Cargando…

Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Sneha Rajiv, Sui, Yuan, Ng, Cheng Han, Chen, Zhi Xiong, Goh, Lay Hoon, Shorey, Shefaly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237647
_version_ 1783571480955584512
author Jain, Sneha Rajiv
Sui, Yuan
Ng, Cheng Han
Chen, Zhi Xiong
Goh, Lay Hoon
Shorey, Shefaly
author_facet Jain, Sneha Rajiv
Sui, Yuan
Ng, Cheng Han
Chen, Zhi Xiong
Goh, Lay Hoon
Shorey, Shefaly
author_sort Jain, Sneha Rajiv
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoptions of such education by adults with type 2 diabetes and their HCPs. METHODS: We systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO) until August 2019. The search included qualitative and mixed-method studies that reported the views of patients and HCPs regarding features, uses, and implementations of technology-assisted DSME. Data were synthesized through an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included, involving 242 patients, ranging from 18 to 81 years and included web-based, mobile application, digital versatile disc (DVD), virtual reality or telehealth interventions. Patients and HCPs had mixed views towards features of the technology-assisted interventions, with patients’ personal qualities and HCPs’ concerns affecting uses of the interventions. Patients generally preferred technologies that were easy to access, use, and apply and that had reliable information. Patients’ ambitions motivated them, and personal attributes such as poor competence with technology, poor literacy, and language barriers acted as barriers. Patients especially liked the peer support that they received but did not like it when there was no regulation of advice on these platforms. HCPs believed that while the interventions were useful to patients, they faced difficulties with integration into their clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: This review explored the features of technology-assisted diabetes self-management education interventions that enhanced positive patient engagements and the negative aspects of both the platforms and the target groups. Technical support and training will be effective in managing these concerns and ensuring meaningful use of these platforms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7430746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74307462020-08-20 Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review Jain, Sneha Rajiv Sui, Yuan Ng, Cheng Han Chen, Zhi Xiong Goh, Lay Hoon Shorey, Shefaly PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education is a key aspect in the long-term management of type 2 diabetes. The patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspective on the use of technology-assisted DSME has yet to be studied. Hence, the objective of this study was to better understand the factors that facilitate or hinder the adoptions of such education by adults with type 2 diabetes and their HCPs. METHODS: We systematically searched five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection, and PsycINFO) until August 2019. The search included qualitative and mixed-method studies that reported the views of patients and HCPs regarding features, uses, and implementations of technology-assisted DSME. Data were synthesized through an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13 articles were included, involving 242 patients, ranging from 18 to 81 years and included web-based, mobile application, digital versatile disc (DVD), virtual reality or telehealth interventions. Patients and HCPs had mixed views towards features of the technology-assisted interventions, with patients’ personal qualities and HCPs’ concerns affecting uses of the interventions. Patients generally preferred technologies that were easy to access, use, and apply and that had reliable information. Patients’ ambitions motivated them, and personal attributes such as poor competence with technology, poor literacy, and language barriers acted as barriers. Patients especially liked the peer support that they received but did not like it when there was no regulation of advice on these platforms. HCPs believed that while the interventions were useful to patients, they faced difficulties with integration into their clinical workflows. CONCLUSION: This review explored the features of technology-assisted diabetes self-management education interventions that enhanced positive patient engagements and the negative aspects of both the platforms and the target groups. Technical support and training will be effective in managing these concerns and ensuring meaningful use of these platforms. Public Library of Science 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7430746/ /pubmed/32804989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237647 Text en © 2020 Jain et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jain, Sneha Rajiv
Sui, Yuan
Ng, Cheng Han
Chen, Zhi Xiong
Goh, Lay Hoon
Shorey, Shefaly
Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title_full Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title_fullStr Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title_short Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. A qualitative systematic review
title_sort patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives towards technology-assisted diabetes self-management education. a qualitative systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7430746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237647
work_keys_str_mv AT jainsneharajiv patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview
AT suiyuan patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview
AT ngchenghan patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview
AT chenzhixiong patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview
AT gohlayhoon patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview
AT shoreyshefaly patientsandhealthcareprofessionalsperspectivestowardstechnologyassisteddiabetesselfmanagementeducationaqualitativesystematicreview