Cargando…

A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students

BACKGROUND: The use of feedback has been integral to medical student learning, but rigorous evidence to evaluate its education effect is limited, especially in the role of patient feedback in clinical teaching and practice improvement. The aim of the Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) Feedback Study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lai, Michelle M. Y., Roberts, Noel, Mohebbi, Mohammadreza, Martin, Jenepher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02171-9
_version_ 1783573022087577600
author Lai, Michelle M. Y.
Roberts, Noel
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Martin, Jenepher
author_facet Lai, Michelle M. Y.
Roberts, Noel
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Martin, Jenepher
author_sort Lai, Michelle M. Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of feedback has been integral to medical student learning, but rigorous evidence to evaluate its education effect is limited, especially in the role of patient feedback in clinical teaching and practice improvement. The aim of the Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) Feedback Study was to evaluate whether additional written consumer feedback on patient satisfaction improved consultation skills among medical students and whether multisource feedback (MSF) improved student performance. METHODS: In this single site, double-blinded randomised controlled trial, 71 eligible medical students from two universities in their first clinical year were allocated to intervention or control and followed up for one semester. They participated in five simulated student-led consultations in a teaching clinic with patient volunteers living with chronic illness. Students in the intervention group received additional written feedback on patient satisfaction combined with guided self-reflection. The control group received usual immediate formative multisource feedback from tutors, patients and peers. Student characteristics, baseline patient-rated satisfaction scores and tutor-rated consultation skills were measured. RESULTS: Follow-up assessments were complete in 70 students attending the MSF program. At the final consultation episodes, both groups improved patient-rated rapport (P = 0.002), tutor-rated patient-centeredness and tutor-rated overall consultation skills (P = 0.01). The intervention group showed significantly better tutor-rated patient-centeredness (P = 0.003) comparing with the control group. Distress relief, communication comfort, rapport reported by patients and tutor-rated clinical skills did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative multisource feedback program effectively improved consultation skills in medical students. Structured written consumer feedback combined with guided student reflection further improved patient-centred practice and effectively enhanced the benefit of an MSF model. This strategy might provide a valuable adjunct to communication skills education for medical students. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12613001055796.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7439652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74396522020-08-24 A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students Lai, Michelle M. Y. Roberts, Noel Mohebbi, Mohammadreza Martin, Jenepher BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The use of feedback has been integral to medical student learning, but rigorous evidence to evaluate its education effect is limited, especially in the role of patient feedback in clinical teaching and practice improvement. The aim of the Patient Teaching Associate (PTA) Feedback Study was to evaluate whether additional written consumer feedback on patient satisfaction improved consultation skills among medical students and whether multisource feedback (MSF) improved student performance. METHODS: In this single site, double-blinded randomised controlled trial, 71 eligible medical students from two universities in their first clinical year were allocated to intervention or control and followed up for one semester. They participated in five simulated student-led consultations in a teaching clinic with patient volunteers living with chronic illness. Students in the intervention group received additional written feedback on patient satisfaction combined with guided self-reflection. The control group received usual immediate formative multisource feedback from tutors, patients and peers. Student characteristics, baseline patient-rated satisfaction scores and tutor-rated consultation skills were measured. RESULTS: Follow-up assessments were complete in 70 students attending the MSF program. At the final consultation episodes, both groups improved patient-rated rapport (P = 0.002), tutor-rated patient-centeredness and tutor-rated overall consultation skills (P = 0.01). The intervention group showed significantly better tutor-rated patient-centeredness (P = 0.003) comparing with the control group. Distress relief, communication comfort, rapport reported by patients and tutor-rated clinical skills did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative multisource feedback program effectively improved consultation skills in medical students. Structured written consumer feedback combined with guided student reflection further improved patient-centred practice and effectively enhanced the benefit of an MSF model. This strategy might provide a valuable adjunct to communication skills education for medical students. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12613001055796. BioMed Central 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7439652/ /pubmed/32819352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02171-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lai, Michelle M. Y.
Roberts, Noel
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Martin, Jenepher
A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title_full A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title_fullStr A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title_full_unstemmed A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title_short A randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
title_sort randomised controlled trial of feedback to improve patient satisfaction and consultation skills in medical students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32819352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02171-9
work_keys_str_mv AT laimichellemy arandomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT robertsnoel arandomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT mohebbimohammadreza arandomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT martinjenepher arandomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT laimichellemy randomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT robertsnoel randomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT mohebbimohammadreza randomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents
AT martinjenepher randomisedcontrolledtrialoffeedbacktoimprovepatientsatisfactionandconsultationskillsinmedicalstudents