Cargando…
Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II)
INTRODUCTION: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Over the past 20 years, a number of new drugs have been approved for National Health Service (NHS) use on the basis of information from short-term trials that demonstrate efficacy. These trials do not provide informatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040635 |
_version_ | 1783574947688349696 |
---|---|
author | Balabanova, Silviya Taylor, Claire Sills, Graeme Burnside, Girvan Plumpton, Catrin Smith, Phil E M Appleton, Richard Leach, John Paul Johnson, Michael Baker, Gus Pirmohamed, Munir Hughes, Dyfrig A Williamson, Paula R Tudur-Smith, Catrin Marson, Anthony Guy |
author_facet | Balabanova, Silviya Taylor, Claire Sills, Graeme Burnside, Girvan Plumpton, Catrin Smith, Phil E M Appleton, Richard Leach, John Paul Johnson, Michael Baker, Gus Pirmohamed, Munir Hughes, Dyfrig A Williamson, Paula R Tudur-Smith, Catrin Marson, Anthony Guy |
author_sort | Balabanova, Silviya |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Over the past 20 years, a number of new drugs have been approved for National Health Service (NHS) use on the basis of information from short-term trials that demonstrate efficacy. These trials do not provide information about the longer term outcomes, which inform treatment policy. This trial will assess the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of the newer treatment levetiracetam and zonisamide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing new and standard treatments for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Arm A of the trial randomised 990 patients with focal epilepsy to standard AED lamotrigine or new AED levetiracetam or zonisamide. Arm B randomised 520 patients with generalised epilepsy to standard AED sodium valproate or new AED levetiracetam. Patients are recruited from UK NHS outpatient epilepsy, general neurology and paediatric clinics. Included patients are aged 5 years or older with two or more spontaneous seizures requiring AED monotherapy, who are not previously treated with AEDs. Patients are followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The primary outcome is time to 12-month remission from seizures. Secondary outcomes include time to treatment failure (including due to inadequate seizure control or unacceptable adverse reactions); time to first seizure; time to 24-month remission; adverse reactions and quality of life. All primary analyses will be on an intention to treat basis. Separate analyses will be undertaken for each arm. Health economic analysis will be conducted from the perspective of the NHS to assess the cost-effectiveness of each AED. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the North West-Liverpool East REC (Ref. 12/NW/0361). The trial team will disseminate the results through scientific meetings, peer-reviewed publications and patient and public involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2012-001884-64; ISRCTN30294119. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7451282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74512822020-09-02 Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) Balabanova, Silviya Taylor, Claire Sills, Graeme Burnside, Girvan Plumpton, Catrin Smith, Phil E M Appleton, Richard Leach, John Paul Johnson, Michael Baker, Gus Pirmohamed, Munir Hughes, Dyfrig A Williamson, Paula R Tudur-Smith, Catrin Marson, Anthony Guy BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Over the past 20 years, a number of new drugs have been approved for National Health Service (NHS) use on the basis of information from short-term trials that demonstrate efficacy. These trials do not provide information about the longer term outcomes, which inform treatment policy. This trial will assess the long-term clinical and cost-effectiveness of the newer treatment levetiracetam and zonisamide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing new and standard treatments for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Arm A of the trial randomised 990 patients with focal epilepsy to standard AED lamotrigine or new AED levetiracetam or zonisamide. Arm B randomised 520 patients with generalised epilepsy to standard AED sodium valproate or new AED levetiracetam. Patients are recruited from UK NHS outpatient epilepsy, general neurology and paediatric clinics. Included patients are aged 5 years or older with two or more spontaneous seizures requiring AED monotherapy, who are not previously treated with AEDs. Patients are followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The primary outcome is time to 12-month remission from seizures. Secondary outcomes include time to treatment failure (including due to inadequate seizure control or unacceptable adverse reactions); time to first seizure; time to 24-month remission; adverse reactions and quality of life. All primary analyses will be on an intention to treat basis. Separate analyses will be undertaken for each arm. Health economic analysis will be conducted from the perspective of the NHS to assess the cost-effectiveness of each AED. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the North West-Liverpool East REC (Ref. 12/NW/0361). The trial team will disseminate the results through scientific meetings, peer-reviewed publications and patient and public involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2012-001884-64; ISRCTN30294119. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7451282/ /pubmed/32847927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040635 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Balabanova, Silviya Taylor, Claire Sills, Graeme Burnside, Girvan Plumpton, Catrin Smith, Phil E M Appleton, Richard Leach, John Paul Johnson, Michael Baker, Gus Pirmohamed, Munir Hughes, Dyfrig A Williamson, Paula R Tudur-Smith, Catrin Marson, Anthony Guy Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title | Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title_full | Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title_fullStr | Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title_full_unstemmed | Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title_short | Study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (SANAD-II) |
title_sort | study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of levetiracetam and zonisamide versus standard treatments for epilepsy: a comparison of standard and new antiepileptic drugs (sanad-ii) |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7451282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32847927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040635 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT balabanovasilviya studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT taylorclaire studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT sillsgraeme studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT burnsidegirvan studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT plumptoncatrin studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT smithphilem studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT appletonrichard studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT leachjohnpaul studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT johnsonmichael studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT bakergus studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT pirmohamedmunir studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT hughesdyfriga studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT williamsonpaular studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT tudursmithcatrin studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii AT marsonanthonyguy studyprotocolforapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessoflevetiracetamandzonisamideversusstandardtreatmentsforepilepsyacomparisonofstandardandnewantiepilepticdrugssanadii |