Cargando…
Human germline editing in the era of CRISPR-Cas: risk and uncertainty, inter-generational responsibility, therapeutic legitimacy
BACKGROUND: Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-associated (CRISPR-Cas) technology may allow for efficient and highly targeted gene editing in single-cell embryos. This possibility brings human germline editing into the focus of ethical and legal debates again. MAIN BODY: Again...
Autores principales: | Schleidgen, Sebastian, Dederer, Hans-Georg, Sgodda, Susan, Cravcisin, Stefan, Lüneburg, Luca, Cantz, Tobias, Heinemann, Thomas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7488432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00487-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Synthetic Notch-Receptor-Mediated Transmission of a Transient Signal into Permanent Information via CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing
por: Sgodda, Malte, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Global constitutionalism, applied to global health governance: uncovering legitimacy deficits and suggesting remedies
por: Ooms, Gorik, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Is selecting better than modifying? An investigation of arguments against germline gene editing as compared to preimplantation genetic diagnosis
por: v. Hammerstein, Alix Lenia, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Trust in Science: CRISPR–Cas9 and the Ban on Human Germline Editing
por: Guttinger, Stephan
Publicado: (2017) -
CRISPR-Cas systems: ushering in the new genome editing era
por: Perez Rojo, Fernando, et al.
Publicado: (2018)