Cargando…
How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one?
Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is still questionable. Nevertheless, it can be influenced by proper communication strategy. Therefore, our research focuses on (1) the type of information concerning AVs that consumers seek and (2) how to communicate this technology in order to increase...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32898137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238714 |
_version_ | 1783580142435565568 |
---|---|
author | Hryniewicz, Konrad Grzegorczyk, Tomasz |
author_facet | Hryniewicz, Konrad Grzegorczyk, Tomasz |
author_sort | Hryniewicz, Konrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is still questionable. Nevertheless, it can be influenced by proper communication strategy. Therefore, our research focuses on (1) the type of information concerning AVs that consumers seek and (2) how to communicate this technology in order to increase its acceptance. In the first study (N = 711) topic modeling showed that the most sought for information concern the communion and the agency of AVs. In the second, experimental study (N = 303) we measured the participants’ fear and goal-orientation in relation to AVs. Then, after the manipulation of the AV advertisement (imbued with communal vs agentic content), technology acceptance components (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and behavioral intention) were verified. The comparative analysis of the structural model estimates showed that the both participants’ fear and goal-orientation in relation to AVs were associated much more with the acceptance components of the communal AV rather than the agentic one. Therefore, people want to know both whether AVs are communal and agentic, but they are more prone to accept a communal AV than agentic one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7478831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74788312020-09-18 How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? Hryniewicz, Konrad Grzegorczyk, Tomasz PLoS One Research Article Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is still questionable. Nevertheless, it can be influenced by proper communication strategy. Therefore, our research focuses on (1) the type of information concerning AVs that consumers seek and (2) how to communicate this technology in order to increase its acceptance. In the first study (N = 711) topic modeling showed that the most sought for information concern the communion and the agency of AVs. In the second, experimental study (N = 303) we measured the participants’ fear and goal-orientation in relation to AVs. Then, after the manipulation of the AV advertisement (imbued with communal vs agentic content), technology acceptance components (perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and behavioral intention) were verified. The comparative analysis of the structural model estimates showed that the both participants’ fear and goal-orientation in relation to AVs were associated much more with the acceptance components of the communal AV rather than the agentic one. Therefore, people want to know both whether AVs are communal and agentic, but they are more prone to accept a communal AV than agentic one. Public Library of Science 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7478831/ /pubmed/32898137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238714 Text en © 2020 Hryniewicz, Grzegorczyk http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hryniewicz, Konrad Grzegorczyk, Tomasz How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title | How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title_full | How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title_fullStr | How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title_full_unstemmed | How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title_short | How different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: Is a communal car better than agentic one? |
title_sort | how different autonomous vehicle presentation influences its acceptance: is a communal car better than agentic one? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7478831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32898137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hryniewiczkonrad howdifferentautonomousvehiclepresentationinfluencesitsacceptanceisacommunalcarbetterthanagenticone AT grzegorczyktomasz howdifferentautonomousvehiclepresentationinfluencesitsacceptanceisacommunalcarbetterthanagenticone |