Cargando…
Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate parent and teacher opinion of the provision of in-school eyecare and jargon-free written reporting of visual status for children in special educational settings. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A nationally-agreed, in-school eyecare framework for children attending special schools...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238779 |
_version_ | 1783581234951094272 |
---|---|
author | McConnell, Emma L. Black, Shelley A. McClelland, Julie F. McKerr, Lynne Dillenburger, Karola Anketell, Pamela Jackson, A. Jonathan Little, Julie-Anne Saunders, Kathryn J. |
author_facet | McConnell, Emma L. Black, Shelley A. McClelland, Julie F. McKerr, Lynne Dillenburger, Karola Anketell, Pamela Jackson, A. Jonathan Little, Julie-Anne Saunders, Kathryn J. |
author_sort | McConnell, Emma L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate parent and teacher opinion of the provision of in-school eyecare and jargon-free written reporting of visual status for children in special educational settings. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A nationally-agreed, in-school eyecare framework for children attending special schools which recommends a full eye examination, dispensing of spectacles and provision of a jargon-free written report of visual outcomes to parents and teachers, was provided to 200 children (mean age 10 years, 9 months; 70% male) attending a special school in the UK. The written ‘Vision Report’ detailed, in lay-language, results from the eye examination and provided practical advice to alleviate the impact of vision difficulties both at home and in the classroom. Following implementation of the framework, parents and teachers completed a feedback questionnaire to determine their opinion of the in-school eye examination and utility of the Vision Report. RESULTS: Parents of 123 participants returned a feedback questionnaire. Eighty-eight participants were represented by the 23 teachers who returned a questionnaire. The in-school eyecare was rated positively for children in special education by 82.4% of parents and 80.9% of teachers. Key benefits included the familiarity of the in-school setting (81.3% of parents and 100% of teachers agree), the convenience of the setting for parents (74.0% of parents and 100% of teachers agree), and the opportunity for teachers to speak directly to eyecare providers regarding a child’s visual needs (82.6% of teachers agree). The information provided by the Vision Report was deemed useful day-to-day by 78.3% of parents and 100% of teachers. The majority (80%) of teachers implemented classroom modifications suggested in the report, whereas only 47.9% of parents reported implementation of modifications at home. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of in-school eyecare is valued by parents and teachers of children in special education settings. Jargon-free, written reports of visual status are valued and utilised by parents and teachers. Further support is required to aid parents in implementing vision modifications at home. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7485870 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74858702020-09-21 Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status McConnell, Emma L. Black, Shelley A. McClelland, Julie F. McKerr, Lynne Dillenburger, Karola Anketell, Pamela Jackson, A. Jonathan Little, Julie-Anne Saunders, Kathryn J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate parent and teacher opinion of the provision of in-school eyecare and jargon-free written reporting of visual status for children in special educational settings. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A nationally-agreed, in-school eyecare framework for children attending special schools which recommends a full eye examination, dispensing of spectacles and provision of a jargon-free written report of visual outcomes to parents and teachers, was provided to 200 children (mean age 10 years, 9 months; 70% male) attending a special school in the UK. The written ‘Vision Report’ detailed, in lay-language, results from the eye examination and provided practical advice to alleviate the impact of vision difficulties both at home and in the classroom. Following implementation of the framework, parents and teachers completed a feedback questionnaire to determine their opinion of the in-school eye examination and utility of the Vision Report. RESULTS: Parents of 123 participants returned a feedback questionnaire. Eighty-eight participants were represented by the 23 teachers who returned a questionnaire. The in-school eyecare was rated positively for children in special education by 82.4% of parents and 80.9% of teachers. Key benefits included the familiarity of the in-school setting (81.3% of parents and 100% of teachers agree), the convenience of the setting for parents (74.0% of parents and 100% of teachers agree), and the opportunity for teachers to speak directly to eyecare providers regarding a child’s visual needs (82.6% of teachers agree). The information provided by the Vision Report was deemed useful day-to-day by 78.3% of parents and 100% of teachers. The majority (80%) of teachers implemented classroom modifications suggested in the report, whereas only 47.9% of parents reported implementation of modifications at home. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of in-school eyecare is valued by parents and teachers of children in special education settings. Jargon-free, written reports of visual status are valued and utilised by parents and teachers. Further support is required to aid parents in implementing vision modifications at home. Public Library of Science 2020-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7485870/ /pubmed/32915866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238779 Text en © 2020 McConnell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McConnell, Emma L. Black, Shelley A. McClelland, Julie F. McKerr, Lynne Dillenburger, Karola Anketell, Pamela Jackson, A. Jonathan Little, Julie-Anne Saunders, Kathryn J. Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title | Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title_full | Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title_fullStr | Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title_full_unstemmed | Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title_short | Parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
title_sort | parents and teachers of children in special education settings value in-school eyecare and written reports of visual status |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485870/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238779 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcconnellemmal parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT blackshelleya parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT mcclellandjulief parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT mckerrlynne parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT dillenburgerkarola parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT anketellpamela parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT jacksonajonathan parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT littlejulieanne parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus AT saunderskathrynj parentsandteachersofchildreninspecialeducationsettingsvalueinschooleyecareandwrittenreportsofvisualstatus |