Cargando…

Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review

Sustainability certification schemes such as FAIRTRADE, FLO, WFTO and FT-USA have gained increasing markets. The significant growth of the fair trade (FT) movement in the last decades draws attention to ethical consumption. FT’s aim at improving the livelihoods of producers in developing countries a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina, Gale, Fred, Murphy-Gregory, Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123586
_version_ 1783571146032021504
author Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina
Gale, Fred
Murphy-Gregory, Hannah
author_facet Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina
Gale, Fred
Murphy-Gregory, Hannah
author_sort Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina
collection PubMed
description Sustainability certification schemes such as FAIRTRADE, FLO, WFTO and FT-USA have gained increasing markets. The significant growth of the fair trade (FT) movement in the last decades draws attention to ethical consumption. FT’s aim at improving the livelihoods of producers in developing countries and promotion of social change is considered a model that shows the benefits of trade to development. Although conveying a large number of publications, important questions about the movement remain under-explored. The literature is prolific on coffee, cacao, flowers, wine, and gold. In contrast, the engagement with staple foods – a prominent globally traded food category – seems minor. The primary objective of this review was to map the existing literature about FT and staple foods; then, to investigate the role of staple foods in the FT movement. The search strategy was designed to retrieve publications on the intersection of FT and staple foods. To date, there is no review about FT and staple foods nexus. Our systematic review addressed this gap considering FT as an alternative capable of addressing unsustainable food consumption and production impacts. Our research protocol included keywords searching across four databases, screening, and comparative analysis. From 283 documents retrieved, 49 were deemed relevant to reflect the role of staple foods in the FT movement. This systematic review discusses challenges and opportunities for the FT model to further engage with staples and recommends improvement of its environmental credentials. The present study can contribute by informing decision makers, policy makers, businesses, NGOs, producers, and consumers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7428751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74287512020-08-17 Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina Gale, Fred Murphy-Gregory, Hannah J Clean Prod Review Sustainability certification schemes such as FAIRTRADE, FLO, WFTO and FT-USA have gained increasing markets. The significant growth of the fair trade (FT) movement in the last decades draws attention to ethical consumption. FT’s aim at improving the livelihoods of producers in developing countries and promotion of social change is considered a model that shows the benefits of trade to development. Although conveying a large number of publications, important questions about the movement remain under-explored. The literature is prolific on coffee, cacao, flowers, wine, and gold. In contrast, the engagement with staple foods – a prominent globally traded food category – seems minor. The primary objective of this review was to map the existing literature about FT and staple foods; then, to investigate the role of staple foods in the FT movement. The search strategy was designed to retrieve publications on the intersection of FT and staple foods. To date, there is no review about FT and staple foods nexus. Our systematic review addressed this gap considering FT as an alternative capable of addressing unsustainable food consumption and production impacts. Our research protocol included keywords searching across four databases, screening, and comparative analysis. From 283 documents retrieved, 49 were deemed relevant to reflect the role of staple foods in the FT movement. This systematic review discusses challenges and opportunities for the FT model to further engage with staples and recommends improvement of its environmental credentials. The present study can contribute by informing decision makers, policy makers, businesses, NGOs, producers, and consumers. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-01-10 2020-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7428751/ /pubmed/32836913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123586 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Ribeiro-Duthie, Ana Cristina
Gale, Fred
Murphy-Gregory, Hannah
Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title_full Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title_fullStr Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title_short Fair trade and staple foods: A systematic review
title_sort fair trade and staple foods: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32836913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123586
work_keys_str_mv AT ribeiroduthieanacristina fairtradeandstaplefoodsasystematicreview
AT galefred fairtradeandstaplefoodsasystematicreview
AT murphygregoryhannah fairtradeandstaplefoodsasystematicreview