright © 2020 Korean Society of Occupational & Environmental Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Choi, Maro
Suh, Chunhui
Choi, Seong Pil
Lee, Chae Kwan
Son, Byung Chul
Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_full Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_fullStr Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_short Validation of the Work Engagement Scale-3, used in the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey
title_sort validation of the work engagement scale-3, used in the 5th korean working conditions survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7406668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802343
http://dx.doi.org/10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e27
work_keys_str_mv AT choimaro validationoftheworkengagementscale3usedinthe5thkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT suhchunhui validationoftheworkengagementscale3usedinthe5thkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT choiseongpil validationoftheworkengagementscale3usedinthe5thkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT leechaekwan validationoftheworkengagementscale3usedinthe5thkoreanworkingconditionssurvey
AT sonbyungchul validationoftheworkengagementscale3usedinthe5thkoreanworkingconditionssurvey