Cargando…

Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws

Multiple-Choice Questions provide an objective cost/time effective assessment. Deviation from appropriate question writing structural guidelines will most probably result in commonly ignored multiple-choice questions writing flaws, influencing the ability of the assessment to measure students’ cogni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowash, Mawlood, Alhobeira, Hazza, Hussein, Iyad, Al Halabi, Manal, Khan, Saif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224
_version_ 1783580835729899520
author Kowash, Mawlood
Alhobeira, Hazza
Hussein, Iyad
Al Halabi, Manal
Khan, Saif
author_facet Kowash, Mawlood
Alhobeira, Hazza
Hussein, Iyad
Al Halabi, Manal
Khan, Saif
author_sort Kowash, Mawlood
collection PubMed
description Multiple-Choice Questions provide an objective cost/time effective assessment. Deviation from appropriate question writing structural guidelines will most probably result in commonly ignored multiple-choice questions writing flaws, influencing the ability of the assessment to measure students’ cognitive levels thereby seriously affecting students’ academic performance outcome measures. To gauge the knowledge of multiple-choice question items writing flaws in dental faculty working at colleges in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. A cross-sectional short online Survey Monkey(TM) multiple-choice questions-based questionnaire was disseminated to dental faculty working in GCC countries during the academic year 2018/2019. The questionnaire included five test incorrect (flawed) multiple-choice questions and one correct control question. The participants were asked to identify flawed multiple-choice question items from the known 14 items writing flaws. Out of a total of 460 faculty, 216 respondents completed the questionnaires, 132 (61.1%) were from Saudi Arabia, while numbers of participants from United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman were 59 (27.3), 14 (6.5%) and 11 (5.1%) respectively. Majority of participants were male (n = 141, 65.9%) compared to 73 females (34.1%). Eighty percent of the participants possessed more than five years of teaching experience. Assistant professors constituted the majority (43.3%) of the academic positions participating in this study. The overall fail rate ranged from 76.3% to 98.1% and almost 2/3(rds) of the participants were unable to identify one or more of the flawed item(s). No significant association was observed between the demographics (age, region, academic position and specialty) and knowledge except that of participant’s gender (p < 0.009). GCC dental faculty demonstrated below average knowledge of multiple-choice question items writing flaws. Training and workshops are needed to ensure substantial exposure to proper multiple-choice question items construction standards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7482711
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74827112020-09-16 Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws Kowash, Mawlood Alhobeira, Hazza Hussein, Iyad Al Halabi, Manal Khan, Saif Med Educ Online Research Article Multiple-Choice Questions provide an objective cost/time effective assessment. Deviation from appropriate question writing structural guidelines will most probably result in commonly ignored multiple-choice questions writing flaws, influencing the ability of the assessment to measure students’ cognitive levels thereby seriously affecting students’ academic performance outcome measures. To gauge the knowledge of multiple-choice question items writing flaws in dental faculty working at colleges in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. A cross-sectional short online Survey Monkey(TM) multiple-choice questions-based questionnaire was disseminated to dental faculty working in GCC countries during the academic year 2018/2019. The questionnaire included five test incorrect (flawed) multiple-choice questions and one correct control question. The participants were asked to identify flawed multiple-choice question items from the known 14 items writing flaws. Out of a total of 460 faculty, 216 respondents completed the questionnaires, 132 (61.1%) were from Saudi Arabia, while numbers of participants from United Arab Emirates, Kuwait and Oman were 59 (27.3), 14 (6.5%) and 11 (5.1%) respectively. Majority of participants were male (n = 141, 65.9%) compared to 73 females (34.1%). Eighty percent of the participants possessed more than five years of teaching experience. Assistant professors constituted the majority (43.3%) of the academic positions participating in this study. The overall fail rate ranged from 76.3% to 98.1% and almost 2/3(rds) of the participants were unable to identify one or more of the flawed item(s). No significant association was observed between the demographics (age, region, academic position and specialty) and knowledge except that of participant’s gender (p < 0.009). GCC dental faculty demonstrated below average knowledge of multiple-choice question items writing flaws. Training and workshops are needed to ensure substantial exposure to proper multiple-choice question items construction standards. Taylor & Francis 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7482711/ /pubmed/32835640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kowash, Mawlood
Alhobeira, Hazza
Hussein, Iyad
Al Halabi, Manal
Khan, Saif
Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title_full Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title_fullStr Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title_short Knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
title_sort knowledge of dental faculty in gulf cooperation council states of multiple-choice questions’ item writing flaws
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7482711/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1812224
work_keys_str_mv AT kowashmawlood knowledgeofdentalfacultyingulfcooperationcouncilstatesofmultiplechoicequestionsitemwritingflaws
AT alhobeirahazza knowledgeofdentalfacultyingulfcooperationcouncilstatesofmultiplechoicequestionsitemwritingflaws
AT husseiniyad knowledgeofdentalfacultyingulfcooperationcouncilstatesofmultiplechoicequestionsitemwritingflaws
AT alhalabimanal knowledgeofdentalfacultyingulfcooperationcouncilstatesofmultiplechoicequestionsitemwritingflaws
AT khansaif knowledgeofdentalfacultyingulfcooperationcouncilstatesofmultiplechoicequestionsitemwritingflaws