Cargando…

Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe

BACKGROUND: Facing the emergence of a new RNA virus, clinical laboratories are often helpless in the case of a shortage of reagents recommended by Reference Centres. OBJECTIVES: To compare five open one step RT-qPCR reagents to the SuperScript™ III Platinum™ One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) conside...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddar, Cyrille, Verhoeven, Paul O., Bourlet, Thomas, Pozzetto, Bruno, Pillet, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104636
_version_ 1783579788945915904
author Haddar, Cyrille
Verhoeven, Paul O.
Bourlet, Thomas
Pozzetto, Bruno
Pillet, Sylvie
author_facet Haddar, Cyrille
Verhoeven, Paul O.
Bourlet, Thomas
Pozzetto, Bruno
Pillet, Sylvie
author_sort Haddar, Cyrille
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Facing the emergence of a new RNA virus, clinical laboratories are often helpless in the case of a shortage of reagents recommended by Reference Centres. OBJECTIVES: To compare five open one step RT-qPCR reagents to the SuperScript™ III Platinum™ One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) considered as the reference one in France at the beginning of the pandemic for detection of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens by using a laboratory-developed assay targeting the viral RNA dependant RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 51 NUCLISENS easyMAG extracts from respiratory specimens was tested on ABI 7500 thermocycler with TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), Luna® Universal Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit (New England Biolabs), GoTaq® Probe 1- Step RT-qPCR System (Promega), LightCycler® Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche) and One-step PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (Takara). The CT values obtained using the 5 challenged reagents were compared to those obtained using the reference assay. RESULTS: The percentages of concordance were all above 95 %. When comparing the CT values of the 48 extracts exhibiting CT values < 35 obtained with the reference reagent, the results were similar between the reagents although the differences of CT values were quite dispersed. CONCLUSIONS: All five reagents can be considered as alternative reagents to the reference for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7476897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74768972020-09-08 Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe Haddar, Cyrille Verhoeven, Paul O. Bourlet, Thomas Pozzetto, Bruno Pillet, Sylvie J Clin Virol Short Communication BACKGROUND: Facing the emergence of a new RNA virus, clinical laboratories are often helpless in the case of a shortage of reagents recommended by Reference Centres. OBJECTIVES: To compare five open one step RT-qPCR reagents to the SuperScript™ III Platinum™ One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) considered as the reference one in France at the beginning of the pandemic for detection of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in respiratory specimens by using a laboratory-developed assay targeting the viral RNA dependant RNA polymerase (RdRp) gene. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 51 NUCLISENS easyMAG extracts from respiratory specimens was tested on ABI 7500 thermocycler with TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), Luna® Universal Probe One-Step RT-qPCR Kit (New England Biolabs), GoTaq® Probe 1- Step RT-qPCR System (Promega), LightCycler® Multiplex RNA Virus Master (Roche) and One-step PrimeScript RT-PCR kit (Takara). The CT values obtained using the 5 challenged reagents were compared to those obtained using the reference assay. RESULTS: The percentages of concordance were all above 95 %. When comparing the CT values of the 48 extracts exhibiting CT values < 35 obtained with the reference reagent, the results were similar between the reagents although the differences of CT values were quite dispersed. CONCLUSIONS: All five reagents can be considered as alternative reagents to the reference for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Elsevier B.V. 2020-11 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7476897/ /pubmed/33099260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104636 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Haddar, Cyrille
Verhoeven, Paul O.
Bourlet, Thomas
Pozzetto, Bruno
Pillet, Sylvie
Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title_full Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title_fullStr Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title_full_unstemmed Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title_short Brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step RT-qPCR mastermixes for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using a Taqman probe
title_sort brief comparative evaluation of six open one-step rt-qpcr mastermixes for the detection of sars-cov-2 rna using a taqman probe
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33099260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104636
work_keys_str_mv AT haddarcyrille briefcomparativeevaluationofsixopenonesteprtqpcrmastermixesforthedetectionofsarscov2rnausingataqmanprobe
AT verhoevenpaulo briefcomparativeevaluationofsixopenonesteprtqpcrmastermixesforthedetectionofsarscov2rnausingataqmanprobe
AT bourletthomas briefcomparativeevaluationofsixopenonesteprtqpcrmastermixesforthedetectionofsarscov2rnausingataqmanprobe
AT pozzettobruno briefcomparativeevaluationofsixopenonesteprtqpcrmastermixesforthedetectionofsarscov2rnausingataqmanprobe
AT pilletsylvie briefcomparativeevaluationofsixopenonesteprtqpcrmastermixesforthedetectionofsarscov2rnausingataqmanprobe