Cargando…

The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis

Comparison is a cognitive process and a method of acquiring geographical knowledge widely promoted within school systems in Germany, France and England. Comparison is an everyday practice, but it is also one of the methods systematically used by geographers and serves various scientific purposes. Ho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simon, Marine, Budke, Alexandra, Schäbitz, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04420
_version_ 1783575162894942208
author Simon, Marine
Budke, Alexandra
Schäbitz, Frank
author_facet Simon, Marine
Budke, Alexandra
Schäbitz, Frank
author_sort Simon, Marine
collection PubMed
description Comparison is a cognitive process and a method of acquiring geographical knowledge widely promoted within school systems in Germany, France and England. Comparison is an everyday practice, but it is also one of the methods systematically used by geographers and serves various scientific purposes. However, little is known about the functions, extent and objectives of comparison tasks in geography education. This study presents an analysis of 20 textbooks from three countries: Germany, England and France. In this international comparative study we analysed all cognitive tasks involving comparison using qualitative content analysis and descriptive quantitative methods. We developed a reliable classification system for categorising the objectives of comparison tasks. In our results we demonstrated that a large proportion of comparison tasks in textbooks are simple, lower-order tasks. Also, many complex tasks in the three countries involve inductive processes, although we identified some national differences resulting from differing textbook structures. Our system for classifying the objectives of comparison tasks will help develop meaningful tasks, aiming to enhance students’ autonomous and critical thinking, and improve their proficiency in the competencies and methods required in geography education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7452448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74524482020-09-02 The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis Simon, Marine Budke, Alexandra Schäbitz, Frank Heliyon Article Comparison is a cognitive process and a method of acquiring geographical knowledge widely promoted within school systems in Germany, France and England. Comparison is an everyday practice, but it is also one of the methods systematically used by geographers and serves various scientific purposes. However, little is known about the functions, extent and objectives of comparison tasks in geography education. This study presents an analysis of 20 textbooks from three countries: Germany, England and France. In this international comparative study we analysed all cognitive tasks involving comparison using qualitative content analysis and descriptive quantitative methods. We developed a reliable classification system for categorising the objectives of comparison tasks. In our results we demonstrated that a large proportion of comparison tasks in textbooks are simple, lower-order tasks. Also, many complex tasks in the three countries involve inductive processes, although we identified some national differences resulting from differing textbook structures. Our system for classifying the objectives of comparison tasks will help develop meaningful tasks, aiming to enhance students’ autonomous and critical thinking, and improve their proficiency in the competencies and methods required in geography education. Elsevier 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7452448/ /pubmed/32885061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04420 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simon, Marine
Budke, Alexandra
Schäbitz, Frank
The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title_full The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title_fullStr The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title_short The objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
title_sort objectives and uses of comparisons in geography textbooks: results of an international comparative analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7452448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04420
work_keys_str_mv AT simonmarine theobjectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis
AT budkealexandra theobjectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis
AT schabitzfrank theobjectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis
AT simonmarine objectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis
AT budkealexandra objectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis
AT schabitzfrank objectivesandusesofcomparisonsingeographytextbooksresultsofaninternationalcomparativeanalysis