Cargando…
Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment
PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286 |
_version_ | 1783574141487546368 |
---|---|
author | Schuster, Eugene F. Gellert, Pascal Segal, Corrinne V. López-Knowles, Elena Buus, Richard Cheang, Maggie Chon U. Morden, James Robertson, John Bliss, Judith M. Smith, Ian Dowsett, Mitch |
author_facet | Schuster, Eugene F. Gellert, Pascal Segal, Corrinne V. López-Knowles, Elena Buus, Richard Cheang, Maggie Chon U. Morden, James Robertson, John Bliss, Judith M. Smith, Ian Dowsett, Mitch |
author_sort | Schuster, Eugene F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and prognosis. SCNAs to specific genes may drive intrinsic resistance, or high genomic instability may drive tumor heterogeneity, which allows differential response across tumors and surviving cells to evolve resistance to treatment rapidly. We therefore evaluated the relationship between SCNAs and intrinsic resistance to treatment as measured by a poor antiproliferative response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCNAs were determined by single nucleotide polymorphism array in baseline and surgery core-cuts from 73 postmenopausal patients randomly assigned to receive 2 weeks of preoperative AI or no AI in the Perioperative Endocrine Therapy—Individualizing Care (POETIC) trial. Fifty-six samples from the AI group included 28 poor responders (PrRs, less than 60% reduction in protein encoded by the MKI67 gene [Ki-67]) and 28 good responders (GdRs, greater than 75% reduction in Ki-67). Exome sequencing was available for 72 pairs of samples. RESULTS: Genomic instability correlated with Ki-67 expression at both baseline (P < .001) and surgery (P < .001) and was higher in PrRs (P = .048). The SCNA with the largest difference between GdRs and PrRs was loss of heterozygosity observed at 17p (false discovery rate, 0.08), which includes TP53. Nine of 28 PrRs had loss of wild-type TP53 as a result of mutations and loss of heterozygosity compared with three of 28 GdRs. In PrRs, somatic alterations of TP53 were associated with higher genomic instability, higher baseline Ki-67, and greater resistance to AI treatment compared with wild-type TP53. CONCLUSION: We observed that primary tumors with high genomic instability have an intrinsic resistance to AI treatment and do not require additional evolution to develop resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7446335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74463352020-09-09 Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment Schuster, Eugene F. Gellert, Pascal Segal, Corrinne V. López-Knowles, Elena Buus, Richard Cheang, Maggie Chon U. Morden, James Robertson, John Bliss, Judith M. Smith, Ian Dowsett, Mitch JCO Precis Oncol Original Reports PURPOSE: Although aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment is effective in estrogen receptor–positive postmenopausal breast cancer, resistance is common and incompletely explained. Genomic instability, as measured by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), is important in breast cancer development and prognosis. SCNAs to specific genes may drive intrinsic resistance, or high genomic instability may drive tumor heterogeneity, which allows differential response across tumors and surviving cells to evolve resistance to treatment rapidly. We therefore evaluated the relationship between SCNAs and intrinsic resistance to treatment as measured by a poor antiproliferative response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCNAs were determined by single nucleotide polymorphism array in baseline and surgery core-cuts from 73 postmenopausal patients randomly assigned to receive 2 weeks of preoperative AI or no AI in the Perioperative Endocrine Therapy—Individualizing Care (POETIC) trial. Fifty-six samples from the AI group included 28 poor responders (PrRs, less than 60% reduction in protein encoded by the MKI67 gene [Ki-67]) and 28 good responders (GdRs, greater than 75% reduction in Ki-67). Exome sequencing was available for 72 pairs of samples. RESULTS: Genomic instability correlated with Ki-67 expression at both baseline (P < .001) and surgery (P < .001) and was higher in PrRs (P = .048). The SCNA with the largest difference between GdRs and PrRs was loss of heterozygosity observed at 17p (false discovery rate, 0.08), which includes TP53. Nine of 28 PrRs had loss of wild-type TP53 as a result of mutations and loss of heterozygosity compared with three of 28 GdRs. In PrRs, somatic alterations of TP53 were associated with higher genomic instability, higher baseline Ki-67, and greater resistance to AI treatment compared with wild-type TP53. CONCLUSION: We observed that primary tumors with high genomic instability have an intrinsic resistance to AI treatment and do not require additional evolution to develop resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7446335/ /pubmed/32914010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286 Text en © 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Reports Schuster, Eugene F. Gellert, Pascal Segal, Corrinne V. López-Knowles, Elena Buus, Richard Cheang, Maggie Chon U. Morden, James Robertson, John Bliss, Judith M. Smith, Ian Dowsett, Mitch Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title | Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title_full | Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title_fullStr | Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title_short | Genomic Instability and TP53 Genomic Alterations Associate With Poor Antiproliferative Response and Intrinsic Resistance to Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment |
title_sort | genomic instability and tp53 genomic alterations associate with poor antiproliferative response and intrinsic resistance to aromatase inhibitor treatment |
topic | Original Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7446335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schustereugenef genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT gellertpascal genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT segalcorrinnev genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT lopezknowleselena genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT buusrichard genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT cheangmaggiechonu genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT mordenjames genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT robertsonjohn genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT blissjudithm genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT smithian genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT dowsettmitch genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment AT genomicinstabilityandtp53genomicalterationsassociatewithpoorantiproliferativeresponseandintrinsicresistancetoaromataseinhibitortreatment |