Cargando…

Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement

DNA methylation plays an important role in both normal human development and risk of disease. The most utilized method of assessing DNA methylation uses BeadChips, generating an epigenome-wide “snapshot” of >450,000 observations (probe measurements) per assay. However, the reliability of each of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sugden, Karen, Hannon, Eilis J., Arseneault, Louise, Belsky, Daniel W., Corcoran, David L., Fisher, Helen L., Houts, Renate M., Kandaswamy, Radhika, Moffitt, Terrie E., Poulton, Richie, Prinz, Joseph A., Rasmussen, Line J.H., Williams, Benjamin S., Wong, Chloe C.Y., Mill, Jonathan, Caspi, Avshalom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014
_version_ 1783577969645584384
author Sugden, Karen
Hannon, Eilis J.
Arseneault, Louise
Belsky, Daniel W.
Corcoran, David L.
Fisher, Helen L.
Houts, Renate M.
Kandaswamy, Radhika
Moffitt, Terrie E.
Poulton, Richie
Prinz, Joseph A.
Rasmussen, Line J.H.
Williams, Benjamin S.
Wong, Chloe C.Y.
Mill, Jonathan
Caspi, Avshalom
author_facet Sugden, Karen
Hannon, Eilis J.
Arseneault, Louise
Belsky, Daniel W.
Corcoran, David L.
Fisher, Helen L.
Houts, Renate M.
Kandaswamy, Radhika
Moffitt, Terrie E.
Poulton, Richie
Prinz, Joseph A.
Rasmussen, Line J.H.
Williams, Benjamin S.
Wong, Chloe C.Y.
Mill, Jonathan
Caspi, Avshalom
author_sort Sugden, Karen
collection PubMed
description DNA methylation plays an important role in both normal human development and risk of disease. The most utilized method of assessing DNA methylation uses BeadChips, generating an epigenome-wide “snapshot” of >450,000 observations (probe measurements) per assay. However, the reliability of each of these measurements is not equal, and little consideration is paid to consequences for research. We correlated repeat measurements of the same DNA samples using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K and the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips in 350 blood DNA samples. Probes that were reliably measured were more heritable and showed consistent associations with environmental exposures, gene expression, and greater cross-tissue concordance. Unreliable probes were less replicable and generated an unknown volume of false negatives. This serves as a lesson for working with DNA methylation data, but the lessons are equally applicable to working with other data: as we advance toward generating increasingly greater volumes of data, failure to document reliability risks harming reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74672142020-09-02 Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement Sugden, Karen Hannon, Eilis J. Arseneault, Louise Belsky, Daniel W. Corcoran, David L. Fisher, Helen L. Houts, Renate M. Kandaswamy, Radhika Moffitt, Terrie E. Poulton, Richie Prinz, Joseph A. Rasmussen, Line J.H. Williams, Benjamin S. Wong, Chloe C.Y. Mill, Jonathan Caspi, Avshalom Patterns (N Y) Article DNA methylation plays an important role in both normal human development and risk of disease. The most utilized method of assessing DNA methylation uses BeadChips, generating an epigenome-wide “snapshot” of >450,000 observations (probe measurements) per assay. However, the reliability of each of these measurements is not equal, and little consideration is paid to consequences for research. We correlated repeat measurements of the same DNA samples using the Illumina HumanMethylation450K and the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChips in 350 blood DNA samples. Probes that were reliably measured were more heritable and showed consistent associations with environmental exposures, gene expression, and greater cross-tissue concordance. Unreliable probes were less replicable and generated an unknown volume of false negatives. This serves as a lesson for working with DNA methylation data, but the lessons are equally applicable to working with other data: as we advance toward generating increasingly greater volumes of data, failure to document reliability risks harming reproducibility. Elsevier 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7467214/ /pubmed/32885222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sugden, Karen
Hannon, Eilis J.
Arseneault, Louise
Belsky, Daniel W.
Corcoran, David L.
Fisher, Helen L.
Houts, Renate M.
Kandaswamy, Radhika
Moffitt, Terrie E.
Poulton, Richie
Prinz, Joseph A.
Rasmussen, Line J.H.
Williams, Benjamin S.
Wong, Chloe C.Y.
Mill, Jonathan
Caspi, Avshalom
Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title_full Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title_fullStr Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title_short Patterns of Reliability: Assessing the Reproducibility and Integrity of DNA Methylation Measurement
title_sort patterns of reliability: assessing the reproducibility and integrity of dna methylation measurement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014
work_keys_str_mv AT sugdenkaren patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT hannoneilisj patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT arseneaultlouise patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT belskydanielw patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT corcorandavidl patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT fisherhelenl patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT houtsrenatem patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT kandaswamyradhika patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT moffittterriee patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT poultonrichie patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT prinzjosepha patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT rasmussenlinejh patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT williamsbenjamins patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT wongchloecy patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT milljonathan patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement
AT caspiavshalom patternsofreliabilityassessingthereproducibilityandintegrityofdnamethylationmeasurement