Cargando…

Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment

PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schuster, Eugene F., Gellert, Pascal, Segal, Corrinne V., López-Knowles, Elena, Buus, Richard, Cheang, Maggie Chon U., Morden, James, Robertson, John, Bliss, Judith M., Smith, Ian, Dowsett, Mitch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286
_version_ 1783574141487546368
author Schuster, Eugene F.
Gellert, Pascal
Segal, Corrinne V.
López-Knowles, Elena
Buus, Richard
Cheang, Maggie Chon U.
Morden, James
Robertson, John
Bliss, Judith M.
Smith, Ian
Dowsett, Mitch
author_facet Schuster, Eugene F.
Gellert, Pascal
Segal, Corrinne V.
López-Knowles, Elena
Buus, Richard
Cheang, Maggie Chon U.
Morden, James
Robertson, John
Bliss, Judith M.
Smith, Ian
Dowsett, Mitch
author_sort Schuster, Eugene F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and prognosis. SCNAs to specific genes may drive intrinsic resistance, or high genomic instability may drive tumor heterogeneity, which allows differential response across tumors and surviving cells to evolve resistance to treatment rapidly. We therefore evaluated the relationship between SCNAs and intrinsic resistance to treatment as measured by a poor antiproliferative response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCNAs were determined by single nucleotide polymorphism array in baseline and surgery core-cuts from 73 postmenopausal patients randomly assigned to receive 2 weeks of preoperative AI or no AI in the Perioperative Endocrine Therapy—Individualizing Care (POETIC) trial. Fifty-six samples from the AI group included 28 poor responders (PrRs, less than 60% reduction in protein encoded by the MKI67 gene [Ki-67]) and 28 good responders (GdRs, greater than 75% reduction in Ki-67). Exome sequencing was available for 72 pairs of samples. RESULTS: Genomic instability correlated with Ki-67 expression at both baseline (P < .001) and surgery (P < .001) and was higher in PrRs (P = .048). The SCNA with the largest difference between GdRs and PrRs was loss of heterozygosity observed at 17p (false discovery rate, 0.08), which includes TP53. Nine of 28 PrRs had loss of wild-type TP53 as a result of mutations and loss of heterozygosity compared with three of 28 GdRs. In PrRs, somatic alterations of TP53 were associated with higher genomic instability, higher baseline Ki-67, and greater resistance to AI treatment compared with wild-type TP53. CONCLUSION: We observed that primary tumors with high genomic instability have an intrinsic resistance to AI treatment and do not require additional evolution to develop resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7446335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Society of Clinical Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74463352020-09-09 Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment Schuster, Eugene F. Gellert, Pascal Segal, Corrinne V. López-Knowles, Elena Buus, Richard Cheang, Maggie Chon U. Morden, James Robertson, John Bliss, Judith M. Smith, Ian Dowsett, Mitch JCO Precis Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and prognosis. SCNAs to specific genes may drive intrinsic resistance, or high genomic instability may drive tumor heterogeneity, which allows differential response across tumors and surviving cells to evolve resistance to treatment rapidly. We therefore evaluated the relationship between SCNAs and intrinsic resistance to treatment as measured by a poor antiproliferative response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCNAs were determined by single nucleotide polymorphism array in baseline and surgery core-cuts from 73 postmenopausal patients randomly assigned to receive 2 weeks of preoperative AI or no AI in the Perioperative Endocrine Therapy—Individualizing Care (POETIC) trial. Fifty-six samples from the AI group included 28 poor responders (PrRs, less than 60% reduction in protein encoded by the MKI67 gene [Ki-67]) and 28 good responders (GdRs, greater than 75% reduction in Ki-67). Exome sequencing was available for 72 pairs of samples. RESULTS: Genomic instability correlated with Ki-67 expression at both baseline (P < .001) and surgery (P < .001) and was higher in PrRs (P = .048). The SCNA with the largest difference between GdRs and PrRs was loss of heterozygosity observed at 17p (false discovery rate, 0.08), which includes TP53. Nine of 28 PrRs had loss of wild-type TP53 as a result of mutations and loss of heterozygosity compared with three of 28 GdRs. In PrRs, somatic alterations of TP53 were associated with higher genomic instability, higher baseline Ki-67, and greater resistance to AI treatment compared with wild-type TP53. CONCLUSION: We observed that primary tumors with high genomic instability have an intrinsic resistance to AI treatment and do not require additional evolution to develop resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7446335/ /pubmed/32914010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286 Text en © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Reports
Schuster, Eugene F.
Gellert, Pascal
Segal, Corrinne V.
López-Knowles, Elena
Buus, Richard
Cheang, Maggie Chon U.
Morden, James
Robertson, John
Bliss, Judith M.
Smith, Ian
Dowsett, Mitch
Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title_full Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title_fullStr Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title_short Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
title_sort genomic instability and tp53 genomic alterations associate with poor antiproliferative response and intrinsic resistance to aromatase inhibitor treatment
topic Original Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286
work_keys_str_mv AT schustereugenef genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT gellertpascal genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT segalcorrinnev genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT lopezknowleselena genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT buusrichard genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT cheangmaggiechonu genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT mordenjames genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT robertsonjohn genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT blissjudithm genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT smithian genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT dowsettmitch genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment
AT genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment