Cargando…

A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions

In humans, most germline mutations are inherited from the father. This observation has been widely interpreted as reflecting the replication errors that accrue during spermatogenesis. If so, the male bias in mutation should be substantially lower in a closely related species with similar rates of sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Felix L., Strand, Alva I., Cox, Laura A., Ober, Carole, Wall, Jeffrey D., Moorjani, Priya, Przeworski, Molly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000838
_version_ 1783577989900926976
author Wu, Felix L.
Strand, Alva I.
Cox, Laura A.
Ober, Carole
Wall, Jeffrey D.
Moorjani, Priya
Przeworski, Molly
author_facet Wu, Felix L.
Strand, Alva I.
Cox, Laura A.
Ober, Carole
Wall, Jeffrey D.
Moorjani, Priya
Przeworski, Molly
author_sort Wu, Felix L.
collection PubMed
description In humans, most germline mutations are inherited from the father. This observation has been widely interpreted as reflecting the replication errors that accrue during spermatogenesis. If so, the male bias in mutation should be substantially lower in a closely related species with similar rates of spermatogonial stem cell divisions but a shorter mean age of reproduction. To test this hypothesis, we resequenced two 3–4 generation nuclear families (totaling 29 individuals) of olive baboons (Papio anubis), who reproduce at approximately 10 years of age on average, and analyzed the data in parallel with three 3-generation human pedigrees (26 individuals). We estimated a mutation rate per generation in baboons of 0.57×10(−8) per base pair, approximately half that of humans. Strikingly, however, the degree of male bias in germline mutations is approximately 4:1, similar to that of humans—indeed, a similar male bias is seen across mammals that reproduce months, years, or decades after birth. These results mirror the finding in humans that the male mutation bias is stable with parental ages and cast further doubt on the assumption that germline mutations track cell divisions. Our mutation rate estimates for baboons raise a further puzzle, suggesting a divergence time between apes and Old World monkeys of 65 million years, too old to be consistent with the fossil record; reconciling them now requires not only a slowdown of the mutation rate per generation in humans but also in baboons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74673312020-09-11 A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions Wu, Felix L. Strand, Alva I. Cox, Laura A. Ober, Carole Wall, Jeffrey D. Moorjani, Priya Przeworski, Molly PLoS Biol Short Reports In humans, most germline mutations are inherited from the father. This observation has been widely interpreted as reflecting the replication errors that accrue during spermatogenesis. If so, the male bias in mutation should be substantially lower in a closely related species with similar rates of spermatogonial stem cell divisions but a shorter mean age of reproduction. To test this hypothesis, we resequenced two 3–4 generation nuclear families (totaling 29 individuals) of olive baboons (Papio anubis), who reproduce at approximately 10 years of age on average, and analyzed the data in parallel with three 3-generation human pedigrees (26 individuals). We estimated a mutation rate per generation in baboons of 0.57×10(−8) per base pair, approximately half that of humans. Strikingly, however, the degree of male bias in germline mutations is approximately 4:1, similar to that of humans—indeed, a similar male bias is seen across mammals that reproduce months, years, or decades after birth. These results mirror the finding in humans that the male mutation bias is stable with parental ages and cast further doubt on the assumption that germline mutations track cell divisions. Our mutation rate estimates for baboons raise a further puzzle, suggesting a divergence time between apes and Old World monkeys of 65 million years, too old to be consistent with the fossil record; reconciling them now requires not only a slowdown of the mutation rate per generation in humans but also in baboons. Public Library of Science 2020-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7467331/ /pubmed/32804933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000838 Text en © 2020 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Reports
Wu, Felix L.
Strand, Alva I.
Cox, Laura A.
Ober, Carole
Wall, Jeffrey D.
Moorjani, Priya
Przeworski, Molly
A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title_full A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title_fullStr A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title_short A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
title_sort comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions
topic Short Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32804933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000838
work_keys_str_mv AT wufelixl acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT strandalvai acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT coxlauraa acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT obercarole acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT walljeffreyd acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT moorjanipriya acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT przeworskimolly acomparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT wufelixl comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT strandalvai comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT coxlauraa comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT obercarole comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT walljeffreyd comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT moorjanipriya comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions
AT przeworskimolly comparisonofhumansandbaboonssuggestsgermlinemutationratesdonottrackcelldivisions