Full-Field Electroretinography, Pupillometry, and Luminance Thresholds in X-Linked Retinoschisis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the nature and extent of functional abnormality in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) by comparing three dark-adapted, full-field measures: the electroretinogram (ERG), pupillary light reflex (PLR), and luminance threshold. METHODS: ERGs, PLRs (pupil constriction due to light stimulation), and luminance thresholds were measured from seven XLRS subjects and from 10 normally sighted, age-similar controls. ERGs and PLRs were obtained for a range of flash strengths, and these data were fit with Naka–Rushton functions to derive the maximum saturated b-wave (V(max)) and PLR (P(max)) amplitudes. Additionally, semi-saturation constants were obtained for the b-wave (σ) and PLR (s). Values of 1/σ and 1/s provide sensitivity measures. Full-field, dark-adapted luminance thresholds were measured using 465-nm and 642-nm flash stimuli. RESULTS: V (max) and 1/σ were significantly reduced in XLRS compared to the controls (both t ≥ 5.33, P < 0.001). In comparison, P(max) was normal in the XLRS subjects (t = 1.39, P = 0.19), but 1/s was reduced (t = 7.84, P < 0.001). Luminance thresholds for the control and XLRS groups did not differ significantly (F = 3.57, P = 0.08). Comparisons among measures indicated that pupil sensitivity was correlated with luminance threshold for the long- and short-wavelength stimuli (both, r ≥ 0.77, P ≤ 0.04). Correlations among all other measures were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the presumed bipolar cell dysfunction in XLRS, indicated by b-wave abnormalities, has complex downstream effects: Dark-adapted luminance threshold and maximum pupil responses are not significantly affected, but pupil sensitivity is reduced.