Cargando…
A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data
DNA methylation change has been useful for cancer biomarker discovery, classification, and potential treatment development. So far, existing methods use either differentially methylated CpG sites or combined CpG sites, namely differentially methylated regions, that can be mapped to genes. However, s...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11080931 |
_version_ | 1783577521505173504 |
---|---|
author | Mallik, Saurav Seth, Soumita Bhadra, Tapas Zhao, Zhongming |
author_facet | Mallik, Saurav Seth, Soumita Bhadra, Tapas Zhao, Zhongming |
author_sort | Mallik, Saurav |
collection | PubMed |
description | DNA methylation change has been useful for cancer biomarker discovery, classification, and potential treatment development. So far, existing methods use either differentially methylated CpG sites or combined CpG sites, namely differentially methylated regions, that can be mapped to genes. However, such methylation signal mapping has limitations. To address these limitations, in this study, we introduced a combinatorial framework using linear regression, differential expression, deep learning method for accurate biological interpretation of DNA methylation through integrating DNA methylation data and corresponding TCGA gene expression data. We demonstrated it for uterine cervical cancer. First, we pre-filtered outliers from the data set and then determined the predicted gene expression value from the pre-filtered methylation data through linear regression. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by Empirical Bayes test using [Formula: see text]. Then we applied a deep learning method, “nnet” to classify the cervical cancer label of those DEGs to determine all classification metrics including accuracy and area under curve (AUC) through 10-fold cross validation. We applied our approach to uterine cervical cancer DNA methylation dataset (NCBI accession ID: GSE30760, 27,578 features covering 63 tumor and 152 matched normal samples). After linear regression and differential expression analysis, we obtained 6287 DEGs with false discovery rate (FDR) [Formula: see text]. After performing deep learning analysis, we obtained average classification accuracy [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) of the uterine cervical cancerous labels. This performance is better than that of other peer methods. We performed in-degree and out-degree hub gene network analysis using [Formula: see text]. We reported five top in-degree genes ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) and five top out-degree genes ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). After that, we performed KEGG pathway and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs using tool WebGestalt(WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit). In summary, our proposed framework that integrated linear regression, differential expression, deep learning provides a robust approach to better interpret DNA methylation analysis and gene expression data in disease study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74651382020-09-04 A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data Mallik, Saurav Seth, Soumita Bhadra, Tapas Zhao, Zhongming Genes (Basel) Article DNA methylation change has been useful for cancer biomarker discovery, classification, and potential treatment development. So far, existing methods use either differentially methylated CpG sites or combined CpG sites, namely differentially methylated regions, that can be mapped to genes. However, such methylation signal mapping has limitations. To address these limitations, in this study, we introduced a combinatorial framework using linear regression, differential expression, deep learning method for accurate biological interpretation of DNA methylation through integrating DNA methylation data and corresponding TCGA gene expression data. We demonstrated it for uterine cervical cancer. First, we pre-filtered outliers from the data set and then determined the predicted gene expression value from the pre-filtered methylation data through linear regression. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by Empirical Bayes test using [Formula: see text]. Then we applied a deep learning method, “nnet” to classify the cervical cancer label of those DEGs to determine all classification metrics including accuracy and area under curve (AUC) through 10-fold cross validation. We applied our approach to uterine cervical cancer DNA methylation dataset (NCBI accession ID: GSE30760, 27,578 features covering 63 tumor and 152 matched normal samples). After linear regression and differential expression analysis, we obtained 6287 DEGs with false discovery rate (FDR) [Formula: see text]. After performing deep learning analysis, we obtained average classification accuracy [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) of the uterine cervical cancerous labels. This performance is better than that of other peer methods. We performed in-degree and out-degree hub gene network analysis using [Formula: see text]. We reported five top in-degree genes ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) and five top out-degree genes ([Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] , [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). After that, we performed KEGG pathway and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs using tool WebGestalt(WEB-based Gene SeT AnaLysis Toolkit). In summary, our proposed framework that integrated linear regression, differential expression, deep learning provides a robust approach to better interpret DNA methylation analysis and gene expression data in disease study. MDPI 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7465138/ /pubmed/32806782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11080931 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Mallik, Saurav Seth, Soumita Bhadra, Tapas Zhao, Zhongming A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title | A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title_full | A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title_fullStr | A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title_full_unstemmed | A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title_short | A Linear Regression and Deep Learning Approach for Detecting Reliable Genetic Alterations in Cancer Using DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Data |
title_sort | linear regression and deep learning approach for detecting reliable genetic alterations in cancer using dna methylation and gene expression data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes11080931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malliksaurav alinearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT sethsoumita alinearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT bhadratapas alinearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT zhaozhongming alinearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT malliksaurav linearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT sethsoumita linearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT bhadratapas linearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata AT zhaozhongming linearregressionanddeeplearningapproachfordetectingreliablegeneticalterationsincancerusingdnamethylationandgeneexpressiondata |