Cargando…

Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have raised high expectations as a novel class of diagnostics and therapeutics. However, variabilities in EV isolation methods and the unresolved structural complexity of these biological-nanoparticles (sub-100 nm) necessitate rigorous biophysical characterization of sin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Shivani, LeClaire, Michael, Wohlschlegel, James, Gimzewski, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70245-1
_version_ 1783568913169121280
author Sharma, Shivani
LeClaire, Michael
Wohlschlegel, James
Gimzewski, James
author_facet Sharma, Shivani
LeClaire, Michael
Wohlschlegel, James
Gimzewski, James
author_sort Sharma, Shivani
collection PubMed
description Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have raised high expectations as a novel class of diagnostics and therapeutics. However, variabilities in EV isolation methods and the unresolved structural complexity of these biological-nanoparticles (sub-100 nm) necessitate rigorous biophysical characterization of single EVs. Here, using atomic force microscopy (AFM) in conjunction with direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), micro-fluidic resistive pore sizing (MRPS), and multi-angle light scattering (MALS) techniques, we compared the size, structure and unique surface properties of breast cancer cell-derived small EVs (sEV) obtained using four different isolation methods. AFM and dSTORM particle size distributions showed coherent unimodal and bimodal particle size populations isolated via centrifugation and immune-affinity methods respectively. More importantly, AFM imaging revealed striking differences in sEV nanoscale morphology, surface nano-roughness, and relative abundance of non-vesicles among different isolation methods. Precipitation-based isolation method exhibited the highest particle counts, yet nanoscale imaging revealed the additional presence of aggregates and polymeric residues. Together, our findings demonstrate the significance of orthogonal label-free surface characteristics of single sEVs, not discernable via conventional particle sizing and counts alone. Quantifying key nanoscale structural characteristics of sEVs, collectively termed ‘EV-nano-metrics’ enhances the understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of sEV isolates, with broad implications for EV-analyte based research and clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7414114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74141142020-08-10 Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles Sharma, Shivani LeClaire, Michael Wohlschlegel, James Gimzewski, James Sci Rep Article Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have raised high expectations as a novel class of diagnostics and therapeutics. However, variabilities in EV isolation methods and the unresolved structural complexity of these biological-nanoparticles (sub-100 nm) necessitate rigorous biophysical characterization of single EVs. Here, using atomic force microscopy (AFM) in conjunction with direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), micro-fluidic resistive pore sizing (MRPS), and multi-angle light scattering (MALS) techniques, we compared the size, structure and unique surface properties of breast cancer cell-derived small EVs (sEV) obtained using four different isolation methods. AFM and dSTORM particle size distributions showed coherent unimodal and bimodal particle size populations isolated via centrifugation and immune-affinity methods respectively. More importantly, AFM imaging revealed striking differences in sEV nanoscale morphology, surface nano-roughness, and relative abundance of non-vesicles among different isolation methods. Precipitation-based isolation method exhibited the highest particle counts, yet nanoscale imaging revealed the additional presence of aggregates and polymeric residues. Together, our findings demonstrate the significance of orthogonal label-free surface characteristics of single sEVs, not discernable via conventional particle sizing and counts alone. Quantifying key nanoscale structural characteristics of sEVs, collectively termed ‘EV-nano-metrics’ enhances the understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of sEV isolates, with broad implications for EV-analyte based research and clinical use. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7414114/ /pubmed/32770003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70245-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sharma, Shivani
LeClaire, Michael
Wohlschlegel, James
Gimzewski, James
Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title_full Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title_fullStr Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title_full_unstemmed Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title_short Impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
title_sort impact of isolation methods on the biophysical heterogeneity of single extracellular vesicles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7414114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32770003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70245-1
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmashivani impactofisolationmethodsonthebiophysicalheterogeneityofsingleextracellularvesicles
AT leclairemichael impactofisolationmethodsonthebiophysicalheterogeneityofsingleextracellularvesicles
AT wohlschlegeljames impactofisolationmethodsonthebiophysicalheterogeneityofsingleextracellularvesicles
AT gimzewskijames impactofisolationmethodsonthebiophysicalheterogeneityofsingleextracellularvesicles