Cargando…

Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?

OBJECTIVE: Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabral, Daniel A.R., Daou, Marcos, Bacelar, Mariane F.B., Parma, Juliana O., Miller, Matthew W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101757
_version_ 1783578099717242880
author Cabral, Daniel A.R.
Daou, Marcos
Bacelar, Mariane F.B.
Parma, Juliana O.
Miller, Matthew W.
author_facet Cabral, Daniel A.R.
Daou, Marcos
Bacelar, Mariane F.B.
Parma, Juliana O.
Miller, Matthew W.
author_sort Cabral, Daniel A.R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study will investigate whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. DESIGN: We will use a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instruction: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: high-pressure/low-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. METHODS: A minimum of 148 participants will be quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups will practice golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups will practice golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants will complete low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74678652020-09-03 Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions? Cabral, Daniel A.R. Daou, Marcos Bacelar, Mariane F.B. Parma, Juliana O. Miller, Matthew W. Psychol Sport Exerc Article OBJECTIVE: Having learners practice a motor skill with the expectation of teaching it (versus an expectation of being tested on it) has been revealed to enhance skill learning. However, this improvement in skill performance is lost when the skill must be performed under psychological pressure due to ‘choking under pressure.’ The present study will investigate whether this choking effect is caused by an accrual of declarative knowledge during skill practice and could be prevented if a technique (analogy instructions) to minimize the accrual of declarative knowledge during practice is employed. DESIGN: We will use a 2 (Expectation: teach/test) x 2 (Instruction: analogy/explicit) x 2 (Posttest: high-pressure/low-pressure) mixed-factor design, with repeated measures on the last factor. METHODS: A minimum of 148 participants will be quasi-randomly assigned (based on sex) to one of four groups. Participants in the teach/analogy and teach/explicit groups will practice golf putting with the expectation of teaching putting to another participant, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. Participants in the test/analogy and test/explicit groups will practice golf putting with the expectation of being tested on their putting, and analogy instructions or explicit instructions, respectively. The next day all participants will complete low- and high-pressure putting posttests, with their putting accuracy serving as the dependent variable. Elsevier Ltd. 2020-11 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7467865/ /pubmed/32901199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101757 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Cabral, Daniel A.R.
Daou, Marcos
Bacelar, Mariane F.B.
Parma, Juliana O.
Miller, Matthew W.
Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title_full Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title_fullStr Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title_full_unstemmed Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title_short Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
title_sort does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill’s execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101757
work_keys_str_mv AT cabraldanielar doeslearningaskillwiththeexpectationofteachingitimpairtheskillsexecutionunderpsychologicalpressureiftheskillislearnedwithanalogyinstructions
AT daoumarcos doeslearningaskillwiththeexpectationofteachingitimpairtheskillsexecutionunderpsychologicalpressureiftheskillislearnedwithanalogyinstructions
AT bacelarmarianefb doeslearningaskillwiththeexpectationofteachingitimpairtheskillsexecutionunderpsychologicalpressureiftheskillislearnedwithanalogyinstructions
AT parmajulianao doeslearningaskillwiththeexpectationofteachingitimpairtheskillsexecutionunderpsychologicalpressureiftheskillislearnedwithanalogyinstructions
AT millermattheww doeslearningaskillwiththeexpectationofteachingitimpairtheskillsexecutionunderpsychologicalpressureiftheskillislearnedwithanalogyinstructions